Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 76(10): 583-91, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19797458

RESUMO

Factors that promote stone formation include low daily urine volumes; saturation of the urine with calcium, oxalate, calcium phosphate, uric acid, or cystine; acidic urine; and bacterial infection. The author identifies the mechanisms of stone formation and outlines management aimed at preventing recurrences.


Assuntos
Nefrolitíase/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Cálcio/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Hipercalciúria/complicações , Hipercalciúria/prevenção & controle , Hiperparatireoidismo/complicações , Cálculos Renais/química , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrolitíase/etiologia , Nefrolitíase/prevenção & controle , Nefrolitíase/terapia , Prevenção Secundária , Ácido Úrico/análise , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 46(2): 242-52, 2005 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16112042

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in severely ill inpatients is clinically important for therapeutic interventions and prognosis, but notoriously difficult to do accurately. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula are widely used to estimate renal function in sick hospitalized patients; however, neither method has been validated in this setting. METHODS: Iodine 125-iothalamate clearances (iGFR) performed in 107 sick inpatients with renal dysfunction were compared with estimated GFRs (eGFRs) from the 6- and 4-variable MDRD (MDRD eGFR) and CG (CG eGFR) equations. RESULTS: Mean serum creatinine (SCr) level was 3.5 +/- 2.0 mg/dL (309 +/- 177 micromol/L), and mean iGFR was 17.1 +/- 17.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (0.29 +/- 0.30 mL/s/1.73 m2). Six-variable MDRD eGFR was 22.5 +/- 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (0.38 +/- 0.29 mL/s/1.73 m2), 4-variable MDRD eGFR was 23.9 +/- 16.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 (0.40 +/- 0.27 mL/s/1.73 m2), and CG eGFR was 26.0 +/- 17.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (0.43 +/- 0.29 mL/s/1.73 m2). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/SCr ratios greater than 20 were seen in 58% of patients. Overall, the CG and MDRD equations overestimated iGFR, with poor agreement. Overestimation of at least 25% of measured iGFR was seen in 63%, 67%, and 70% of all inpatients when using the 6-variable MDRD, 4-variable MDRD, and CG equations, respectively. Accuracy of eGFR within 50% of measured iGFR was 55% for the 6-variable MDRD equation, 49% for the 4-variable MDRD equation, and 40% for the CG formula. The performance of both methods deteriorated further in patients with a BUN/SCr ratio greater than 20. CONCLUSION: Estimation equations are performed poorly compared with iGFR and are not reliable measures of actual level of function in sick hospitalized patients, especially those with a high BUN/SCr ratio. Although use of the 6-variable MDRD equation provides a better estimation of GFR, it still is unsuitable for clinical application in this population.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Pacientes Internados , Nefropatias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Albuminúria/diagnóstico , Nitrogênio da Ureia Sanguínea , Creatinina/sangue , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/farmacocinética , Ácido Iotalâmico/farmacocinética , Nefropatias/fisiopatologia , Nefropatias/urina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/farmacocinética , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
3.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 16(2): 459-66, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15615823

RESUMO

The performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equations as compared with measured (125)I-iothalamate GFR (iGFR) was analyzed in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in potential kidney donors. All outpatients (n = 1285) who underwent an iGFR between 1996 and 2003 were considered for analysis. Of these, 828 patients had CKD and 457 were potential kidney donors. Special emphasis was put on the calibration of the serum creatinine measurements. In CKD patients with GFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), the MDRD equation performed better than the CG formula with respect to bias (-0.5 versus 3.5 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively) and accuracy within 30% (71 versus 60%, respectively) and 50% (89 versus 77%, respectively). Similar results are reported for 249 CKD patients with diabetes. In the kidney donor group, the MDRD equation significantly underestimated the measured GFR when compared with the CG formula, with a bias of -9.0 versus 1.9 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively (P < 0.01), and both the MDRD and CG equations overestimated the strength of the association of GFR with measured serum creatinine. The present data add further validation of the MDRD equation in outpatients with moderate to advanced kidney disease as well as in those with diabetic nephropathy but suggest that its use is problematic in healthy individuals. This study also emphasizes the complexity of laboratory calibration of serum creatinine measurements, a determining factor when estimating GFR in both healthy individuals and CKD patients with preserved GFR.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Nefropatias Diabéticas/dietoterapia , Nefropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Dieta , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Nefropatias Diabéticas/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal , Transplante de Rim , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Probabilidade , Valores de Referência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Doadores de Tecidos
5.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 71(8): 639-50, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15449759

RESUMO

Hyponatremia is common in hospitalized patients. By taking a careful and logical approach, one can promptly recognize the causative factor or factors in nearly all cases. Most cases of hyponatremia are due to impaired renal water excretion, and recognizing the cause and pathophysiologic process makes it possible to provide focused individualized care and avoid mistreatment.


Assuntos
Hiponatremia/fisiopatologia , Água Corporal/metabolismo , Humanos , Hiponatremia/diagnóstico , Hiponatremia/etiologia , Síndrome de Secreção Inadequada de HAD/diagnóstico , Equilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/fisiologia
6.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 69(11): 885-8, 2002 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12430973

RESUMO

The traditional wisdom on preventing calcium stones, the most common form of kidney stone, has been to advise patients to limit dietary calcium. Research has proved this wrong, however. Normal dietary calcium intake, along with reduced salt and protein, is now advised. This paper also summarizes the diagnosis and treatment of the less-common forms of kidney stones-struvite, uric acid, and cystine.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/etiologia , Cálculos Renais/terapia , Cálcio da Dieta/administração & dosagem , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Cistina/metabolismo , Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Cálculos Renais/diagnóstico , Compostos de Magnésio/metabolismo , Compostos de Magnésio/urina , Fosfatos/metabolismo , Fosfatos/urina , Fatores de Risco , Ácido Úrico/metabolismo , Ácido Úrico/urina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA