Prospective assessment of key factors influencing treatment strategy and outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP).

BACKGROUND: Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are a clinical entity with an increasing significance in clinical practice. Little is known about the conditions, which influence decision making and outcome. SETTING: Level I trauma center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective assessment of selected parameters of patients, who were admitted with a FFP in a 2-year period. Fractures were classified in accordance with the Rommens and Hofmann classification. Living environment, level of autonomy (independent walking), type of treatment (conservative versus operative), type of surgical technique, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L), Short Form-8 Physical Component Score (SF-8 PCS) and Short Form-8 Mental Component Score (SF-8 MCS), Barthel Index, Parker Mobility Score (PMS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were collected at primary presentation (t1), at discharge (t2) and after 3 (t3) and 12 months (t4). Length of hospital stay, in-hospital complications, surgery-related complications, new osteoporotic fractures and mortality rate within the first year were also registered. The key factors influencing the choice of therapy and outcome were looked for. RESULTS: 110 patients, 99 women (90%) and 11 men (10%), were included in the study. Their mean age was 79.2 years (SD 10 years). Fourteen patients had FFP type I (12.7%), 59 FFP type II (53.6%), 11 FFP type III (10%) and 26 FFP type IV fractures (23.6%). All patients with FFP type I were treated conservatively. 48 patients with FFP types II-IV were treated conservatively and 48 operatively. Patients, who got a conservative outpatient treatment first and were hospitalized later, had higher FFP fracture types at admission. Operatively treated patients were hospitalized at a median of 33.5 days after the beginning of complaints, whereas the median day of admission of the conservative group was the day of trauma (p < 0.001). The operatively treated patients were hospitalized in a worse clinical condition (SF-8 PCS, EQ-5D-5L, autonomy). Length of stay (LoS) of operatively treated patients was significantly longer than of conservatively treated (p < 0.001). There was a tendency to more in-hospital complications in the operative group (p = 0.059). The rate of surgery-related complications (8.3%) was low with only one revision needed. Selected outcome parameters improved during the observation period nearly reaching the level before FFP after 1 year. SF-8 PCS, Barthel index and rate of patients living home were higher in the operative group at t4. The improvement of autonomy (independent walking) between t1 and t4 was significant in the operated group (p = 0.04) but not in the conservative group (p = 0.96). One-year mortality rate was 11.7% with no difference between the fracture types. One-year mortality rate of conservatively treated patients with FFP type II-IV was 13.5% versus 6.9% in the operative group (p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment is appropriate in patients with FFP type I as well as in patients with FFP type II, provided that the last ones are hospitalized immediately after the traumatic event. Surgical treatment is recommended in patients with higher fracture types, with delayed presentation or after unsuccessful conservative treatment. In the conservative and operative group, all selected parameters considerably improved between t1 and t4 with a steeper increase in the operative group. The rate of postoperative complications is low. The 1-year mortality rate is the lowest in the operative group. Surgical stabilization of FFP is safe and reliable provided it is performed with care and in the appropriate target group.

Artificial intelligence and CT-based 3D statistical modeling to assess transsacral corridors and plan implant positioning.

Transsacral corridors at levels S1 and S2 represent complex osseous spaces allowing percutaneous fixation of non- or minimally-displaced fragility fractures of the sacrum. To safely place transsacral implants, they must be completely intraosseous. However, standard radiographs and CT do not properly demonstrate the corridor's intricate configuration. Our goal was to facilitate the three-dimensional assessment of transsacral corridors using artificial intelligence and the planning of transsacral implant positioning. In total, 100 pelvic CTs (49 women, mean age: 58.6 ± SD 14.8 years; 51 men, mean age: 60.7 ± SD 13 years) were used to compute a 3D statistical model of the pelvic ring. On the basis of morphologic features (=predictors) and principal components scores (=response), regression learners were interactively trained, validated, and tuned to predict/sample personalized 3D pelvic models. They were matched via thin-plate spline transformation to a series of 20 pelvic CTs with fragility fractures of the sacrum (18 women and 2 men, age: 69-9.5 years, mean age: 78.65 ± SD 8.4 years). These models demonstrated the availability, dimension, cross-section, and symmetry of transsacral corridors S1 and S2, as well as the planned implant position, dimension, axes, and entry and exit points. The complete intraosseous pathway was controlled in CT reconstructions. We succeeded to establish a workflow determining transsacral corridors S1 and S2 using artificial intelligence and 3D statistical modeling.

Asymmetry of the pelvic ring evaluated by CT-based 3D statistical modeling.

The human pelvis is a complex anatomical structure that consists of the innominate bones, sacrum and coccyx to form the pelvic ring. Even though considered to be a symmetric entity, asymmetry of the pelvic ring (APR) might occur to alter its anatomy, function, or biomechanics or to impact assessment and treatment of clinical cases. APR and its assessment is complicated by the intricate anatomy of the pelvic ring. There is only limited information and understanding about APR with no established evaluation methods existing. The objective of the present study was to adopt CT-based 3D statistical modeling and analysis to assess APR within the complex anatomy of the pelvic ring. We were interested to establish a better understanding of APR with knowledge and applications transferred to human anatomy, related research, and development subjects and to clinical settings. A series of 150 routine, clinical, pelvic CT protocols of European and Asian males and females (64 ± 15 (20-90) years old) were post-processed to compute gender- and ancestry-specific 3D statistical models of the pelvic ring. Evaluations comprised principal component analysis (PCA) that included size, shape, and asymmetry patterns and their variations to be assessed. Four different CT-based 3D statistical models of the entire pelvic ring were computed according to the gender and ancestry specific groups. PCA mainly displayed size and shape variations. Examination of additional PCA modes permitted six distinct asymmetry patterns to be identified. They were located at the sacrum, iliac crest, pelvic brim, pubic symphysis, inferior pubic ramus, and near to the acetabulum. Accordingly, the pelvic ring demonstrated not to be entirely symmetric. Assessment of its asymmetry proved to be a challenging task. Using CT-based 3D statistical modeling and PCA, we identified six distinct APRs that were located at different anatomical regions. These regions are more prone to APRs than other sites. Minor asymmetry patterns have to be distinguished from the distinct APRs. Side differences with regard to size, shape, and/or position require to be taken into account. APRs may be due different load mechanisms applied via spine or lower extremity or locally. There is a need for simpler and efficient, yet reliable methods to be routinely transferred to human anatomy, related research, and development subjects and to clinical settings.

Medial buttressing of the quadrilateral surface in acetabular and periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

BACKGROUND: In geriatric acetabular fractures, the quadrilateral plate is often involved in the fracture pattern and medially displaced. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) includes reduction of the quadrilateral plate and securing its position. In this study, the concept of medial buttressing in acute and periprosthetic acetabular fractures is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients, who sustained an acetabular fracture between 2012 and 2018, in whom ORIF with a specific implant for medial buttressing was performed, were included in the study. Patients were divided in two groups; acute acetabular fractures (group 1) and periprosthetic acetabular fractures (group 2). Demographics, type of fracture, surgical approach, type of implant for medial buttressing, comorbidities, general and surgical in-hospital complications and length of hospital stay were recorded retrospectively. The following data were collected from the surviving patients by telephone interview: EQ-5D-5L, SF-8 physical and SF-8 mental before trauma and at follow-up, UCLA activity scale, Parker Mobility Score and Numeric Rating Scale. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included in this study, 30 males (65.2%) and 16 females (34.8%). Forty patients were included group 1 and six patients in group 2. The median age of patients of group 1 was 78 years. Among them, 82.5% presented with comorbidities. Their median length of in-hospital stay was 20.5 days. 57.5% of patients suffered from in-hospital complications. The concept of medial buttressing was successful in all but one patient. ORIF together with primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) was carried out as a single stage procedure in 3 patients. Secondary THA was performed in 5 additional patients (5/37 = 13.5%) within the observation period. Among surviving patients, 79.2% were evaluated after 3 years of follow-up. Quality of life, activity level and mobility dropped importantly and were lower than the values of a German reference population. SF-8 mental did not change. The median age of patients of group 2 was 79.5 years, all of them presented with one or several comorbidities. The median length of in-hospital stay was 18.5 days. 50% of patients suffered from in-hospital complications. The concept of medial buttressing was successful in all patients. 5 of 6 patients (83.3%) could be evaluated after a median of 136 weeks. In none of these patients, secondary surgery was necessary. Quality of life, activity level and mobility importantly dropped as well in this group. SF-8 mental remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: In geriatric acetabular fractures with involvement and medial displacement of the quadrilateral plate, medial buttressing as part of ORIF proved to be reliable. Only 13.5% of patients of group 1 needed a secondary THA within 3 years of follow-up, which is lower than in comparable studies. Despite successful surgery, quality of life, activity level and mobility dropped importantly in all patients. The loss of independence did however not influence SF-8 mental values.

Open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures in patients of old age.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: There is an ongoing debate on which treatment for acetabular fractures in elderly patients is the most appropriate. This study was set up to identify the role of open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures in persons of old age. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts and radiological data of all patients older than 65 years, who suffered an isolated acetabular fracture and were admitted in our Department between 2010 and 2014 (5-year period). Complications, outcome and mortality were recorded. Of all surviving patients, quality of life (QoL), mobility and independence were graded with European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L), European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D-VAS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) and Tinetti Mobility Test (TMT). RESULTS: Seventy patients could be identified. There were 52 men (74%) and 18 women (26%) with a median age of 79.0 years (range: 65-104 years). Forty-six patients (66%) had been treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), 24 (34%) conservatively. There were negative predictive factors-subchondral impaction, damage to the femoral head and multiple fragments-in 54% of the operative group. With ORIF, an anatomical reduction could be achieved in 27 patients (59%), an acceptable in 18 (39%) and a poor in one (2%). At follow-up, 18 patients (26%) had died and 23 (33%) were not able to participate. The follow-up rate of the surviving operatively treated patients was 77%. Eleven of 46 operated patients (24%) needed a conversion to a total hip arthroplasty (THA). All patients undergoing conversion had imperfect reduction after surgery. No patient in the non-operative group underwent conversion to THA during follow-up. The median follow-up time of operatively treated patients without conversion (n = 17) was 30 months (range, 16-73 months), of patients with THA (n = 9) 30 months after conversion (range, 17-55 months). Quality of reduction correlated to QoL, mobility and independence in all recorded parameters. Patients with secondary THA had similar good outcomes as patients after ORIF without later conversion. Men had better outcome than women. CONCLUSION: ORIF of acetabular fractures in patients of old age results in excellent outcomes at short-term follow-up when anatomical reduction can be achieved. In case of negative predictive factors, ORIF cannot be regarded as a definitive solution, rather as the construction of a stable socket for secondary THA. The decision of therapy should be made dependent on pre-operative radiographic parameters.

[Fragility fractures of the pelvis]. / Fragilitätsfrakturen des Beckens.

Fragility fractures of the pelvis are increasing in frequency. In most cases patients suffer a minor injury, have intense pain in the pelvic region and impaired mobility. The new fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) classification distinguishes between four types with increasing instability. The FFP types I and II are treated conservatively. For FFP types III and IV and type II with unsuccessful conservative treatment, minimally invasive stabilizing techniques are recommended. Both the posterior and anterior pelvic ring must be stabilized. Alternative techniques for dorsal stabilization are iliosacral screw and transsacral bar osteosynthesis, transiliac internal fixator and lumbopelvic fixation. External fixation, retrograde transpubic screw fixation, anterior internal fixation and plate and screw osteosynthesis are alternatives for the anterior pelvic ring. Treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis should be carried out as part of an orthogeriatric co-management.