Clinical outcomes of hemiarthroplasty and biological resurfacing in patients aged younger than 50 years.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty as a treatment for glenohumeral degenerative joint disease is well accepted but has been less predictable with regard to outcomes and durability in a younger aged population, typically aged younger than 50 years. This younger population has a greater potential for glenoid component loosening. This has led surgeons to perform hemiarthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty with biological resurfacing of the glenoid in an effort to avoid the potential problems with a polyethylene glenoid and obtain durable and acceptable results for these patients. METHODS: The study included 44 patients, with 23 undergoing hemiarthroplasty alone and 21 undergoing hemiarthroplasty with biological resurfacing of the glenoid. All patients were aged younger than 50 years. Preoperative diagnoses, comorbidities, demographics, and range of motion were collected. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were obtained. Preoperative and postoperative objective scoring measures (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale, Simple Shoulder Test, Constant-Murley) were used. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 3.8 years for the hemiarthroplasty group and 3.6 years for the biological resurfacing group. Six patients in the hemiarthroplasty and 12 patients in the biological resurfacing group were considered failures due to revision surgery or an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score <50. The hemiarthroplasty group had significantly better visual analog scale and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant failure rate in the hemiarthroplasty and the biologic resurfacing groups compared with results in the literature. Improved outcomes and lower failure rates were observed in the hemiarthroplasty group compared with the biological resurfacing group in this study.

Compound A concentrations during sevoflurane anesthesia in children.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane is a new inhalation agent that should be useful for pediatric anesthesia. Sevoflurane undergoes degradation in the presence of carbon dioxide absorbents; however, quantification of the major degradation product (compound A) has not been evaluated during pediatric anesthesia. This study evaluates sevoflurane degradation compound concentrations during sevoflurane anesthesia using a 2-1 fresh gas flow and a circle system with carbon dioxide absorber in children with normal renal and hepatic function. METHODS: The concentrations of compound A were evaluated during sevoflurane anesthesia in children using fresh soda lime as the carbon dioxide absorbent. Nineteen patients aged 3 months-7 yr were anesthetized with sevoflurane (2.8% mean end-tidal concentration) using a total fresh gas flow of 21 in a circle absorption system. Inspiratory and expiratory limb circuit gas samples were obtained at hourly intervals, and the samples were analyzed using a gas chromatography-flame ionization detection technique. Carbon dioxide absorbent temperatures were measured in the soda lime during anesthesia for hepatic and renal function studies. Venous blood samples were obtained before anesthesia, at the end of anesthesia, and 2h after anesthesia for plasma inorganic fluoride ion concentration. RESULTS: The maximum inspiratory concentration of compound A was 5.4 +/- 4.4 ppm (mean +/- SD), and the corresponding expiratory concentration was 3.7 +/- 2.7 ppm (mean +/- SD). The maximum inspiratory compound A concentration in any patient was 15 ppm. Mean concentrations of compound A peaked at intubation and remained stable, declining slightly after 120 min of anesthesia. The duration of anesthesia was 240 +/- 139 min (mean +/-SD). Maximum soda lime temperature ranged between 23.1 degrees C and 40.9 degrees C. There was a positive correlation between maximum absorbent temperature and maximum compound A concentration (r2 = 0.58), as well as between the child's body surface area and maximum compound A concentration (r2 = 0.59). Peak plasma inorganic fluoride ion concentration was 21.5 +/- 6.1 microgmol/1. There were no clinically significant changes in hepatic or renal function studies performed 24 h postanesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane anesthesia of 4 h in normal children using a 2-1 flow circle system produced concentrations of compound A of 15 ppm or less. There was no evidence of abnormality of renal or hepatic function up to 24 h after anesthesia; however, larger studies will be required to confirm the absence of organ toxicity.

Cardiovascular effects of sevoflurane compared with those of isoflurane in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane is a new inhalational anesthetic with desirable clinical properties. In some clinical situations, an understanding of the detailed cardiovascular properties of an anesthetic is important, so the authors evaluated the hemodynamic effects of sevoflurane in healthy volunteers not undergoing surgery. METHODS: Twenty-one subjects were randomized to receive sevoflurane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane: 60% N2O. Anesthesia was induced and maintained by inhalation of the designated anesthetic. Hemodynamic measurements were performed before anesthesia, during controlled ventilation, during spontaneous ventilation, and again during controlled ventilation after 5.5 h of anesthesia. RESULTS: A few subjects became excessively hypotensive at high anesthetic concentrations (2.0 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC] sevoflurane, 1.5 and 2.0 MAC isoflurane), preventing data collection. Sevoflurane did not alter heart rate, but decreased mean arterial pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure. Cardiac index decreased at 1.0 and 1.5 MAC, but in subjects with mean arterial pressure > or = 50 mmHg returned to baseline values at 2.0 MAC when systemic vascular resistance decreased. Sevoflurane did not alter echocardiographic indices of ventricular function, but did decrease an index of afterload. Sevoflurane caused a greater decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure than did isoflurane, but the cardiovascular effects were otherwise similar. Administration of sevoflurane with 60% N2O, prolonged administration or spontaneous ventilation resulted in diminished cardiovascular depression. CONCLUSIONS: At 1.0 and 1.5 MAC, sevoflurane was well tolerated by healthy volunteers. At 2.0 MAC, in subjects with mean arterial pressure > or = 50 mmHg, no adverse cardiovascular properties were noted. Similar to other contemporary anesthetics, sevoflurane caused evidence of myocardial depression. Hemodynamic instability was noted in some subjects at high anesthetic concentrations in the absence of surgical stimulation. The incidence was similar to that with isoflurane. The cardiovascular effects of sevoflurane were similar to those of isoflurane, an anesthetic commonly used in clinical practice since 1981.