A phase III, 52-week, open-label study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 5% sofpironium bromide (BBI-4000) gel in Japanese patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis.

A long-term study was conducted in Japanese patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis who completed the preceding 6-week phase III, confirmatory study of 5% sofpironium bromide gel (hereinafter referred to as sofpironium) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 52-week treatment with sofpironium. In the long-term study, 185 patients who completed the confirmatory study (94 and 91 patients in the vehicle and sofpironium groups, respectively) started to receive sofpironium (switching and extension groups, respectively), and all these patients were included in both the full analysis set (FAS) and the safety analysis set (SAF). In the FAS, there were more females than males (73.0% vs. 27.0%), and median age was 38.0 years. A total of 161 patients (86 and 75 patients in the switching and extension groups, respectively) completed the study at week 52. The proportions of patients with hyperhidrosis disease severity score of 1 or 2 and a 50% or more reduction in total gravimetric weight of sweat were 57.4% in the switching group and 58.2% in the extension group at week 52. The proportions of patients who achieved this efficacy end-point in the long-term study were similar to that (53.9%) in the sofpironium group in the confirmatory study. In the SAF, the incidences of adverse events (AEs) were 80.9% in the switching group and 83.5% in the extension group, and the incidences of adverse drug reactions were 39.4% and 45.1%, respectively. AEs that occurred in at least 20% of patients in both treatment groups were application site dermatitis (25.5% and 33.0%, respectively) and nasopharyngitis (31.9% and 23.1%, respectively). Reported AEs were generally mild, and there were no deaths. Serious AEs occurred in three patients, but none were considered related to the study drug. In this study, the efficacy of sofpironium was maintained during 52-week treatment, and no new safety risk was observed.

A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study of 5% sofpironium bromide (BBI-4000) gel in Japanese patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis.

A phase 3 study was conducted to verify the efficacy and safety of 5% sofpironium bromide (BBI-4000) gel (hereinafter referred to as sofpironium) administrated for 6 weeks in Japanese patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis. The primary efficacy end-point was the proportion of patients who satisfied both criteria of a Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Score (HDSS) of 1 or 2 at the end of 6-week treatment and a 50% or more reduction in total gravimetric weight of sweat at the end of treatment relative to baseline. A total of 281 patients were randomized to receive 5% sofpironium (141 patients) or vehicle (140 patients), and all patients were included in the full analysis set (FAS). In the FAS, 70.1% of patients were female, and the median age was 35.0 years. The proportion of patients who achieved the primary efficacy end-point was 53.9% in the sofpironium group and 36.4% in the vehicle group, with a statistically significant difference of 17.5% (95% confidence interval, 6.02-28.93) between these two groups (P = 0.003). The incidence of adverse events was 44.0% in the sofpironium group and 30.7% in the vehicle group, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions was 16.3% in the sofpironium group and 5.0% in the vehicle group. Reported adverse events were generally mild or moderate in severity. In the sofpironium group, common events (incidence, ≥5%) were nasopharyngitis (14.2%) and dermatitis/erythema at the application site (8.5%/5.7%), with no serious adverse events reported. This study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of 5% sofpironium.

Infliximab-Induced Aseptic Meningitis during the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.

A 42-year-old Japanese man presented with persistent headache during treatment for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with infliximab. Treatment with infliximab was initiated 3 years before and the psoriatic skin lesions with arthritis were well controlled. However, after 21 doses of infliximab, the skin lesions and joint pain exacerbated and became intractable. Ten days after the dosage of infliximab was increased, the patient experienced headache and nausea with high fever. He had scaly, well-circumscribed erythemas on his trunk, extremities, and deformed nails. He also had swelling and pain in multiple joints. His complete blood and differential leukocyte counts were normal. The level of C-reactive protein was 16.66 mg/dL, whereas anti-infliximab antibodies were absent. Nuchal rigidity was absent and there were no abnormal neurological findings; however, jolt test results were positive. Results from magnetic resonance imaging were normal, whereas those from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination were almost normal. The CSF contained mononuclear cells and was negative for bacteriological cultures, India ink staining, and polymerase chain reaction amplification of herpesvirus group DNA. Headache and nausea improved 2 months after infliximab was discontinued. The patient failed to respond to infliximab treatment for PsA, and we diagnosed infliximab-induced aseptic meningitis. Infliximab was discontinued and treatment with ustekinumab and methotrexate was initiated. Thereafter, the psoriatic skin lesion and joint pain gradually improved. Infliximab-induced aseptic meningitis may be a differential diagnosis when symptoms of meningitis develop during infliximab administration.

Novel interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunoSpot assay using activated cells for identifying hypersensitivity-inducing drug culprits.

BACKGROUND: The drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST), also referred to as lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), is used to identify the culprit drug in cases of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADR). Although DLST is a widely used in vitro test, its sensitivity and specificity are unsatisfactory. Recent reports suggest that the detection of drug-induced interferon (IFN)-γ production using enzyme-linked immunoSpot (ELISpot) assay (conventional IFN-γ ELISpot) is useful for identifying culprit drugs in cADR cases. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish a novel method for identifying culprit drugs in patients with cADR by efficiently detecting drug-specific IFN-γ production using activated cells. METHODS: Sixteen patients with cADR, including drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, erythema multiforme-like eruption, maculopapular exanthema, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis, caused by clinically convincing culprit drugs were enrolled in this study. In some cases, the blood samples were obtained at two or three different time points. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from total 20 samples were analyzed using both the DLST and drug-induced conventional IFN-γ ELISpot. In addition, drug-induced IFN-γ ELISpot was performed using PBMCs, which were stimulated with anti-cluster of differentiation (CD)-3/CD28 antibody-coated microbeads and interleukin (IL)-2 for 7 days before exposure to the culprit drugs (modified IFN-γ ELISpot). RESULTS: Among the culprit drugs tested in each patient, the modified IFN-γ ELISpot was positive in 17 samples (13 patients) while DLST and conventional IFN-γ ELISpot were positive in eight and four samples (six and three patients), respectively. CONCLUSION: The modified IFN-γ ELISpot using activated PBMCs was more sensitive than the conventional IFN-γ ELISpot was for detecting drug-induced IFN-γ production, which could be a useful in vitro tool for identifying culprit drugs in cADR cases.