Analysis of DUX4 Expression in Bone Marrow and Re-Discussion of DUX4 Function in the Health and Disease.

OBJECTIVE: DUX4 is an embryonic transcription factor (TF) later silenced in somatic tissues, while active in germline testis cells. Re-expression in somatic cells has been revealed to be present in pathologic conditions such as dystrophy, leukemia, and other cancer types. Embryonic cells, cancer cells and testis cells that show DUX4 expression are pluri-multipotent cells. This lead us to question "Could DUX4 be a TF that is active in certain types of potent somatic cells?" As a perfect reflection of the potent cell pool, we aimed to reveal DUX4 expression in the bone marrow. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Bone marrow aspiration materials of seven healthy donors aged between 3 and 32 (2 males/5 females) were investigated with qPCR analysis after RNA isolation for the presence of DUX4 full length mRNA expression. Samples have been investigated for protein existence of DUX4 via immunohistochemistry in two donors that had sufficient aspiration material. RESULTS: DUX4 mRNA expression was present in all donors, with higher expression compared to B-actin. DUX4 positive stained cells were also detected by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION: With these results, novel expression for DUX4 in hematopoietic tissue is described. Further studies on the function of DUX4 in hematopoietic cells can shed light on DUX4-related pathways, and contribute to the treatment of DUX4-related diseases such as B-ALL, other cancers, and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

Promising Perspective to Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Treatment: Nutraceuticals and Phytochemicals.

Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) is in the top three list of all dystrophies with an approximate 1:8000 incidence. It is not a life-threatening disease; however, the progression of the disease extends over being wheelchair bound. Despite some drug trials continuing, including DUX4 inhibition, TGF-ß inhibition and resokine which promote healthier muscle, there is not an applicable treatment option for FSHD today. Still, there is a need for new agents to heal, stop or at least slow down muscle wasting. Current FSHD studies involving nutraceuticals as vitamin C, vitamin E, coenzyme Q10, zinc, selenium, and phytochemicals as curcumin or genistein, daidzein flavonoids provide promising treatment strategies. In this review, we present the clinical and molecular nature of FSHD and focus on nutraceuticals and phytochemicals that may alleviate FSHD. In the light of the association of impaired pathophysiological FSHD pathways with nutraceuticals and phytochemicals according to the literature, we present both studied and novel approaches that can contribute to FSHD treatment.

Conventional Cytogenetics and Interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results in Multiple Myeloma: A Turkey Laboratory Analysis of 381 Cases.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an uncontrolled proliferation of plasma cells and these cells play an important role in the immune system. In this research, we retrospectively analyzed cytogenetic abnormalities in 381 patients with MM. Conventional cytogenetic analysis was successful in 354 patients (92.9%). Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 31.9% (113/354) and 45.8% (116/253) of patients screened with conventional cytogenetics and FISH, respectively. Of 113 patients with chromosomal abnormalities, 31 patients (27.4%) had hyperdiploid and 26 of 31 patients with hyperdiploidy had both numerical and structural anomalies. On the other hand, non-hyperdiploidy was observed in 62 patients (54.8%). The most common gains of chromosomes were 15, 9, 19 followed by 3, 5, 11, and 21. Whole chromosome losses were also frequent involving Y, 13 and 22 chromosomes. In our patients, 1q gain was determined in a total of 25 patients (22%), including 7 structural abnormalities and 19 unbalanced translocations causing complete or partial duplication of the long arm of chromosome 1. Although the breakpoints were different, t(1;5) balanced translocation and unbalanced translocations of t(1;2), t(1;3), t(1;7), t(1;16) and t(1;19) were observed twice. The most common structural abnormality was the deletion of the short arm of chromosome 13 (13q) or monosomy of chromosome 13 (-13) (24.1%, 61/253) in patients evaluated by FISH. Deletion involving chromosome 17p (del 17p) or monosomy of chromosome 17 (-17) were found in 31 (12.3%) patients. Translocations involving IgH regions were as follows: t(11;14)(q13;q32.33) in 22 (8.7%), t(4;14)(p16.3;q32.33) in 22 (8.7%) and t(14;16)(q32.33;q23.1) in 2 (0.8%) patients. In addition, t(14;17)(q32;q21) translocation was detected in a multiple myeloma patient for the first time in this study. There are a limited number of large study groups including both cytogenetic and FISH findings in MM patients. As the number of these studies increases, it is thought that new cytogenetic data can be guiding especially in clinical risk determination.