Intraoperative MRI-Guided Resection Is Not Superior to 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Guidance in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Prospective Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Prospective data suggested a superiority of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) over 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) for achieving complete resections of contrast enhancement in glioblastoma surgery. We investigated this hypothesis in a prospective clinical trial and correlated residual disease volumes with clinical outcome in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: This is a prospective controlled multicenter parallel-group trial with two center-specific treatment arms (5-ALA and iMRI) and blinded evaluation. The primary end point was complete resection of contrast enhancement on early postoperative MRI. We assessed resectability and extent of resection by an independent blinded centralized review of preoperative and postoperative MRI with 1-mm slices. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), patient-reported quality of life, and clinical parameters. RESULTS: We recruited 314 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas at 11 German centers. A total of 127 patients in the 5-ALA and 150 in the iMRI arm were analyzed in the as-treated analysis. Complete resections, defined as a residual tumor ≤0.175 cm³, were achieved in 90 patients (78%) in the 5-ALA and 115 (81%) in the iMRI arm (P = .79). Incision-suture times (P < .001) were significantly longer in the iMRI arm (316 v 215 [5-ALA] minutes). Median PFS and OS were comparable in both arms. The lack of any residual contrast enhancing tumor (0 cm³) was a significant favorable prognostic factor for PFS (P < .001) and OS (P = .048), especially in methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase unmethylated tumors (P = .006). CONCLUSION: We could not confirm superiority of iMRI over 5-ALA for achieving complete resections. Neurosurgical interventions in newly diagnosed glioblastoma shall aim for safe complete resections with 0 cm³ contrast-enhancing residual disease, as any other residual tumor volume is a negative predictor for PFS and OS.

Frame-based stereotactic biopsy of deep-seated and midline structures in 511 procedures: feasibility, risk profile, and diagnostic yield.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of frame-based stereotactic biopsies (SB) in lesions located in deep-seated and midline structures of the brain to analyze these parameters in comparison to other brain areas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective, tertiary care single-center analysis, we identified all patients who received SB for lesions localized in deep-seated and midline structures (corpus callosum, basal ganglia, pineal region, sella, thalamus, and brainstem) between January 1996 and June 2015. Study participants were between 1 and 82 years. We evaluated the feasibility, procedural complications (mortality, transient and permanent morbidity), and diagnostic yield. We further performed a risk analysis of factors influencing the latter parameters. Chi-square test, Student t test, and Mann-Whitney rank-sum test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-nine patients receiving 511 SB procedures (median age 48.5 years, range 1-82; median Karnofsky Performance Score 80%, range 50-100%, 43.8% female/56.2% male) were identified. Lesions were localized in the corpus callosum (29.5%), basal ganglia (17.0%), pineal region (11.5%), sella (7.8%), thalamus (4.3%), brainstem (28.8%), and others (1.1%). Procedure-related mortality was 0%, and permanent morbidity was 0.4%. Transient morbidity was 9.6%. Histological diagnosis was possible in 99.2% (low-grade gliomas 16.2%, high-grade gliomas 40.3%, other tumors in 27.8%, no neoplastic lesions 14.5%, no definitive histological diagnosis 0.8%). Only the pons location correlated significantly with transient morbidity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In experienced centers, frame-based stereotactic biopsy is a safe diagnostic tool with a high diagnostic yield also for deep-seated and midline lesions.

Stereotactic biopsy in elderly patients: risk assessment and impact on treatment decision.

To evaluate risk profile, diagnostic yield and impact on treatment decision of stereotactic biopsy (SB) in elderly patients with unclear cerebral lesions. In this single center retrospective analysis we identified all patients aged ≥70 years receiving SB between January 2005 and December 2015. Demographic data, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), histology, comorbidity (by CHA2DS2-VASc Score) and use of anticoagulation were retrieved. We scrutinized diagnostic yield, procedural complications (mortality, transient and permanent morbidity), hospitalization time and therapeutic consequence. For correlation analysis Chi-Square, Mann-Whitney rank sum test and binary regression were used. Two hundred and thirty patients were included. In 229 patients SB was technically successful. Median age was 74 (70-87) years, 56.1% of patients were male and median preoperative KPS was 80% (30-100). Median CHA2DS2-VASc Score was 4 (1-9), with 29.6% receiving anticoagulation. Median hospital stay was 8 (2-29) days. Pathological diagnosis was conclusive in 97% revealing neoplastic lesions in 91.7% (high-grade glioma 62.6%, lymphoma 18.3%, metastasis 4.8%, low-grade glioma 3.0% and other tumors 3.0%) and non-neoplastic lesions in 5.3% of cases. Procedure-related mortality was 0.4%, transient and permanent morbidity occurred in 19 patients (8.3%) and eight patients (3.5%). Complication rate was not associated with any of the above-mentioned parameters. Adjuvant therapy was initiated in 171 (74.3%) patients. Decision against disease-specific therapy was only influenced by preoperative KPS (p < 0.001). SB in elderly patients is characterized by a favorable risk profile and high diagnostic yield, allowing tissue based therapeutic consequences even in patients with high comorbidity and anticoagulant medication.

Interdisciplinary Treatment of Intracranial Infectious Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial infectious aneurysms (IIAs) are a rare clinical entity without a definitive treatment guideline. In this study, we evaluate the treatment options of these lesions based on our own clinical experience and review the current knowledge of therapy as portrayed in the literature. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients with an IIA and performed a systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE database. We undertook a comprehensive literature search using the OVID gateway of the MEDLINE database (1950-October 2015) using the following keywords (in combination): 'infectious', 'mycotic', 'cerebral aneurysm', 'intracranial aneurysm'. 1,721 potentially relevant abstracts were identified and 63 studies were selected for full review. The studies were analysed regarding ruptured versus unruptured aneurysms, aneurysm localization and treatment, as well as clinical and radiological outcome. RESULTS: Our institutional series consisted of 6 patients (median age 57 [32-76]) treated between 2011 and 2015. All patients presented with ruptured IIAs located on the middle cerebral artery (MCA, 5 patients) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA, 1 patient). Five patients were treated by clipping and resecting the aneurysm, 1 patient underwent coiling. All patients received antibiotic therapy and 1 patient died. We further identified 814 patients (median age 35.5 [0-81]) in 63 studies. Locations of the aneurysms were mentioned in 55 studies. The most frequent locations of the aneurysms were: MCA (63.5%), posterior cerebral artery (14%), ACA (9.0%) and others (13.5%). Treatment for IIAs was described in 62 studies: antibiotic treatment (56.1%), a combination of antibiotics and surgery (20.9%) or antibiotics and endovascular treatment (23.0%). Outcome was mentioned in 82.4% of the patients with a mortality rate of 16.8%. An evaluation of treatment outcome was limited due to the heterogeneity of patients in the published case series. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic therapy of patients with IIA is mandatory. However, due to the complexity of the disease and its accompanying comorbidities, a general treatment algorithm could not be defined. Analogous to non-mycotic aneurysms, further treatment decisions require an interdisciplinary approach involving neurosurgeons, interventionists and infectious disease specialists.