Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation phase 1 studies evaluating BTH1677, a 1, 3-1,6 beta glucan pathogen associated molecular pattern, in healthy volunteer subjects.

BACKGROUND: BTH1677 is a beta glucan pathogen associated molecular pattern (PAMP) currently being investigated as a novel cancer therapy. Here, the initial safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) results of BTH1677 in healthy subjects are reported. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In the Phase 1a single-dosing study, subjects were randomized (3:1 per cohort) to a single intravenous (i.v.) infusion of BTH1677 at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, or 6 mg/kg or placebo, respectively. In the Phase 1b multi-dosing study, subjects were randomized (3:1 per cohort) to 7 daily i.v. infusions of BTH1677 at 1, 2, or 4 mg/kg or placebo, respectively. Safety and PK non-compartmental analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects (N = 24 Phase 1a; N = 12 Phase 1b) were randomized to treatment. No deaths or serious adverse events occurred in either study. Mild or moderate adverse events (AEs) occurred in 67% of BTH1677-treated subjects in both studies. Treatment-related AEs (occurring in ≥10% of subjects) included dyspnea, flushing, headache, nausea, paraesthesia, and rash in Phase 1a and conjunctivitis and headache in Phase 1b. BTH1677 serum concentration was linear with dose. Clearance, serum elimination half-life (t1/2) and volume of distribution (Vss) were BTH1677 dose-independent. In Phase 1b, area under the curve, t1/2, and Vss values were larger at steady state on days 6-30 versus day 0. CONCLUSIONS: BTH1677 was well tolerated after single doses up to 6 mg/kg and after 7 daily doses up to 4 mg/kg.

The influence of food on the bioavailability of a twice-daily controlled release carbamazepine formulation.

Carbatrol, a new dosage form of carbamazepine (CBZ), was developed consisting of three different types of pellets (immediate release, controlled release, and enteric release). The objective of this study was to explore the influence of food on absorption of CBZ. This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose crossover study conducted in 12 healthy volunteers. Treatments were 2 x 200 mg Carbatrol with a high-fat meal, fasted, or sprinkled over applesauce (but otherwise fasted). Each subject received one dose of each treatment separated by a washout period of at least 2 weeks. CBZ bioequivalence was established based on the equivalence of AUC (extent of absorption) in all three conditions. Carbatrol may be taken with or without food or the capsule opened and sprinkled on food.

Improving diabetes care in a large health care system: an enhanced primary care approach.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted improvement strategy on diabetes quality of care in a defined population of patients. STUDY DESIGN: A multifaceted improvement strategy to enhance diabetes care was deployed to 18 primary care clinics serving 170,000 adults. Interventions empowered patient self-management, supported care team decision making, redesigned office systems, and maximized use of available information technology. Specific goals were to improve glycemic control and reduce cardiovascular risk in all adult diabetes patients. DATA SOURCE AND COLLECTION: Diabetes was identified through pharmacy and diagnostic data (estimated sensitivity 0.91, positive predictive value 0.94), and the target population ranged from 6,542 to 7,037 members over time. Trends in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipid LDL-cholesterol were analyzed monthly throughout 1999 in both cohorts and serial cross-sections. RESULTS: During 12 months, mean HbA1c improved from 7.86% to 7.47%, and the proportion of patients with HbA1c levels < 8% rose from 60.5% to 68.3%, and the proportion with HbA1c > 10% fell from 10.3% to 7.2%. The LDL test rate rose from 47.4% to 57.4%, and mean LDL fell from 120 mg/dl to 116 mg/dl. The proportion with acceptable lipid control (LDL < 130 mg/dl, or < 100 mg/dl with coronary artery disease) rose from 48.9% to 57.7%. All changes were significant at p < 0.01 or less. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant population-based improvements in diabetes care were observed during a 1-year period using a multifaceted "enhanced primary care" strategy.

Pharmacokinetics and blood pressure response of losartan in end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Losartan is a selective angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist currently employed in the management of essential hypertension. This compound is in common use in populations with renal failure and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan in patients with ESRD in order to establish administration guidelines. METHODS: Patients were administered losartan 100 mg/day for 7 days, and after the seventh and final dose pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for both losartan and its active metabolite E-3174. During the study, the haemodialytic clearances of losartan and E-3174 were measured during a standard 4-hour dialysis session. Neurohumoral and biochemical changes were assessed during losartan administration. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 in haemodialysis patients did not alter to a clinically significant level. Losartan administration was accompanied by a decline in plasma aldosterone level as well as by an increase in plasma renin activity. Losartan administration resulted in a decline in plasma uric acid level, despite the fact that the study participants had no residual renal function. Losartan and E-3174 were not dialysable. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 are minimally altered in ESRD; thus, dosage adjustment is not required in the presence of advanced dialysis-dependent renal failure. In addition, postdialysis supplementation is not required for losartan because of the negligible dialysability of losartan and E-3174.

Pharmacokinetics of flutamide in patients with renal insufficiency.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of flutamide, a nonsteroidal antiandrogenic compound, and its pharmacologically active metabolite, hydroxyflutamide, in renal insufficiency. Haemodialysis (HD) clearance of flutamide and hydroxyflutamide was also determined. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed for flutamide and hydroxyflutamide in 26 male subjects with normal renal function (creatinine clearance by 24 h urine collection, CLcr, greater than 80 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2); n=6) or reduced renal function; CLcr=50-80 (n=7), 30-49 (n=3), 5-29 (n=4), and <5 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2)-HD (n=6), following a single, oral 250 mg flutamide dose. Subjects undergoing HD received a second 250 mg dose of flutamide 4 h prior to HD; blood and dialysate were collected during HD to determine dialysability of flutamide and hydroxyflutamide. RESULTS: Cmax, tmax, AUC, t1/2, and renal clearance of flutamide and hydroxyflutamide did not differ between groups. Less than 1% of the dose appeared in dialysate as hydroxyflutamide. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function did not affect flutamide nor hydroxyflutamide disposition. HD did not alter hydroxyflutamide pharmacokinetics. Dosing adjustments for renal impairment or HD are not indicated for flutamide.

Pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous dolasetron mesylate in patients with renal impairment.

In an open-label, randomized, two-way complete crossover study, the influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and its primary active metabolite, hydrodolasetron, were evaluated. Patients with renal impairment were stratified into three groups of 12 based on their 24-hour creatinine clearance (Cl(cr)): group 1, mild impairment (Cl(cr) between 41 and 80 mL/min); group 2, moderate impairment (Cl(cr) between 11 and 40 mL/min); and group 3, endstage renal impairment (Cl(cr) < or = 10 mL/min). Twenty-four healthy volunteers from a previous study served as the control group. Each participant received a single intravenous or oral 200-mg dose of dolasetron mesylate on separate occasions. Serial blood samples were collected up to 60 hours after dose for determination of dolasetron and hydrodolasetron, and urine samples were collected in intervals up to 72 hours for determination of dolasetron, hydrodolasetron, and the 5' and 6'-hydroxy metabolites of hydrodolasetron. Because plasma concentrations were low and sporadic, pharmacokinetic parameters of dolasetron were not calculated after oral administration. Although some significant differences in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity), volume of distribution (Vd), systemic clearance (Cl), and elimination half-life (t1/2) of the parent drug were observed between control subjects and patients with renal impairment, there were no systematic findings related to degree of renal dysfunction. The elimination pathways of hydrodolasetron include both hepatic metabolism and renal excretion. Consistent increases in mean Cmax, AUC0-infinity, and t1/2 and decreases in renal and total apparent clearance of hydrodolasetron were seen with diminishing renal function after intravenous administration of dolasetron mesylate. No consistent changes were found after oral administration. Urinary excretion of hydrodolasetron and its metabolites decreased with decreasing renal function, but the profile of metabolites remained constant. Dolasetron was well tolerated in all three groups of patients. Based on these findings, no dosage adjustment for dolasetron is recommended in patients with renal impairment.

Effects of probenecid and cimetidine on renal disposition of ofloxacin in rats.

The renal handling of ofloxacin in rats which were given ofloxacin either alone or in combination with probenecid or cimetidine was studied. In the presence of cimetidine or probenecid, ofloxacin's total and renal clearances were reduced and its half-life was prolonged. This suggests that ofloxacin is secreted by both the anionic and cationic transport systems.

Pharmacokinetics of zileuton and its metabolites in patients with renal impairment.

The pharmacokinetics of zileuton and its conjugated metabolites were evaluated in patients with chronic renal impairment. Five healthy volunteers (creatinine clearance > 90 mL/min), five patients with renal failure requiring hemodialysis, six with mild (creatinine clearance, 60-90 mL/min), eight with moderate (creatinine clearance, 30-59 mL/min), and six with severe (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) renal impairment participated in the study. Zileuton was well tolerated by all participants including those with severe renal impairment and those receiving hemodialysis. The pharmacokinetics of zileuton were similar in healthy volunteers; in patients with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment; and in patients with renal failure requiring hemodialysis. The mean metabolite/parent-area ratios for the pharmacologically inactive zileuton glucuronides progressively increased with the decline in renal function. A very small percentage of the administered zileuton dose (< 0.5%) was removed by hemodialysis. Therefore, adjustment in the dose regimen of zileuton does not appear to be necessary for patients with various degrees of renal impairment and patients with renal failure requiring hemodialysis.

Absolute bioavailability of bromfenac in humans.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate absolute bioavailability of bromfenac and to compare its pharmacokinetics after intravenous and oral administration. DESIGN: This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study conducted under fasting conditions with a washout period of at least 48 hours between doses. Each subject received a 50-mg dose of bromfenac both intravenously and orally followed by collection of blood samples at specified time intervals. Bromfenac plasma concentrations were measured by using a validated HPLC method with ultraviolet detection. SETTING: The study was conducted at the Drug Evaluation Unit. Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN. SUBJECTS: The participants consisted of 12 healthy subjects between 18 and 45 years of age and within +/-15% of ideal body weight. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD absolute bioavailability of bromfenac was 67% +/- 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of bromfenac were similar after intravenous and oral administration, suggesting that the prototype oral dosage form is optimal and that the observed intersubject variability is due to bromfenac itself, not the type of dosage form.

Determination of residual renal function with iohexol clearance in hemodialysis patients.

Residual renal function (RRF) may contribute significantly to the total dialysis prescription. Conventional quantitation of RRF in hemodialysis (HD) patients is measured by urea clearance and requires a 24-hour urine collection which is often difficult to perform and inaccurate. The renal clearance of iohexol was evaluated as an alternative method for RRF assessment (iohexol-derived RRF) in hemodialysis patients. An intravenous bolus of iohexol (12 ml; 300 mg iodine/ml) was administered to 42 hemodialysis patients following routine HD. A single blood sample was obtained approximately 44 hours later (pre-HD) to determine the plasma clearance of iohexol using x-ray fluorescence methods. Total body clearance of iohexol (CTBio) and non-renal clearance of iohexol (CNRio) 2.87 +/- 0.3 ml/min (mean +/SEM) were used to calculate iohexol-derived RRF (CTBio-CNRio). Iohexol-derived RRF determinations were then compared to urea clearance-derived RRF measurements. The RRF contribution to the dialysis prescription was also calculated utilizing iohexol-derived RRF compared to urea-derived RRF. Iohexol-derived RRF did not differ from urea-derived RRF (2.48 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.64 +/- 0.4 ml/min, P = 0.21). The RRF contribution to the weekly dialysis prescription (Kt/V) did not differ when iohexol-derived RRF was compared to urea-derived RRF (0.94 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.93 +/- 0.1, P = 0.9). Additionally, the effect of iohexol on RRF was assessed in 17 HD patients. Urea-derived RRF determinations one week after iohexol exposure did not differ from those measured one week prior to iohexol exposure (3.17 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.91 +/- 0.5 ml/min, respectively). Thus, renal clearance of iohexol can be an accurate and safe measure of RRF in HD patients and potentially simplify delivery of the dialysis prescription.

Pharmacologic profile of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin in hemodialysis patients.

Various hemoglobin compounds have been evaluated as potential oxygen-carrying, blood volume expanders, but toxicity has prevented clinical application. Diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin (DCLHb) represents a modified hemoglobin compound that is derived from human red blood cells and maintained in a tetrameric configuration by cross-linkages between the two alpha chains of the hemoglobin molecule. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, cross-over trial, DCLHb's safety and pharmacologic parameters were evaluated in 18 subjects receiving chronic hemodialytic therapy. A 30-minute infusion of 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg DCLHb or placebo was given at the start of routine hemodialysis. One week later, the alternate treatment (placebo or DCLHb) was administered. Maximum plasma hemoglobin concentrations and terminal half-life values were calculated for each dosage group. Dialysate was collected and assayed for hemoglobin. Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline and the volume of hypertonic saline administered for treatment of hypotension during hemodialysis were measured. The maximum plasma hemoglobin concentrations increased with DCLHb dose and occurred at the end of DCLHb infusion. The mean (+/- SD) terminal half-life ranged from 2.1 +/- 1.0 hours in the 25 mg/kg DCLHb group to 4.3 +/- 1.4 hours in the 100 mg/kg group, but did not differ significantly between groups. Mean baseline plasma hemoglobin corrected areas under the plasma concentration-time curves increased from 89 to 1,136 mg/hr/dL across the fourfold dose range. Diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin was not dialyzable as none was detected in dialysate. The maximum increase in systolic blood pressure from baseline increased significantly with DCLHb dose compared with placebo (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The pharmacokinetics of losartan in renal insufficiency.

AIM: To determine the effect of renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan (MK-954) and its metabolite E3174. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A two-center, unblinded trial was performed in 18 patients (age range 31-63 years) with various degrees of renal function grouped according to the renal clearance of creatinine: group I, creatinine clearance > or = 75 ml/min; group II, creatinine clearance 30-74 ml/min; group III, creatinine clearance 10-29 ml/min (n = 6 in all groups). Losartan (100 mg/day) was administered under supervised conditions for seven consecutive days. Plasma samples were taken for up to 60 h and 24-h urine collections were made following the final dose of losartan (on day 7) to determine losartan and E3174 concentrations, with simultaneous measurements of blood pressure and the pulse rate. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters for losartan and E3174 changed inconsequentially across the range of renal insufficiency. For losartan, renal clearance decreased from 50 +/- 19 ml/min in group I to 2.3 +/- 0.9 ml/min in group III (P < 0.05). For E3174, although the renal clearance decreased from 16 +/- 4.1 ml/min in group I to 1.3 +/- 0.8 ml/min in group III (P < 0.05), the area under the plasma concentration curve did not change. CONCLUSIONS: The steady-state areas under the curve of losartan and E3174 are not significantly changed with renal impairment. The renal clearance of losartan decreases with renal impairment but since only a small percentage of the dose is ordinarily eliminated by the kidney, the demonstrated reduction in clearance is clinically irrelevant. The renal clearance of E3174 also decreases with renal impairment, but the steady-state area under the curve does not increase with increasing degrees of renal insufficiency. These pharmacokinetic alterations do not warrant dose adjustment in the face of renal insufficiency.

Disposition of gabapentin in anuric subjects on hemodialysis.

Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant drug, which in man is cleared solely by renal excretion and is not bound to plasma proteins. Because the clearance of gabapentin is dependent on renal function, the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin were investigated in anuric subjects maintained on hemodialysis. Plasma samples were obtained over an 8-day period after administration of single oral 400-mg doses of gabapentin. Pre- and post-dialyzer plasma samples and dialysate samples from quantitative collection of dialyzer effluent were obtained during hemodialysis sessions performed 2, 4, and 7 days after dosing. A mean (SD) maximum gabapentin plasma concentration of 6.0 (2.4) micrograms/mL was achieved at 4.7 (2.1) hours post-dose. The elimination half-life of gabapentin on non-hemodialysis days averaged 132 hours. Approximately 35% of the gabapentin dose was recovered in dialysate, and mean hemodialysis clearance of gabapentin was 142 (26) mL/min; approximately 93% of the dialyzer creatinine clearance. Gabapentin elimination half-life during hemodialysis was approximately 4 hours. Systemic plasma gabapentin concentrations increased approximately 30% during the first 2 hours after hemodialysis as a result of drug redistribution in the body. It is recommended that patients with end-stage renal disease maintained on hemodialysis receive an initial 300-mg to 400-mg gabapentin loading dose. Plasma gabapentin concentrations can be maintained by giving 200 to 300 mg of gabapentin after every 4 hours of hemodialysis.

Pharmacokinetics of bepridil and two of its metabolites in patients with end-stage renal disease.

The pharmacokinetics of bepridil and 2 of its major metabolites (McN-A-2600 and McN-6303) were studied in 6 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) before and after hemodialysis. Patients underwent dialysis 1 day after a single oral 200-mg dose of bepridil hydrochloride; blood was sampled for up to 7 days. The mean (+/- SD) peak plasma concentration, time of peak concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (0-168 hours) for each agent were as follows: bepridil, 806 +/- 321 ng/mL, 2.6 +/- 1.6 hours, 4.87 +/- 1.21 micrograms.h/mL; McN-A-2600, 57 +/- 16 ng/mL, 4.2 +/- 2.0 hours, 0.53 +/- 0.29 microgram.h/mL; McN-6303, 284 +/- 120 ng/mL, 4.7 +/- 1.5 hours, 4.06 +/- 1.11 micrograms.h/mL. The bepridil area under the curve corrected for dose was similar to that in healthy volunteers, suggesting that plasma clearance was unaffected by severe renal impairment. None of the compounds were removed by dialysis, and no rebound in plasma concentrations was observed after the end of dialysis. The disposition of bepridil appears to be unchanged in patients with ESRD; and is unaffected by hemodialysis. Thus, no dosage adjustment will be required for ESRD patients and those receiving hemodialysis with cuprophane filters.

Disposition of misoprostol and its active metabolite in patients with normal and impaired renal function.

The disposition of misoprostol acid, the active metabolite of misoprostol, was studied in 48 subjects with various degrees of renal function after administration of a single 400 microgram oral dose of misoprostol. Subjects were assigned to one of four treatment groups: group 1, normal renal function with creatinine clearance (CLCR) 80-140 mL/min/1.73 m2; group 2, mild renal impairment with CLCR 50-79 mL/min/1.73 m2; group 3, moderate renal impairment with CLCR 20-49 mL/min/1.73 m2 or group 4, end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients maintained on hemodialysis. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach Cmax (tmax) for misoprostol acid tended to be larger in group 4 subjects; however, it failed to reach statistical significance. Although not statistically significant, in group 4 subjects the terminal half-life (t1/2) of misoprostol acid was almost twice as large (1.27 +/- 0.77 h) as in groups 1, 2, and 3 (0.70 +/- 0.72, 0.72 +/- 0.67, and 0.73 +/- 0.45 h, respectively). Misoprostol acid's total area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC0 infinity) was larger in group 4 subjects (1173.5 +/- 487.4 pg.h/mL) as compared with groups 1, 2, and 3 (421.4 +/- 263.1, 418.9 +/- 114.5, and 377.0 +/- 145.2 pg.h/mL, respectively; P < .05). The apparent total body clearance (CL) of misoprostol acid was statistically significantly smaller in group 4 subjects (0.094 +/- 0.044 L/kg/min) as compared only with group 3 subjects (0.284 +/- 0.102 L/kg/min). The dose of misoprostol may need to be reduced in ESRD patients on prolonged hemodialysis to prevent unnecessary high plasma levels of misoprostol acid and to avoid possible dose-related adverse effects.

The pharmacokinetics of aminoguanidine in end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis.

Aminoguanidine is an investigational agent that may slow or prevent many diabetes-related complications. Since the elimination of aminoguanidine is dependent on renal function, its pharmacokinetics was investigated in eight chronic renal failure patients maintained on hemodialysis. Each patient received 300 mg of aminoguanidine hydrochloride during both an interdialytic and an intradialytic period. During the interdialytic period, the maximum aminoguanidine concentration (Cmax) and time to reach Cmax was 4.5 micrograms/mL and 1.5 hours, respectively. The terminal elimination half-life in these patients was prolonged (37.9 hours). The renal clearance was 2.1 mL/min. Only 8.7% of the administered dose was recovered unchanged in the urine, which is markedly reduced from what is recovered in urine in subjects with normal renal function. There was a positive correlation between the renal clearance of aminoguanidine and the patients' residual renal function (P < 0.05). During hemodialysis, the half-life of aminoguanidine was shortened to 3.9 hours. The hemodialysis clearance of aminoguanidine was 203.6 mL/min. After cessation of hemodialysis, a significant rebound in plasma aminoguanidine concentrations (mean, 39%) was observed. Thus, the dose of aminoguanidine hydrochloride will need to be significantly reduced in patients with end-stage renal disease. Given the interdialytic and intradialytic pharmacokinetics of aminoguanidine, three times weekly dosing after each hemodialysis session is suggested.

Effects of hemodialysis on plasma protein binding of bepridil.

The effects of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and hemodialysis on the in vitro plasma protein binding of bepridil hydrochloride were investigated. The possible influence of bepridil metabolites on bepridil-protein binding in ESRD patients was also examined. Plasma samples were obtained from six patients with ESRD. Bepridil-plasma protein binding was measured by microequilibrium dialysis after addition of freshly prepared bepridil-14C (239 microCi/mg) at a final concentration of 2 micrograms/mL. The percentage of free bepridil in peripheral venous samples drawn on a nondialysis day was lower (i.e., binding was greater) in the patients with ESRD relative to previous observations in healthy subjects (0.15% +/- 0.04% versus 0.31% +/- 0.05% (mean +/- SD). The plasma concentrations of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), the principal bepridil binding protein, were also higher in ESRD patients (110 +/- 32 mg/dL) than previously reported in healthy subjects. Although hemodialysis resulted in significant increases in AAG, total protein, and albumin concentrations, no significant difference in bepridil-plasma protein binding was detected between predialysis and postdialysis peripheral venous samples in the presence (0.16 versus 0.18) or absence (0.20 versus 0.17) of bepridil metabolites. The percentage of free bepridil in plasma from both the arterial and venous limbs of the dialyzer during hemodialysis (means of free bepridil ranged from 0.24-0.28%) was higher than in samples drawn from a peripheral vein. This displacement of bepridil from its binding sites as blood passes through the dialyzer may have been owing to the presence of high local concentrations of plasticizers. Confirmation of this hypothesis will require further investigation.

A dose-ranging pharmacokinetics study of sodium diethyldithiocarbamate in normal healthy volunteers.

Sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) is an investigational modulator of the toxicity produced by cisplatin. The pharmacokinetics of DDTC were evaluated after administration of 200 mg/m2/hr (n = 8) and 400 mg/m2/hr (n = 7) DDTC as 4-hour intravenous infusions to normal male healthy volunteers. Diethyldithiocarbamate concentration at steady-state (Cpss) increased disproportionally from 27.0 +/- 7.6 microM for the low dose to 74.8 +/- 19.3 microM for the high dose, whereas total body clearance decreased from 23.83 +/- 8.23 mL/min/kg for the low dose to 15.48 +/- 2.72 mL/min/kg for the high dose (P < 0.05). However, the volume of distribution in the terminal phase remained unchanged. Diethyldithiocarbamate terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) increased from 3.74 +/- 1.10 minutes for the low dose to 6.08 +/- 1.07 minutes for the high dose (P < 0.005). The data were then fitted using a one-compartment open model with zero-order infusion and Michaelis-Menten elimination kinetics. The Km for DDTC was estimated to be 124.3 +/- 19.9 microM, whereas the Vm was estimated to be 3.67 +/- 1.15 mumol/min/kg. However, DDTC t1/2 beta was independent of DDTC concentrations, suggesting that the nonlinearity in DDTC kinetics does not exactly follow Michaelis-Menten elimination kinetics. Thus, DDTC pharmacokinetics are dose dependent and may not be concentration dependent. Clinically, DDTC Cpss will increase nonlinearly with an increase in dose.

Pharmacokinetics of tazobactam M1 metabolite after administration of piperacillin/tazobactam in subjects with renal impairment.

Tazobactam is a new derivative of penicillinic acid sulfone, which functions as an irreversible inhibitor of many beta-lactamases. The disposition of tazobactam M1 metabolite after intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 3 g of piperacillin/0.375 g of tazobactam was evaluated in 26 subjects with various degrees of renal impairment. Participants in the study were 18 subjects with creatinine clearances (ClCR) ranging from 7.4-41.8 mL/min, 4 subjects maintained on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and 4 subjects undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD). The pharmacokinetic parameters of piperacillin and tazobactam were evaluated and were similar to previous reports. Tazobactam M1 metabolite maximum plasma concentration increased as renal function declined. The terminal elimination half-life and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the tazobactam M1 metabolite increased as renal function declined. The mean rate of recovery of the tazobactam M1 metabolite in hemodialysate during a 3- to 4.2-hour HD session 1 hour after the i.v. infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam was 25.3%. However, when HD was performed at 36-48 hours after the i.v. infusion, 57.6% of the tazobactam dose was recovered as M1 metabolite, suggesting further conversion of tazobactam to M1 metabolite. Peritoneal dialysis removed 15.8% (n = 2) of the tazobactam dose as the M1 metabolite. Using a dose of 3 g of piperacillin/0.375 g of tazobactam, the predicted maximum steady-state plasma concentrations of the tazobactam M1 metabolite are 14.6 micrograms/mL, 34.8 micrograms/mL, and 48.8 micrograms/mL for subjects with ClCR 20-40 mL/min (every 6 hour dosing), ClCR < 20 mL/min (every 8 hour dosing), and on CAPD (every 12 hour dosing), respectively.

Evaluation of two intravenous single-bolus methods for measuring effective renal plasma flow.

This open-label, three-way crossover study examined the feasibility of measuring effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) using a single intravenous (IV) bolus method. Eight healthy young adults (four women aged 28 +/- 5 years [mean +/- SD] and four men aged 30 +/- 7 years) received on separate days an IV bolus of p-aminohippurate (PAH) 10 mg/kg, an IV bolus of phenolsulfonphthalein (PSP) 1 mg/kg, and the standard constant-rate IV infusion of PAH. The renal clearance (CLR) and plasma clearance (CLP) of PAH after constant infusion were 623.7 +/- 62.9 and 869.0 +/- 58.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. After PAH bolus injection, CLR and CLP were 538.9 +/- 110.8 and 677.6 +/- 122.4 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. After PSP bolus injection, CLR and CLP were 252.8 +/- 57.9 and 350.0 +/- 41.3 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The ERPF measured by PSP bolus injection was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than by PAH infusion. The CLP of PAH after IV bolus injection was significantly lower than after IV infusion when men and women were analyzed together (P < 0.05). However, there appeared to be a greater magnitude of difference between the CLR after IV bolus and infusion of PAH for women than for men. In summary, PSP administered as an IV bolus injection does not appear to be a reliable marker of ERPF. The difference in ERPF determined by the PAH infusion and bolus methods may require further evaluation.