Surgical Drainage of Large Macular Cystoid Spaces in Coats Disease.

Purpose: To describe an option of surgically draining large macular cystoid spaces in a patient with Coats disease. Methods: A case and its findings were analyzed. Results: A standard pars plana vitrectomy was performed to aspirate large macular cystoid spaces using a subretinal cannula with intraoperative optical coherence tomography guidance. Because of the viscous nature of the chronic fluid and lipid exudates, the contents of the large cystoid spaces were drained through a retinotomy using a soft-tipped aspiration cannula. Postoperative follow-up after surgical drainage showed immediate resolution of the macular cystoid spaces and gradual resolution of the dense subfoveal exudates over 1 year. Although surgical intervention led to the eventual resolution of the macular edema and exudates, visual recovery was limited by the chronicity of the condition. Conclusions: Surgical drainage of large macular cystoid spaces in Coats disease can be achieved in eyes that are refractory to medical management. Earlier surgical intervention in select cases may allow for visual rehabilitation.

Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Retinal Disorders.

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are key mediator of retinal and choroidal neovascularization as well as retinal vascular leakage leading to macular edema. As such, VEGF plays an important role in mediating visually significant complications associated with common retinal disorders such as diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, and age-related macular degeneration. Various drugs that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF therapies) have been developed to minimize vision loss associated with these disorders. These drugs are injected into the vitreous cavity in a clinic setting at regular intervals. This article provides an overview of the various anti-VEGF drugs used in ophthalmology and the common retinal conditions that benefit from this therapy.

Fungal Endophthalmitis Masquerading as Sympathetic Ophthalmia.

PURPOSE: To describe the ocular pathology of a patient with fungal endophthalmitis with features mimicking sympathetic ophthalmia. METHODS: Review of medical records and histopathology of a single patient. RESULTS: A 72-year-old male who sustained penetrating injury to the left eye with an agave plant presented to our clinic 16 months after the initial injury. Prior to presentation, the patient had developed endophthalmitis and had undergone anterior chamber washout, vitrectomy, and intravitreal steroids, antibiotics, antifungals, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. At presentation, the patient had a blind, painful eye and subsequently underwent enucleation. Histopathology demonstrated granulomatous inflammation with multinucleated giant cells in the iris and Dalen Fuchs nodules with CD68 positive epithelioid histiocytes associated with the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) sparing the choriocapillaris. These findings were initially attributed to sympathetic ophthalmia. The fellow eye did not have any signs of inflammation, and additional fungal PAS stains were positive for filamentous fungal elements, leading to a diagnosis of fungal endophthalmitis. CONCLUSIONS: Fungal endophthalmitis may develop histopathologic features that are similar to those seen in sympathetic ophthalmia. Recognition of the overlap between the histopathologic features of these diseases may reduce the possibility of misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment of the fellow eye.

Predictive Factors of Research Productivity among Ophthalmology Residents: A Benchmark Analysis.

Introduction Positive and negative associations between prior publications and future research productivity is described in other fields, but no such analysis exists for ophthalmology. We conducted a study to determine characteristics of residents exhibiting research productivity during residency. Methods Using San Francisco Match and Program Web sites, a roster of ophthalmology residents in 2019 to 2020 was compiled, and publication data was collected via PubMed and Google Scholar on a random sample of 100 third-year residents. Results The median number of publications generated by ophthalmology residents before residency is 2 (range 0-13). Thirty-seven, 23, and 40 residents had zero, one, and two or more papers published during residency, respectively, with a median of 1 (range 0-14). On univariate analysis, compared with residents who published zero or one paper, those who published ≥ 2 were more likely to have more preresidency publications (odds ratio [OR] 1.30; p = 0.005), attend a top-25 ranked residency program by multiple metrics including Doximity reputation (OR 4.92; p < 0.001), and have attended a top-25 ranked medical school program by U.S. News and World Report (OR 3.24; p = 0.03). However, on adjusted analyses, the only factor that remained significant for predicting publications in residency was whether the residency program attended was top 25 ranked (OR 3.54; p = 0.009). Discussion/Conclusion With the advent of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 pass/fail system, greater emphasis will be placed on other metrics, including research. This is the first benchmark analysis examining factors predictive of publication productivity in ophthalmology residents. Our study suggests that the residency program attended, not the medical school attended or prior publication history, plays an influential role in the number of publications produced during residency, highlighting the importance of factors to support research on the institutional level, such as mentorship and funding, rather than historical factors in research productivity by the resident.

Retinal defocus and form-deprivation induced regional differential gene expression of bone morphogenetic proteins in chick retinal pigment epithelium.

We previously reported bidirectional gene expression regulation of the Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP2, 4, and 7) in chick retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in response to imposed optical defocus and form-deprivation (FD). This study investigated whether there are local (regional) differences in these effects. 19-day old White-Leghorn chicks wore monocular +10 or - 10 D lenses, or diffusers (FD) for 2 or 48 hr, after which RPE samples were collected from both eyes, from a central circular zone (3 mm radius), and 3 mm wide annular mid-peripheral and peripheral zones in all cases. BMP2, 4, and 7 gene expression levels in RPE from treated and fellow control eyes were compared as well as differences across zones. With the +10 D lens, increased expression of both BMP2 and BMP4 genes was observed in central and mid-peripheral zones but not the peripheral zone after 2 and 48 hr. In contrast, with the -10 D lens BMP2 gene expression was significantly decreased in all three zones after 2 and 48 hr. Similar patterns of BMP2 gene expression were observed in all three zones after 48 hr of FD. Smaller changes were recorded for BMP4 and BMP7 gene expression for both myopia-inducing treatments. That optical defocus- and FD-induced changes in BMP gene expression in chick RPE show treatment-dependent local (regional) differences suggest important differences in the nature and contributions of local retinal and underlying RPE regions to eye growth regulation.

Differential gene expression of BMP2 and BMP receptors in chick retina & choroid induced by imposed optical defocus.

Recent studies have demonstrated the defocus sign-dependent, bidirectional gene expression regulation of bone morphogenetic proteins, BMP2, 4 and 7 in chick RPE. In this study, we examined the effects of imposed positive (+10 D) and negative (-10 D) lenses on the gene expression of these BMPs and BMP receptors (BMPR1A, BMPR1B, BMPR2) in chick retina and choroid after monocular lens treatment for 2 or 48 h, as indicators of the roles of retinal and choroidal BMPs and receptors in postnatal eye growth regulation. In retina, although all genes were expressed, neither +10 nor -10 D lenses, worn for either 2 or 48 h, significantly altered gene expression. In contrast, treatment-related differential gene expression was detected in the choroid for both BMPs and their receptors, although interestingly, with the +10 D lens, BMP2 was up-regulated by 156.7 ± 19.7% after 2 h, while BMPR1A was down-regulated to 82.3 ± 12.5% only after 48 h. With the -10 D lens, only the gene expression of BMPR1B was significantly altered, being up-regulated by 162.3 ± 21.2% after 48 h. Untreated birds showed no difference in expression between their two eyes, for any of the genes examined. The finding that retinal gene expression for BMP2, 4, 7 and their receptors are not affected by short-term optical defocus contrasts with previous observations of sign-dependent expression changes for the same genes in the RPE. The latter changes were also larger and more consistent in direction than the choroidal gene expression changes reported here. The interrelationship between these various changes and their biological significance for eye growth regulation are yet to be elucidated.