Socioeconomic risk factors for long-term opioid use: A national registry-linkage study.

BACKGROUND: Opioid use has increased substantially as a treatment for chronic pain, although harms from long-term opioid therapy outweigh the benefits. More knowledge about factors associated with long-term opioid use is needed. We aimed to investigate the association between socioeconomic status and long-term opioid use in the period 2010-2019. METHODS: This was a nested case-control study in which the cases were all persons ≥18 years with long-term opioid use, that is use of opioids for more than 3 months (N = 215,642). Cases were matched on gender, age and index year (first long-term use period) with four controls who filled at least one opioid prescription, but never developed long-term opioid use in the study period (N = 862,568). We performed a logistic regression analysis adjusted for relevant confounders, stratified on age groups (18-67 years and 68 years and above). RESULTS: In the younger age group, long-term opioid use was associated with low education (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 1.54; 95% confidence interval, CI [1.51-1.57]), low income (1.33 [1.31-1.36]), being unemployed (1.40 [1.38-1.42]) and receiving disability pension (1.36 [1.33-1.38]). Weaker associations were found for living in a single-person household or in a dense geographical area. Similar associations were found for the older age group. CONCLUSION: We found that low socioeconomic status was associated with long-term opioid use both among people in working age and older people. These results indicate a need for social and financial support for non-pharmacological treatment of chronic pain among people with lower socioeconomic status. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that people with low socioeconomic status are at higher risk of developing long-term opioid use. In the clinical setting, physicians should consider socioeconomic status when prescribing opioids for chronic pain. Non-pharmacological treatment options funded by public health services should be prioritized to those with low socioeconomic status as long-term opioid use in chronic pain patients is not recommended.

Use of antipsychotics and antidepressants in first-episode psychotic depression: A nationwide register-based study.

BACKGROUND: According to guidelines, psychotic depression should be treated with both antipsychotics and antidepressants, but current practice is largely unknown. We investigated the prevalence of antipsychotic and antidepressant use in first-episode psychotic depression and factors related to antipsychotic use after the diagnosis. METHODS: We identified individuals aged 16-65 with a first-episode diagnosis of psychotic depression (ICD-10 codes F32.3, F33.3) from nationwide data linkage of Finnish healthcare and population registers during 2000-2018. Point prevalence was measured as 2-week time windows every 3 months, investigating whether the individual had a modeled drug use period ongoing during the window or not, censoring to death and end of data linkage. RESULTS: The study population included 18,490 individuals (58.0% women; mean age 39.9 years, standard deviation 14.7). The prevalence of use for antidepressants (75.0%), antipsychotics (56.4%), and both (50.0%) were highest at 3 months after the diagnosis. The prevalence declined to 51.8%, 34.1%, and 28.7%, respectively, at 3 years after the diagnosis. In a logistic regression analysis, younger age (adjusted odds ratio < 25 vs. ≥55, 0.82 [95% confidence interval 0.73-0.91]), eating disorders (0.78 [0.66-0.92]), substance use disorders (0.80 [0.73-0.87]), and occupational inactivity (0.80 [0.73-0.87]) were associated with decreased odds of using antipsychotics at 3 months after diagnosis. Increased odds were found for diagnosis from inpatient care (1.74 [1.62-1.86]), and later year of cohort entry (2010-2014 vs. 2000-2004, 1.56 [1.42-1.70]). CONCLUSION: At most, half of the individuals with newly diagnosed psychotic depression used both antidepressants and antipsychotics. This likely has a negative impact on treatment success.

Mental disorder prevalence in chronic pain patients using opioid versus non-opioid analgesics: A registry-linkage study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain and mental disorders are leading causes of disability worldwide. Individuals with chronic pain are more likely to experience mental disorders compared to individuals without chronic pain, but large-scale estimates are lacking. We aimed to calculate overall prevalence of mental health diagnoses from primary and secondary care among individuals treated for chronic pain in 2019 and to compare prevalence among chronic pain patients receiving opioid versus non-opioid analgesics, according to age and gender. METHODS: It is a population-based cohort study. Linked data from nationwide health registers on dispensed drugs and diagnoses from primary (ICPC-2) and secondary (ICD-10) health care. Chronic pain patients were identified as all patients over 18 years of age filling at least one prescription of an analgesic reimbursed for non-malignant chronic pain in both 2018 and 2019 (N = 139,434, 69.3% women). RESULTS: Prevalence of any mental health diagnosis was 35.6% (95% confidence interval: 35.4%-35.9%) when sleep diagnoses were included and 29.0% (28.8%-29.3%) when excluded. The most prevalent diagnostic categories were sleep disorders (14% [13.8%-14.2%]), depressive and related disorders (10.1% [9.9%-10.2%]) and phobia and other anxiety disorders (5.7% [5.5%-5.8%]). Prevalence of most diagnostic categories was higher in the group using opioids compared to non-opioids. The group with the highest overall prevalence was young women (18-44 years) using opioids (50.1% [47.2%-53.0%]). CONCLUSIONS: Mental health diagnoses are common in chronic pain patients receiving analgesics, particularly among young individuals and opioid users. The combination of opioid use and high psychiatric comorbidity suggests that prescribers should attend to mental health in addition to somatic pain. SIGNIFICANCE: This large-scale study with nation-wide registry data supports previous findings of high psychiatric burden in chronic pain patients. Opioid users had significantly higher prevalence of mental health diagnoses, regardless of age and gender compared to users of non-opioid analgesics. Opioid users with chronic pain therefore stand out as a particularly vulnerable group and should be followed up closely by their physician to ensure they receive sufficient care for both their mental and somatic symptoms.

Prescription opioids among older adults: ten years of data across five countries.

BACKGROUND: Opioid use has increased globally in the recent decade. Although pain remains a significant problem among older adults, susceptibility to opioid-related harms highlights the importance of careful opioid therapy monitoring on individual and societal levels. We aimed to describe the trends of prescription opioid utilisation among residents aged ≥65 in all Nordic countries during 2009-2018. METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional measurements of opioid utilisation in 2009-2018 from nationwide registers of dispensed drugs in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. The measures included annual opioid prevalence, defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DIDs), and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per user per day. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, an average of 808,584 of adults aged ≥65 used opioids yearly in all five countries; an average annual prevalence of 17.0%. During this time period, the prevalence decreased in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden due to declining codeine and/or tramadol use. Iceland had the highest opioid prevalence in 2009 (30.2%), increasing to 31.7% in 2018. In the same period, DIDs decreased in all five countries, and ranged from 28.3 in Finland to 58.5 in Denmark in 2009, and from 23.0 in Finland to 54.6 in Iceland in 2018. MMEs/user/day ranged from 4.4 in Iceland to 19.6 in Denmark in 2009, and from 4.6 in Iceland to 18.8 in Denmark in 2018. In Finland, Norway, and Sweden, MMEs/user/day increased from 2009 to 2018, mainly due to increasing oxycodone utilisation. CONCLUSIONS: The stable or decreasing opioid utilisation prevalence among a majority of older adults across the Nordic countries coincides with an increase in treatment intensity in 2009-2018. We found large cross-national differences despite similarities across the countries' cultures and healthcare systems. For the aged population, national efforts should be placed on improving pain management and monitoring future trends of especially oxycodone utilisation.

Differences in analgesic use in community-dwelling persons with and without Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting findings about analgesic use among persons with cognitive impairment compared to cognitively intact older persons. The objective of our study was to investigate the prevalence of analgesic use in community-dwelling persons with and without Alzheimer's disease (AD), within six months after AD diagnosis and to find out factors associated with the use of analgesics and specific analgesic groups. METHOD: We utilized data from register based MEDALZ (Medication use and Alzheimer's disease) cohort consisting of all community-dwelling persons diagnosed with AD during 2005-2011 in Finland and their matched comparison persons without AD. Altogether, 67,215 persons with AD and one comparison person for each case were included. Drug use data were collected from the Prescription Register and comorbidities from Special Reimbursement and Hospital Discharge Registers. RESULTS: Statistically significant (p < 0.001) yet mostly small differences were found for analgesics use: analgesics were used by 34.9% and 33.5% of persons with and without AD, respectively. Paracetamol was the most frequently used analgesic both among persons with (25.0%) and without AD (19.1%). Persons with AD used less frequently NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs) (13.2% vs. 17.3%) and mild opioids (5.0% vs. 7.1%), while the use of strong opioids was more common in comparison to persons without AD (1.3% vs. 1.1%, respectively). Analgesic users were more likely women, aged ≥80 years, had asthma/COPD, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, hip fracture, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and lower socioeconomic position. CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to evaluate the adequateness of pain relief in older persons with and without AD. SIGNIFICANCE: Persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) used more frequently paracetamol and less frequently NSAIDs and mild opioids. A decreasing trend of NSAID use was observed among persons with AD during the study period.