Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model of Oral Fludrocortisone and Intravenous Hydrocortisone in Healthy Volunteers.

This study aimed at describing the pharmacokinetics and the concentration-effect relationships of fludrocortisone and hydrocortisone on urinary sodium/potassium excretion in healthy volunteers. This was a placebo-controlled, randomized, double blind, crossover study, of oral fludrocortisone and intravenous hydrocortisone, given alone or in combination, in 12 healthy male volunteers. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships on urinary sodium/potassium ratio for each drug. A one-compartment model was used to describe fludrocortisone and hydrocortisone pharmacokinetics. Mean plasma half-life was 1.40 h (95%CI [0.80;2.10]) for fludrocortisone and 2.10 h (95%CI [1.78;2.40]) for hydrocortisone. Clearance was 40.8 L/h (95%CI [33.6;48]) for fludrocortisone and 30 L/h (95%CI [25.3;34.7]) for hydrocortisone. An indirect response model was used to describe effects on urinary sodium/potassium ratio. Fludrocortisone plasma concentrations showed a wider inter-individual dispersion than hydrocortisone plasma concentrations. Urinary sodium/potassium ratio variability was also higher with fludrocortisone as compared to hydrocortisone. The plasma concentration of drug producing 50% of maximal inhibition of urinary sodium/potassium (IC50) was about 200 times lower for fludrocortisone (0.08 µg/L, 95%CI [0.035;0.125]) than for hydrocortisone (16.7 µg/L, 95%CI [10.5;22.9]). Simulations showed that a 4-time per day administration regimen allow to achieve steady fludrocortisone plasma concentrations with stable decrease in urinary sodium/potassium ratio after the second administration of fludrocortisone. Fludrocortisone and hydrocortisone have short and similar plasma elimination half-lives in healthy subjects. Fludrocortisone plasma concentrations and effect on urinary sodium/potassium ratio had a higher inter-individual variability as compared to hydrocortisone. The administration regimen of fludrocortisone should be reconsidered.

Pharmacokinetics of oral fludrocortisone in septic shock.

AIM: The combination of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone improved outcomes in septic shock. However, the specific role of fludrocortisone remains controversial and its pharmacokinetics (PK) has never been investigated in septic shock. This study aimed at characterizing the PK of fludrocortisone in septic shock. METHODS: This was a single-centre ancillary PK study of a large multinational trial of crystalloids versus colloids for acute hypovolemia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In 21 adults with septic shock, fludrocortisone plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry tandem analysis, before and repeatedly until 18 h after an oral dose of 50 µg. PK parameters were estimated using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. RESULTS: Undetectable plasma concentrations were observed in 7 out of 21 patients. In the remaining 14 patients, plasma fludrocortisone concentrations were best described by a one-compartmental model with first-order absorption, a lag time (Tlag ) before the absorption phase, and first-order elimination. Severity of illness, as quantified by Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, significantly increased Tlag and apparent clearance. There was a large inter-individual variability in PK parameters. The population estimates of PK parameters (inter-individual variability) were: Tlag 0.65 h (98%), apparent clearance 40 l h-1 (49%) and apparent volume of distribution 78 l (75%). Plasma half-life was estimated at 1.35 h (95% CI, 0.84-2.03) and area under the curve of plasma concentrations was estimated at 1.25 µg h l-1 (95% CI, 1.09-1.46). CONCLUSIONS: A single oral dose of fludrocortisone yielded undetectable plasma concentrations in one-third of adults with septic shock. Fludrocortisone PK showed a short plasma elimination half-life and a large inter-individual variability.