RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA) is a rapidly increasing technique for coronary imaging; however, it exposes patients to ionising radiation. We examined the impact of dose reduction techniques using ECG-triggering, kVp/mAs reduction and high-pitch modes on radiation exposure in a large Australian tertiary CCTA service. METHODS: Data on acquisition modes and dose exposure were prospectively collected on all CCTA scans from November 2009 to March 2014 at an Australian tertiary care centre. A dose reduction algorithm was developed using published techniques and implemented with education of medical staff, radiographers and referrers. Associations of CCTA acquisition to radiation over time were analysed with multivariate regression. Specificity in positive CCTA was assessed by correlation with invasive coronary angiography. RESULTS: 3333 CCTAs were analysed. Mean radiation dose decreased from 8.4 mSv to 5.3, 4.4, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.8 mSv (P < 0.001) per year. Patient characteristics were unchanged. Dose reduction strategies using ECG-triggering, kVp/mAs reduction accounted for 91% of the decrease. High-pitch scanning reduced dose by an additional 9%. Lower dose was independently related to lower kVp, heart rate, tube current modulation, BMI, prospective triggering and high-pitch mode (P < 0.01). CCTA specificity remained unchanged despite dose reduction. CONCLUSION: Implementation of evidence-based CCTA dose reduction algorithm and staff education programme resulted in a 67% reduction in radiation exposure, while maintaining diagnostic specificity. This approach is widely applicable to clinical practice for the performance of CCTA.
Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Austrália , Angiografia Coronária/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Centros de Atenção Terciária/normas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normasRESUMO
Introduction This article summarises the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand position statement on coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. CAC scoring is a non-invasive method for quantifying coronary artery calcification using computed tomography. It is a marker of atherosclerotic plaque burden and the strongest independent predictor of future myocardial infarction and mortality. CAC scoring provides incremental risk information beyond traditional risk calculators such as the Framingham Risk Score. Its use for risk stratification is confined to primary prevention of cardiovascular events, and can be considered as individualised coronary risk scoring for intermediate risk patients, allowing reclassification to low or high risk based on the score. Medical practitioners should carefully counsel patients before CAC testing, which should only be undertaken if an alteration in therapy, including embarking on pharmacotherapy, is being considered based on the test result. Main recommendations CAC scoring should primarily be performed on individuals without coronary disease aged 45-75 years (absolute 5-year cardiovascular risk of 10-15%) who are asymptomatic. CAC scoring is also reasonable in lower risk groups (absolute 5-year cardiovascular risk, < 10%) where risk scores traditionally underestimate risk (eg, family history of premature CVD) and in patients with diabetes aged 40-60 years. We recommend aspirin and a high efficacy statin in high risk patients, defined as those with a CAC score ≥ 400, or a CAC score of 100-399 and above the 75th percentile for age and sex. It is reasonable to treat patients with CAC scores ≥ 100 with aspirin and a statin. It is reasonable not to treat asymptomatic patients with a CAC score of zero. Changes in management as a result of this statement Cardiovascular risk is reclassified according to CAC score. High risk patients are treated with a high efficacy statin and aspirin. Very low risk patients (ie, CAC score of zero) do not benefit from treatment.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco/métodos , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcificação Vascular/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Doenças Assintomáticas , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placa Aterosclerótica/diagnóstico por imagem , Placa Aterosclerótica/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Primária/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The application of left ventricular (LV) global strain by speckle-tracking is becoming more widespread, with the potential for incorporation into routine clinical echocardiography in selected patients. There are no guidelines or recommendations for the training requirements to achieve competency. The aim of this study was to determine the learning curve for global strain analysis and determine the number of studies that are required for independent reporting. METHODS: Three groups of novice observers (cardiology fellows, cardiac sonographers, medical students) received the same standardized training module prior to undertaking retrospective global strain analysis on 100 patients over a period of 3 months. To assess the effect of learning, quartiles of 25 patients were read successively by each blinded observer, and the results were compared to expert for correlation. RESULTS: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) had uniform learning curves and was the easiest to learn, requiring a minimum of 50 patients to achieve expert competency (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9) in all three groups over a period of 3 months. Prior background knowledge in echocardiography is an influential factor affecting the learning for interobserver reproducibility and time efficiency. Short-axis strain analysis using global circumferential stain and global radial strain did not yield a comprehensive learning curve, and expert level was not achieved by the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant learning curve associated with LV strain analysis. We recommend a minimum of 50 studies for training to achieve competency in GLS analysis.
Assuntos
Cardiologia/educação , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Curva de Aprendizado , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
AIMS: We aimed to assess intervendor agreement of global (GLS) and regional longitudinal strain by vendor-specific software after EACVI/ASE Industry Task Force Standardization Initiatives for Deformation Imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent prospective dataset acquisitions on the same day by the same operator using two commercially available cardiac ultrasound systems (GE Vivid E9 and Philips iE33). GLS and regional peak longitudinal strain were analyzed offline using corresponding vendor-specific software (EchoPAC BT13 and QLAB version 10.3). Absolute mean GLS measurements were similar between the two vendors (GE -17.5 ± 5.2% vs. Philips -18.9 ± 5.1%, P = 0.15). There was excellent intervendor correlation of GLS by the same observer [r = 0.94, P < 0.0001; bias -1.3%, 95% CI limits of agreement (LOA) -4.8 to 2.2%). Intervendor comparison for regional longitudinal strain by coronary artery territories distribution were: LAD: r = 0.85, P < 0.0001; bias 0.5%, LOA -5.3 to 6.4%; RCA: r = 0.88, P < 0.0001; bias -2.4%, LOA -8.6 to 3.7%; LCX: r = 0.76, P < 0.0001; bias -5.3%, LOA -10.6 to 2.0%. Intervendor comparison for regional longitudinal strain by LV levels were: basal: r = 0.86, P < 0.0001; bias -3.6%, LOA -9.9 to 2.0%; mid: r = 0.90, P < 0.0001; bias -2.6%, LOA -7.8 to 2.6%; apical: r = 0.74; P < 0.0001; bias -1.3%, LOA -9.4 to 6.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Intervendor agreement in GLS and regional strain measurements have significantly improved after the EACVI/ASE Task Force Strain Standardization Initiatives. However, significant wide LOA still exist, especially for regional strain measurements, which remains relevant when considering vendor-specific software for serial measurements.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia/instrumentação , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Estudos Prospectivos , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has been widely used to assess myocardial perfusion and scar and is the non-invasive gold standard for identification of focal myocardial fibrosis. However, the late gadolinium enhancement technique is limited in its accuracy for absolute quantification and assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis by technical and pathophysiological features. CMR relaxometry, incorporating T1 mapping, has emerged as an accurate, reproducible, highly sensitive, and quantitative technique for the assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in a number of disease states. We comprehensively review the physics behind CMR relaxometry, the evidence base, and the clinical applications of this emerging technique.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many echocardiographic parameters have been proposed to evaluate right ventricular (RV) systolic function. We comprehensively assessed a wide range of quantitative echocardiographic parameters in a single cohort compared with same-day cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS AND RESULTS: 92 subjects were examined prospectively: Group 1 consisted of 46 healthy controls (21 males, 33.4 ± 11.4 years), Group 2 consisted of 46 patients (20 males, 38.5 ± 18.9 years) undergoing RV functional assessment by CMR (1.5 T). Echocardiography was performed on the same day as CMR; fractional area change (RVFAC), myocardial performance index via spectral Doppler (RVMPI), RVMPI via Doppler tissue imaging (RVMPI-DTI), peak systolic myocardial velocity by DTI (RVSm), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), speckle tracking strain, and three dimensional right ventricular ejection fraction (3DE-RV). Linear regression, Bland-Altman and receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. At ROC analysis, the most predictive echocardiographic methods were; RVFAC (AUC = 0.892), RVMPI (AUC 0.785), TAPSE (AUC 0.849) and 3DE-RV (AUC 0.909). 3DE-RV appeared the most accurate compared to CMR, although underestimated true RV volumes. CONCLUSION: As compared to CMR; 3DE-RV, RVFAC, TAPSE and RVMPI were the most reliable predictors of RV function. These parameters can be recommended for clinical use.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Longitudinal strain (LS) is a quantitative parameter that adds incremental value to wall motion analysis. The aim of this study was to compare the reproducibility of LS derived from Doppler tissue imaging and speckle-tracking between an expert and a novice strain reader during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). METHODS: Forty-one patients (mean age, 65 ± 15 years; mean ejection fraction, 58 ± 11%) underwent DSE per clinical protocol. Global LS derived from speckle-tracking and regional LS derived from both speckle-tracking and Doppler tissue imaging were measured twice by an expert strain reader and also measured twice by a novice strain reader. Intraobserver and interobserver analyses were performed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and absolute difference values (mean ± SD). RESULTS: Global LS measured by the expert strain reader demonstrated high intraobserver measurement reproducibility (rest: ICC = 0.95, absolute difference = 5.5 ± 4.9%; low dose: ICC = 0.96, absolute difference = 5.7 ± 3.7%; peak dose: ICC = 0.87, absolute difference = 11.4 ± 8.4%). Global LS measured by the novice strain reader also demonstrated high intraobserver reproducibility (rest: ICC = 0.97, absolute difference = 4.1 ± 3.4%; low dose: ICC = 0.94, absolute difference = 5.4 ± 5.9%; peak dose: ICC = 0.94, absolute difference = 6.1 ± 4.8%). Global LS also showed high interobserver agreement between the expert and novice readers at all stages of DSE (rest: ICC = 0.90, absolute difference = 8.5 ± 7.5%; low dose: ICC = 0.90, absolute difference = 8.9 ± 7.1%; peak dose: ICC = 0.87, absolute difference = 10.8 ± 8.4%). Of all parameters studied, LS derived from Doppler tissue imaging had relatively low interobserver and intraobserver agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Global LS is highly reproducible during all stages of DSE. This variable is a potentially reliable and reproducible measure of myocardial deformation.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia Doppler/métodos , Ecocardiografia sob Estresse/métodos , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glucosinolatos , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Volume SistólicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether global strains derived from three-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) are as accurate as left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained by two-dimensional (2D) and 3D echocardiography in the quantification of LV function. METHODS: Two-dimensional and 3D echocardiography and 2D and 3D STE were performed in 88 patients (LVEF range, 17%-79%). Two-dimensional and 3D global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain, and global area strain were quantified and correlated with LV function determined by 2D and 3D echocardiographic LVEF. Reproducibility, feasibility, and duration of study to perform 3D STE were assessed by independent, blinded observers. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients (89%) underwent 3D STE. All 3D speckle-tracking echocardiographic parameters had strong correlations with assessment of LV function determined by 2D and 3D echocardiographic LVEF. Three-dimensional GCS was the best marker of LV function (r = -0.89, P < .0001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that 3D speckle-tracking echocardiographic parameters were particularly useful in identifying LV dysfunction (LVEF < 50%). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated areas under the curve of 0.97 for 3D GCS, 0.96 for 3D global radial strain, 0.95 for 3D global area strain, and 0.87 for 3D GLS. An optimal 3D GCS cutoff value of magnitude < -12% predicted LV dysfunction (LVEF obtained by 2D echocardiography < 50%) with 92% sensitivity and 90% specificity. There was good correlation between 2D GLS and 3D GLS (r = 0.85, P < .001; mean difference, -1.7 ± 6.5%). Good intraobserver, interobserver, and test-retest agreements were seen with 3D STE. Time for image acquisition to postprocessing analysis was significantly reduced with 3D STE (3.7 ± 1.0 minutes) compared with 2D STE (4.6 ± 1.5 min) (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Global strain by 3D STE is a promising novel alternative to quantitatively assess LV function. Three-dimensional STE is reproducible, feasible, and time efficient.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia Tridimensional/métodos , Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade/métodos , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Algoritmos , Módulo de Elasticidade , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Coronary CT angiography and coronary calcium scoring offer a new approach to the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). They hold significant promise in improving patient outcomes, through identification of atherosclerosis and improved risk assessment. Coronary calcium scoring has proven predictive value concerning the occurrence of future cardiovascular events and outperforms current risk evaluation methods such as the Framingham Risk Score. Coronary CT angiography allows visualisation of the coronary artery lumen, detection of stenoses as well as visualisation of both calcified and non-calcified plaque. The accuracy of coronary CT angiography to detect obstructive coronary artery disease has been established by numerous trials. In particular the negative predictive value of the test approaches 100% in low and intermediate risk groups. Outcomes data demonstrate significant prognostic ability of coronary CT angiography. Modern techniques allow substantial reduction of dose values and radiation exposure of coronary CT angiography has significantly fallen. Coronary CT angiography can be reliably performed with doses similar to the level of annual background radiation, and less than one-third of a Tc Sestamibi scan. Coronary CT angiography has been approved for Medicare reimbursement for specific indications when performed by accredited providers. High quality examinations, experience and careful patient selection and preparation are required to ensure optimal results of coronary CT angiography, and to guide clinical decisions.
Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gated Blood Pool Imaging (GBPI) has low inter-test variability compared to echocardiography, and is often used when accurate repeated measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction are required such as in the surveillance of post-transplant patients. The aim of this study was to determine if cardiac MRI (CMR) could replace Gated Blood Pool Imaging for annual assessment of left ventricular (LV) function in the surveillance of patients post-cardiac transplantation. METHODS: Forty-nine patients at various stages of post-cardiac transplantation presenting for annual review underwent LV functional assessment with GBPI and CMR. LV ejection fractions (EF) obtained from the two methods were compared and limits of agreement determined. RESULTS: The mean EF (plus and minus two standard deviations) was 58.3+/-18% for GBPI and 57.6+/-18% for CMR. The two methods were found to provide clinically equivalent results. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of LVEF with CMR offers comparable values to GBPI in post-heart transplant patients. However, CMR also allows quantitative volumetric analysis of ventricular volumes and assessment of wall motion and valvular function. As is now accepted in native heart assessment, CMR should be considered the "gold standard" for post-transplant volumetric and functional evaluation. CMR offers information over-and-above traditional imaging modalities.
Assuntos
Imagem do Acúmulo Cardíaco de Comporta , Transplante de Coração , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Volume SistólicoRESUMO
Chromobacterium violaceum infection is uncommon but potentially fatal, with a clinical picture similar to melioidosis but with different antibiotic sensitivities and treatment. This infection can involve any organ, but we believe this is the first reported case of C. violaceum endocarditis.