Quality of life in breast cancer patients and surgical results of immediate tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of prior radiotherapy (RT) as well as postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and on surgical/aesthetic outcomes in patients with expander-/implant-based delayed immediate reconstruction (EIBR) compared to patients that underwent EIBR without any RT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: QoL was assessed by BREAST-Q, the surgical/aesthetic outcome by a structured examination and a picture analysis (BCCT.CORE software) and subsequently compared between the three cohorts. RESULTS: Of 161 eligible patients, 97 followed the invitation (no RT n = 54, 9 of them with bilateral EIBR; PMRT n = 26; history of RT n = 15). The surgical/aesthetic results were better in the RT-naive cohort than in the PMRT cohort, but satisfaction with outcome and psychosocial well-being were better in the PMRT cohort. The RT-naive cohort showed (significantly) higher scores in satisfaction with breast, satisfaction with implant and sexual well-being compared to the history of RT cohort, although satisfaction with outcome was comparable. The PMRT cohort reached significantly more points in almost all categories and better BCCT.CORE and examination results than the history of RT cohort. Of all patients, 92.7%, 84.6% and 78.6% (RT naive, PMRT, history of RT) would agree to undergo EIBR again. CONCLUSION: EIBR results in acceptable QoL and surgical results. In patients with a prior RT, QoL is significantly lower and surgical results are significantly worse. However, high acceptance rates suggest EIBR being a justifiable option even for this group. Prospective studies and long-term follow-up are required for definitive conclusions.

[Breast Cancer: Diagnostics and Therapy - the Most Important Facts for Internists]. / Mammakarzinom: Diagnostik und Therapie ­ das Wichtigste für den Internisten.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reviewing this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the epidemiology of breast cancer, its incidence and impact. 2. Appreciate the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. 3. Understand the concept of comprehensive breast cancer management and its multidisciplinarity. 4. Be knowledgeable about the entire process required to manage breast cancer, since the early diagnosis until the management of non breast related conditions derived from the treatment. 5. Position their specialty and knowledge in the process and know clearly their role and involvement in the management of the patients with breast cancer. SUMMARY: Breast carcinoma accounts for the majority of the malignant diseases in women. In Germany has an estimated incidence of 70 000 new cases per year, which is 30 % of all the malignancies in women, predominantly between 45 and 83 years old, although it can affect as well younger women and men, the latter, in a very low rate. It is accountable for 17.4 % mortality in the country.The high frequency and impact of the mammary carcinoma had lead to the establishment and standardization of screening programs, encompassing self examination, early and regular consultation, sonography and mammography, aimed to the early detection not only of primary disease but also in recurrent or relapsing disease, and continued following up after treatment. Several treatment strategies and tools have been developed and are being chosen in accordance to the histology and biology of the tumor, the patient condition, the social and familiar status, with the increase of conservation of the mammary gland either by adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapies, with radiotherapy or by breast conserving surgery, improving therefore the quality of living without compromising the disease free survival. Next step in the process is the follow up, intended to maintain the patients the healthiest possible, not only from the malignancy but also minimizing the effects of the treatment strategies, incorporating lifestyle improving measures e.g. sports and nutrition, and alternative medicine resources like acupuncture, hence improving the disease free survival rate, the overall survival and diminishing the disease related impact yet personal, familiar, social and economical.The aim of this CME is to give a thorough review of this multifactorial entity, helping the healthcare professional understand the scientific aspects of it and, through comprehensive reading, provide a clear understanding of their role and degree of involvement in the breast cancer management process.

Improved systemic treatment for early breast cancer improves cure rates, modifies metastatic pattern and shortens post-metastatic survival: 35-year results from the Munich Cancer Registry.

PURPOSE: Systemic therapies (ATHs) in early breast cancer have improved the survival of breast cancer (BC) patients in recent decades. The magnitude of the changes in overall, metastasis-free (MFS) and post-metastatic (PMS) survival and in the metastasis (MET) pattern will be described. PATIENT AND METHODS: We analysed 60,227 patients with a diagnosis of T-N-M0 BC between 1978 and 2013 and 11,983 patients with metastases (MET) in the Munich Cancer Registry. Patients will be divided into four time periods to identify relationships between BC and METs. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to explore the impact of the BC subtype and MET status on survival with the time periods as surrogate markers for ATH evolution. RESULTS: During the observation period, 5-year relative survival has improved from 80.3 to 93.6% with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.54 (P < 0.0001). Successful implementation of ATH has changed the MET pattern. The percentage of liver and CNS METs has more than doubled, the rate of lung METs remains stable, and the rate of bone METs has been reduced by approximately 50%. MFS has been prolonged with a hazard ratio 0.75 (P < 0.0001), but PMS has declined (hazard ratio 1.36; P < 0.0001); however, effects of adjuvant and palliative treatments cannot be separated. These results do not contradict improvements in advanced BC and do not suggest alterations of MET tumour biology by ATH. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past three decades, ATHs have dramatically improved patient survival after BC diagnosis-most likely, by eradicating prevalent micro-METs; as a result, the MET pattern has changed. Eradicating only a portion of the first METs results in delaying the onset of subsequent MET, which leads to an apparently paradoxical effect: an extension of the MET-free interval and a reduction in PMS.

Survival of de novo stage IV breast cancer patients over three decades.

BACKGROUND: De novo stage IV breast cancer patients (BCIV) depict a clinical picture not influenced by adjuvant therapy. Therefore, the time-dependent impact of changes in diagnostics and treatments on progression and survival can best be evaluated in this subgroup. METHODS: BCIV patients from 1978 to 2013 registered in the Munich Cancer Registry were divided into four periods, and the trends were analysed. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods, and prognostic factors were fitted with Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Between 1978 and 2013, 88,759 patients were diagnosed with 92,807 cases of invasive and non-invasive BC. Of these patients, 4756 patients had distant metastases (MET) at diagnosis. The 5-year survival rate improved from 17.4 to 24.7%, while the pattern of metastases did not change. Improved staging diagnostics, a screening programme and primary systemic therapy changed the composition of prognostic strata. Patients with a similar composition as the 1978-1987 cohort exhibited a median survival difference of 13 months; however, neither univariate nor multivariate analysis showed a survival effect for the four periods as a surrogate indicator for changing treatments. HER2+ patients have with 27.6 months a slightly longer survival than all other BCIV patients. CONCLUSIONS: Survival of de novo BCIV has only modestly improved since the late 1970s, partially masked by changing distributions of prognostic factors due to changes in diagnostics.

Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients by circulating apoptotic biomarkers nucleosomes, DNAse, cytokeratin-18 fragments and survivin.

Biomarkers predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally confined breast cancer (LBC) are highly needed. We prospectively assessed serial blood levels of apoptotic biomarkers nucleosomes, DNAse activity, cytokeratin-18 fragments (M30) and survivin in 51 LBC patients and correlated them with response to neoadjuvant treatment and established tumor markers. As controls, we used 31 healthy subjects, 13 patients with benign diseases and 28 with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Levels of nucleosomes and survivin were elevated in LBC and MBC while M30, CEA and CA 15-3 levels were only elevated in MBC. During neoadjuvant chemotherapy, LBC patients with no change of disease (N=13) had significantly higher pretherapeutic levels of nucleosomes than patients with remission (N=38). We conclude that apoptotic biomarkers bear valuable information for diagnosis and therapy response prediction in LBC patients.

Circulating immunogenic cell death biomarkers HMGB1 and RAGE in breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients aims at preoperative reduction of tumor volume for better resection results and prognosis. As not all patients respond to neoadjuvant therapy, predictive biomarkers are needed for more efficient individual management. In prospectively collected sera of 51 consecutive locally confined breast cancer (LBC) patients receiving preoperative, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, value level kinetics of soluble high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) as well as the established breast cancer biomarkers CA 15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were investigated and correlated with therapy response objectified by pathological staging at surgery. In addition, biomarkers were measured in sera of 30 healthy controls (HC), 13 patients with benign breast diseases, and 28 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Pretherapeutic levels of soluble HMGB1 were decreased in MBC, while sRAGE was already decreased in LBC. In contrast, CA 15-3 and CEA were strongly elevated in MBC, but not in LBC. Combination of sRAGE and CA 15-3 enabled best discrimination of LBC from HC (AUC 78.2 %; sens 58 % at 95 % spec), while CA15-3 and CEA discriminated best between MBC and all controls (AUC 90.9 %; sens 70 % at 95 % spec). In LBC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nine patients achieved complete remission (CR), 29 achieved partial remission (PR), while 13 had no change of disease (NC). NC patients tended to have higher HMGB1 and lower sRAGE levels before therapy onset (p = 0.056 and p = 0.054), while CA 15-3 and CEA did not predict therapeutic outcome. Furthermore, kinetics of HMGB1 during therapy correlated with efficacy of the treatment (p = 0.053). Markers of immunogenic cell death are valuable for the diagnosis of MBC and early estimation of response to neoadjuvant therapy in LBC patients.