Predictors of developing renal dysfunction following diagnosis of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA), renal dysfunction is a poor prognostic indicator. Limited data are available on variables that portend worsening renal function (wRF) among ATTR-CA patients. OBJECTIVES: This study assesses which characteristics place patients at higher risk for the development of wRF (defined as a drop of ≥10% in glomerular filtration rate [GFR]) within the first year following diagnosis of ATTR-CA. METHODS: We included patients with ATTR-CA (n = 134) evaluated between 2/2016 and 12/2022 and followed for up to 1 year at our amyloid clinic. Patients were stratified into two groups: a group with maintained renal function (mRF) and a group with wRF and compared using appropriate testing. Significant variables in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariable logistic regression model to determine characteristics associated with wRF. RESULTS: Within a follow-up period of 326 ± 118 days, the median GFR% change measured -6% [-18%, +8]. About 41.8% (n = 56) had wRF, while the remainder had mRF. In addition, in patients with no prior history of chronic kidney disease (CKD), 25.5% developed de novo CKD. On multivariable logistic regression, only New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥III (odds ratio [OR]: 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.6-9.3]), history of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: [0.1-0.7]), and not receiving SGLT-2i (OR: 0.1, 95% CI: [0.02-0.5]) were significant predictors of wRF. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the development of de novo renal dysfunction or wRF is common following the diagnosis of ATTR-CA. Additionally, we identified worse NYHA class and no prior history of IHD as significant predictors associated with developing wRF, while receiving SGLT-2i therapy appeared to be protective in this population.

Liver transplantation amidst the COVID-19 era: Our center's experience.

Coronavirus disease 2019 significantly impacted the liver transplant process worldwide. Consequently, it brought significant challenges and limitations to transplant policies and organ allocation forcing liver transplant centers to adjust their protocols to ensure maximum benefit and avoid harm to their patients. Our center, like many others, was obliged to adapt to the challenges. This paper provided an overview of the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 on liver transplantations and detailed our center's experience and efforts during this unprecedented pandemic to serve as a guide for future public health crises.

Use of longitudinal rigid sternal fixation in prevention and treatment of wound complications among high-risk patients after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, wire cerclage closure has been used to reapproximate the sternum after cardiac surgery. Recent evidence suggests that rigid sternal fixation may reduce the risk of wound complications. The aim of this study was to analyze our 10-year experience with longitudinal rigid sternal fixation (LRSF) for prevention and treatment of wound complications in high-risk patients. METHODS: We reviewed data from cardiac surgical database of patients who underwent LRSF, and compared their outcomes with conventional wire cerclage closure (CWS). Among these 319 patients were designated as having high-risk for the development of deep wound complications and received primary LRSF (treatment group). We matched their outcomes with 319 patients who met indications for LRSF however, underwent standard closure with CWC (control group). RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding preoperative and intraoperative variables. The benefit observed among matched patients who had undergone LRSF was largely driven by a decreased rate of deep wound infections (0.63% vs. 3.45% vs., p < .01), 30-day mortality (1.57% vs. 5.96%) and hospital length (8.2 vs. 11.7 days) p < .05, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression analysis found four independent risk factors for the development of sternal dehiscence. Sternal healing evaluated by computerized tomography scan using 6-point scale at 3 months after surgery was superior in LRSF patients. Pain scores were significantly lower in LRSF patients as well. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an increased risk for sternal instability and wound infections after cardiac surgery, sternal reconstruction using LRSF is an effective technique to stabilize sternum for preventive and treatment purposes.