Assessment of the performance of the plasma separation card for HIV-1 viral load monitoring in South Africa.

Scaling up of newer innovations that address the limitations of the dried blood spot and the logistics of plasma monitoring is needed. We employed a multi-site, cross-sectional assessment of the plasma separation card (PSC) on blood specimens collected from all consenting adults, assenting young and pediatric patients living with HIV from 10 primary healthcare clinics in South Africa. Venous blood for EDTA-plasma samples was collected and analyzed according to the standard of care assay, while collected capillary blood for the PSC samples was analyzed using the Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM) HIV-1 Test at the National Reference laboratories. McNemar tests assessed the differences in concordance between the centrifuged plasma and dried plasma spots. The usability of PSC by blood spotting, PSC preparation, and pre-analytical work was assessed by collecting seven-point Likert-scale data from healthcare and laboratory workers. We enrolled 538 patients, mostly adults [n = 515, 95.7% (95% CI: 93.7%-97.1%)] and females [n = 322, 64.2% (95% CI: 60.0%-68.1%)]. Overall, 536 paired samples were collected using both PSC- and EDTA-plasma diagnostics, and 502 paired PSC- and EDTA-plasma samples assessed. Concordance between the paired samples was obtained for 446 samples. Analysis of these 446 paired samples at 1,000 copies per milliliter threshold yielded an overall sensitivity of 87.5% [95% CI: 73.2%-95.8%] and specificity of 99.3% [95% CI: 97.9%-99.8%]. Laboratory staff reported technical difficulties in most tasks. The usability of the PSC by healthcare workers was favorable. For policymakers to consider PSC scale-up for viral load monitoring, technical challenges around using PSC at the clinic and laboratory level need to be addressed. IMPORTANCE: Findings from this manuscript emphasize the reliability of the plasma separation card (PSC), a novel diagnostic method that can be implemented in healthcare facilities in resource-constrained settings. The agreement of the PSC with the standard of care EDTA plasma for viral load monitoring is high. Since the findings showed that these tests were highly specific, we recommend a scale-up of PSC in South Africa for diagnosis of treatment failure.

HIV Viral Load Testing in the South African Public Health Setting in the Context of Evolving ART Guidelines and Advances in Technology, 2013-2022.

HIV viral load (VL) testing plays a key role in the clinical management of HIV as a marker of adherence and antiretroviral efficacy. To date, national and international antiretroviral treatment recommendations have evolved to endorse routine VL testing. South Africa (SA) has recommended routine VL testing since 2004. Progressively, the centralised HIV VL program managed by its National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) has undergone expansive growth. Retrospective de-identified VL data from 2013 to 2022 were evaluated to review program performance. Test volumes increased from 1,961,720 performed in 2013 to 45,334,864 in 2022. The median total in-laboratory turnaround time (TAT) ranged from 94 h (2015) to 51 h (2022). Implementation of two new assays improved median TATs in all laboratories. Samples of VL greater than 1000 copies/mL declined steadily. Despite initial increases, samples of fewer than 50 copies/mL stagnated at about 70% from 2019 and declined to 68% in 2022. Some variations between assays were observed. Overall, the SA VL program is successful. The scale of the VL program, the largest of its kind in the world by some margin, provides lessons for future public health programs dependent on laboratories for patient outcome and program performance monitoring.

National Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on HIV Virological Suppression in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) severely disrupted routine health care globally. This study assessed the impact of successive COVID-19 waves on HIV viral load (VL) suppression in South Africa, using the national public sector laboratory database. Guidelines recommend VL monitoring at 6 months after treatment initiation, annually once if suppressed, or more frequently if unsuppressed. METHODS: Specimen-level VL data were extracted for the period January 2019-December 2021. We assessed the national percentage of samples with a VL <50 (virological suppression), 50-999 (low-level viremia), and ≥1000 (viremia) copies/mL. Data were analyzed by calendar year and month. Data for 2019 (pre-COVID-19) were compared with the 2020 and 2021 calendar years (lockdowns imposed). The national number of COVID-19 cases was reported to indicate the wave periods as follows: 1 (ancestral)-June-August 2020; 2 (Beta)-December 2020-January 2021; 3 (Delta)-June-August 2021, and 4 (Omicron)-December 2021. RESULTS: Data are reported for 17,460,264 samples, with 5,608,733, 5,840,056, and 6,011,475 tests performed in 2019, 2020, and 2021 respectively. Overall, a VL of <50, 50-999, and ≥1000 copies/mL were reported for 69.4%, 17.3%, and 13.4% of samples, respectively. A VL <50 copies/mL was reported for 67.7%, 70.3%, and 70.0% of patients in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. For the 2020 and 2021 calendar years, the monthly percentage of patients with a VL <50 copies/mL ranged between 64.6% and 72.7%. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that COVID-19 has not had a substantial impact on the percentage of samples with virological suppression at the national level.

How South Africa Used National Cycle Threshold (Ct) Values to Continuously Monitor SARS-CoV-2 Laboratory Test Quality.

The high demand for SARS-CoV-2 tests but limited supply to South African laboratories early in the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a heterogenous diagnostic footprint of open and closed molecular testing platforms being implemented. Ongoing monitoring of the performance of these multiple and varied systems required novel approaches, especially during the circulation of variants. The National Health Laboratory Service centrally collected cycle threshold (Ct) values from 1,497,669 test results reported from 6 commonly used PCR assays in 36 months, and visually monitored changes in their median Ct within a 28-day centered moving average for each assays' gene targets. This continuous quality monitoring rapidly identified delayed hybridization of RdRp in the Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 assay due to the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant; S-gene target failure in the TaqPath™ COVID-19 assay due to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) and the B.1.1.529 (Omicron); and recently E-gene delayed hybridization in the Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 due to XBB.1.5. This near "real-time" monitoring helped inform the need for sequencing and the importance of multiplex molecular nucleic acid amplification technology designs used in diagnostics for patient care. This continuous quality monitoring approach at the granularity of Ct values should be included in ongoing surveillance and with application to other disease use cases that rely on molecular diagnostics.

Advancing HIV Drug Resistance Technologies and Strategies: Insights from South Africa's Experience and Future Directions for Resource-Limited Settings.

Monitoring of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) remains critical for ensuring countries attain and sustain the global goals for ending HIV as a public health threat by 2030. On an individual patient level, drug resistance results assist in ensuring unnecessary treatment switches are avoided and subsequent regimens are tailored on a case-by-case basis, should resistance be detected. Although there is a disparity in access to HIVDR testing in high-income countries compared to low- and middle-income countries (LMICS), more LMICs have now included HIVDR testing for individual patient management in some groups of patients. In this review, we describe different strategies for surveillance as well as where HIVDR testing can be implemented for individual patient management. In addition, we briefly review available technologies for HIVDR testing in LMICs, including Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing, and some point-of-care options. Finally, we describe how South Africa has implemented HIVDR testing in the public sector.

Impact of rilpivirine cross-resistance on long-acting cabotegravir-rilpivirine in low and middle-income countries.

Baseline rilpivirine drug resistance mutations (DRMs) are a risk factor for virological failure in patients treated with long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB/RPV LA). We investigated rilpivirine cross-resistance in treatment-naive and experienced patients in South Africa. One in 10 treatment-naive patients and 74.5% of patients failing treatment presented with rilpivirine DRMs. Our data suggest targeted genotyping may be required for patients initiating CAB/RPV LA, which significantly complicates the currently used public health approach.

Performance Evaluation of Four Qualitative RT-PCR Assays for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in late 2019, and its rapid spread around the globe led the World Health Organization to declare it a pandemic. Laboratory diagnostics provide important information to help control virus transmission, and molecular nucleic acid amplification tests have been recognized as the gold standard for the direct detection of viral genetic material. The main aim of this study was to independently evaluate the analytical performance of four molecular assays that were designed for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 on open testing platforms under emergency use approval, namely, the COVIWOK COVID-19 RT-PCR Meril COVID-19 One-step RT-PCR Kit, the AmoyDx Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Detection Kit, the Meril COVID-19 One-step RT-PCR Kit and the NeoPlex COVID-19 Detection Kit, as alternatives to the current standard of care (SOC) assays in-country. All of the evaluated assays showed an acceptable performance, with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 93.8% to 98.4%, compared to a SOC assay, with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of ≥0.9 (95% CI). In addition, the assays detected the AccuPlex reference material at 100 copies/mL, suggesting a good limit of detection. These assays provide suitable alternatives to the SOC assays that are currently available in-country, and these alternatives are acceptable for diagnostic use in South Africa. IMPORTANCE Laboratory diagnosis plays an important role in curbing the transmission of infection and reducing harmful delays in clinical and public health responses. Alternatives to the current standard of care assays for SARS-CoV-2 are important in order to overcome the challenges that are associated with global demands and supply shortages. Four molecular assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 that were designed for open testing platforms were evaluated in this study under emergency use approval. These assays had acceptable performance and provide suitable alternatives to the current standard of care assays that are available in-country. Their compatibilities with existing in-country amplification platforms make these assays convenient to use for diagnostic testing, both locally and globally These assays were recommended to the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) for patient care in South Africa.

Minimal Cross-resistance to Tenofovir in Children and Adolescents Failing ART Makes Them Eligible for Tenofovir-Lamivudine-Dolutegravir Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Fixed-dose combination of dolutegravir (DTG) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and lamivudine (3TC) likely improves adherence and has a favorable resistance profile. We evaluated predicted efficacy of TLD (TDF-3TC-DTG) in children and adolescents failing abacavir (ABC), zidovudine (AZT), or TDF containing regimens. METHODS: Drug resistance mutations were analyzed in a retrospective dataset of individuals <19 years of age, failing ABC (n = 293) AZT (n = 288) or TDF (n = 69) based treatment. Pol sequences were submitted to Stanford HIVdb v8.9. Genotypic susceptibility scores were calculated for various DTG-containing regimens. RESULTS: Genotypes were assessed for 650 individuals with a median age of 14 years (IQR 10-17 years). More individuals failed a protease inhibitor (PI)-based (78.3%) than a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)-based (21.7%) regimen. Most individuals in the AZT group (n = 288; 94.4%) failed a PI-based regimen, compared with 71.0% and 64.2% in the TDF (n = 69) and ABC group (n = 293). Genotypic sensitivity scores <2 to TLD were observed in 8.5% and 9.4% of ABC- and AZT-exposed individuals, compared with 23.2% in the TDF group. The M184V mutation was most often detected in the ABC group (70.6%) versus 60.0% and 52.4% in TDF and AZT groups. The presence of K65R was rare (n = 13, 2.0%) and reduced TLD susceptibility was commonly caused by accumulation of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-resistance to TDF was limited, further reducing concerns about use of transition to TLD in children and adolescents. The NADIA trial has subsequently shown that patients failing a TDF/3TC/EFV regimen can safely be transitioned to a TLD regimen but we do not have data for patients failing an ABC/3TC/NNRTI or PI regimens. Frequent virological monitoring is recommended after switch to DTG, especially in children continuing ABC in the backbone. Clinical studies correlating predicted resistance with clinical outcomes, especially in settings without access to genotyping, are required.

Guidance for SARS-CoV-2 RNA-Based Molecular Assay Analytical Performance Evaluations.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is frequently diagnosed through detection of viral RNA using nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) assays that are usually used in centralized settings. Following the publication of the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence, multiple diagnostic assays were launched in 2020. These assays require evaluation beyond manufacturer self-reported performance to determine whether they are suitable for use, meet country acceptance criteria, and are compatible with existing in-country platforms. In order to meet the demand for testing services, rapid yet robust assay performance evaluations are required. In our setting, these evaluation protocols required the use of residual patient specimens and reference materials, as typical clinical trials are time-consuming and limited by cost and the cyclical nature of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This protocol is designed to assist in the rapid and robust evaluation of nucleic acid-based assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using limited specimens, reference materials, and test kits. While it is specific for RNA-based assays, it can be adapted for fully automated analyses. The preparation and processing of evaluation panels is described, followed by methods for analytical precision analysis and data visualization. Assay robustness and scalability are briefly discussed as these can be critical for implementation. This protocol is designed to be flexible and alternative options are provided throughout the text where possible.

Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert® Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus Tests.

The Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 and Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV tests were rapidly developed and widely used during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. In response to emerging genetic variability, a new SARS-CoV-2 target (RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase) has been added to both tests: Xpert® Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test. A rapid evaluation of both tests was performed in South Africa, using residual respiratory specimens. Residual respiratory specimens (n = 125) were used to evaluate the Xpert® Xpress CoV-2 plus test and included 50 genotyped specimens. The Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test was assessed using 45 genotyped SARS-CoV-2 specimens, 10 influenza A, 10 influenza B and 20 respiratory syncytial virus specimens. Results were compared to in-country standard-of-care tests. Genotyped specimens tested the performance of the test under pressure from circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Reference material was included to assess the test limits and linearity. The Xpert® Xpress CoV-2 plus test performance compared to reference results across residual respiratory specimens was good (positive percentage agreement (PPA) = 95.2%, negative percentage agreement (NPA) = 95.0%) The Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus test showed good performance across all residual respiratory specimens (PPA = 100%, NPA = 98.3%). All genotyped variants of concern were detected by both tests. The Xpert® Xpress CoV-2 plus and Xpert® Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus tests can be used to diagnose SARS-CoV-2, and to diagnose and differentiate SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B and respiratory syncytial virus, respectively. The NPA was lower than the recommended 99%, but was influenced by the low number of negative specimens tested. The variants of concern assessed did not affect test performance. It is recommended that sites perform their own assessments compared to in-country standard-of-care tests.

A multi-center study comparing the analytical sensitivity and clinical concordance of three HIV-1 viral load assays.

BACKGROUND: HIV-1 viral load assays are essential tools for clinical management of people living with HIV-1. OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated concordance between three assays: the cobas® HIV-1 test for use on the cobas® 6800 and cobas® 8800 systems (cobas HIV-1); the COBAS® TaqMan® HIV-1 Test, v2.0 for use with the High Pure System and the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HIV-1 test, v2.0. Analytical sensitivity, precision and accuracy of all three methods were assessed using the WHO 2nd International Standard for HIV-1, with concentrations from 5 to 1000 copies/mL. Accuracy and concordance were evaluated using 212 clinical specimens. Overall percent agreement (OPA) was determined using three different thresholds used as medical decision points. RESULTS: The limit of detection was below 20 copies/mL for each assay. The hit rate for each assay was 100 % for concentrations ≥ 50 copies/mL. Only the cobas HIV-1 test generated quantifiable data for all replicates at 50 copies/mL. Between 50 and 400 copies/mL, results for all assays were accurate within 0.09 log10 copies/mL, with standard deviation less than 0.14 log10 copies/mL. The mean difference between paired results in clinical specimens ranged from -0.050 to 0.107 log10 copies/mL across all assay comparisons. The OPA between pairs of assays ranged from 94.8 to 98.1% at the 50 copies/mL cutoff, and improved to a range of 97.6-99.0% at the 200 copies/mL cutoff. At the 1000 copies/mL cutoff, OPA between assays was 98.5-99.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The cobas HIV-1 assay is highly sensitive, accurate and suitable for use in clinical practice.

Feasibility and clinical relevance of HIV-1 drug resistance testing in patients with low-level viraemia in South Africa.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of HIV genotyping at low-level viraemia (LLV) using an in-house assay in a South African population and the prevalence, as well as the clinical relevance, of drug resistance (HIVDR) in this population. METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, cohort study on patient samples with LLV referred for routine HIVDR testing at a public sector Johannesburg laboratory from August 2017 to October 2018. Genotyping was performed using a nested RT-PCR assay and Sanger sequencing. The genotyping success rate was evaluated for different viraemia categories. Sequences were loaded onto the Stanford HIVdb genotypic resistance tool (version 8.7) for drug resistance interpretation. RESULTS: Plasma samples from 159 HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced adults with LLV (5-999 copies/mL) were analysed. The in-house assay performed well with an overall success rate of 78.6% (125/159, 95% CI 71.6-84.3). The prevalence of drug resistance mutations in the LLV cohort was 79.2% (99/125, 95% CI 71.2-85.4) with most patients (n = 109, 68.6%) on a PI-based regimen at the time of genotyping. Of 125 sequences obtained, 73.6% (92/125) had ≥1 NRTI mutation while 70.4% (88/125) had ≥1 NNRTI mutation. Major PI mutations, including M46I and V82A, were detected in 7.2% (9/125) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Current South African virological failure guidelines may keep patients on failing regimens for longer than necessary. Our data suggest that genotyping at LLV is feasible and implementation could result in earlier identification and referral of patients requiring third-line regimens.

Preparing for the next pandemic: Lessons from rapid scale-up of SARS-CoV-2 testing in a South African high-throughput automated HIV molecular laboratory.

Africa's readiness to respond to the SARS-COV-2 pandemic was tested due to reliance on rapid turn-around-time of polymerase chain reaction results for clinical management, isolation and quarantine decisions. The NHLS HIV Molecular Laboratory in Johannesburg, South Africa, is one of the largest automated HIV molecular laboratories worldwide. Despite its extensive molecular capacity and experience in managing high volumes acquired from a large HIV program, significant challenges were encountered during its rapid transition to large scale SARS-CoV-2 testing. We describe the strategies employed to manage these challenges that resulted in a 30% improvement in SARS-CoV-2 test turn-around-time during the first wave peak during which approximately 25000 samples were tested per month, and further improvement during the second wave peak, with 81% within targeted turn-around-time.

Is there a role for doravirine in African HIV treatment programmes? A large observational resistance study in South Africa.

INTRODUCTION: Dolutegravir has replaced efavirenz in most low- and middle-income countries, due to better tolerability and formidable resistance profile, but dolutegravir side effects suggest alternatives are needed. We evaluated doravirine resistance in South Africa as a first step to assess whether doravirine may replace dolutegravir. METHODS: A retrospective dataset was analysed for predicted doravirine susceptibility, including sequences obtained from three patient groups. First, data from 277 patients initiating antiretroviral treatment (ART) were collected between February 2013 and October 2014 as part of a national survey. Second, data from 788 patients experiencing NNRTI-based ART failure were obtained between February 2013 and October 2014 as part of a national survey. Third, data derived from 584 patients who had genotypic drug resistance testing requested after NNRT-based failure as part of individual patient management between January 2016 and December 2019. Pol sequences were generated using validated population-based in-house genotyping and submitted to Stanford HIVdb v8.9. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Less than 5% of patients initiating ART presented with genotypic doravirine resistance, whereas most patients experiencing NNRTI-based ART failure presented with predicted intermediate (41.0%) or high-level resistance (43.8%) to doravirine. High-level resistance to doravirine was commonly predicted by the presence of at least three DRMs (79.7%). The predicted resistance profile to doravirine in ART-naïve patients is promising, but less so in those experiencing failure to first-generation NNRTIs. Accumulation of NNRTI DRMs seems to be an important factor in the poor resistance prediction for doravirine. CONCLUSIONS: Although doravirine is approved as initial therapy in patients who are ART-naïve, it is currently recommended to obtain a genotype prior to the initiation of ART. Clinical studies are needed to ascertain whether predicted resistance profiles in ART naïve and NNRTI-treated patients translate into poor clinical outcomes, especially in settings where genotypic resistance testing is not available.

Classification of HIV-1 virological treatment failure using the Roche cobas plasma separation card on cobas 8800 compared to dried blood spots on Abbott RealTime HIV-1.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of HIV-1 viral load (VL) is essential for monitoring antiretroviral treatment (ART) efficacy. In remote settings, dried blood spots (DBS) may be used as the specimen type. However, cellular components in DBS not present in the gold standard specimen type, plasma, may result in low specificity i.e., over-estimation of VL results from DBS compared to plasma. The Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay system has been reported to have improved specificity using DBS compared to other tests. A new specimen collection matrix, the cobas plasma separation card (PSC, Roche Molecular Systems), enables specimen collection from a finger prick or venous blood, using a multi-layer absorption and filtration design that results in a specimen similar to plasma. OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: We performed a direct comparison between VL results from PSC tested with the cobas 6800/8800 assay (c8800) and DBS tested with the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay. RESULTS: Overall concordance between PSC and plasma around the 1000 copies/mL threshold was high (>97%). Compared to VL measured using DBS and the RealTime assay, PSC and c8800 showed improved sensitivity (96.9% vs 90.6%) and specificity (97.4% vs. 87.2%) using plasma as the reference, as there were fewer patients with VL below 1000 copies/mL in plasma in whom VL was over this threshold using PSC compared to DBS. The limit of detection for PSC was lower than for DBS (575 vs. 2314 copies/mL). CONCLUSIONS: cobas PSC represents a promising specimen type for use with the cobas 6600/8800 system in settings where plasma cannot be used.

Early Diagnosis of HIV-1 and HIV-2 Using Cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 Qualitative Test: A Novel Qualitative Nucleic Acid Amplification Test for Plasma, Serum, and Dried Blood Spot Specimens.

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs) minimize the time from HIV infection to diagnosis, reducing transmission during acute HIV. NATs are especially useful for diagnosing HIV in children younger than 18 months and discriminating between HIV-1 and HIV-2. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of the cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 qualitative (cobas HIV-1/2 Qual) test for use on cobas 6800/8800 Systems. The results of adult plasma and serum samples and pediatric dried blood spots were compared with those of the recomLine HIV-1 & HIV-2 Immunoglobulin G serological test and COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 qualitative test, v2.0. Genotype inclusivity and limits of detection were determined, and sensitivity on seroconversion panels was compared with that in the Bio-Rad Geenius HIV 1/2 Confirmatory Assay, Abbott ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo serological test, and cobas TaqScreen MPX, v2.0. RESULTS: Concordance of cobas HIV-1/2 Qual test with the comparator serological test and COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan test was ≥99.6% with all sample types. Reactivity with all HIV genotypes was 100%. LOD in plasma samples was 14.8, 12.6, and 27.9 copies/mL for HIV-1 group M, HIV-1 group O, and HIV-2, respectively, with similar results for serum samples. LOD in dried blood spots was 255 copies/mL for HIV-1 and 984 copies/mL for HIV-2. HIV infection was detected 18.9 days and 8.5 days earlier than the confirmatory and serological assays, respectively, and at a similar time to the NAT. CONCLUSIONS: The cobas HIV-1/2 Qual test enables early and accurate diagnoses of HIV-1 and HIV-2 in adults and children across sample types. The assay could help avert transmission during acute HIV, simplify HIV diagnostic algorithms, and promote the survival of HIV-infected children.

Comparison of Alere q whole blood viral load with DBS and plasma viral load in the classification of HIV virological failure.

BACKGROUND: In remote settings, timely plasma separation and transportation to testing laboratories is an impediment to the access of HIV viral load (VL) testing. Potential solutions are whole blood testing through point of care (POC) assays or dried blood spots (DBS). METHODS: We evaluated the performance of a prototype Alere q whole blood VL protocol and compared it against plasma (Abbott RealTime HIV-1) and DBS VL (Abbott RealTime HIV-1 DBS revised prototype protocol and Roche CAP/CTM HIV-1 v2.0 DBS free virus elution protocol). Virological failure (VF) was defined at >1000 copies/ml. RESULTS: Of 299 samples, Alere q correctly classified VF in 61% versus 87% by Abbott DBS and 76% by Roche FVE. Performance varied across plasma VL categories. Alere q showed 100% sensitivity. Below 1000 copies/ml of plasma, Alere q demonstrated over-quantification, with 19% specificity. Abbott DBS had 91% sensitivity and the best overall correlation with plasma (r2 = 0.72). Roche FVE had the best specificity of 99% but reduced sensitivity of 52%, especially between 1000-10,000 copies/ml of plasma. Correlation was best for all assays at >10,000 copies/ml. CONCLUSION: Variability was prominent between the assays. Each method requires optimization to facilitate the implementation of a cut-off with optimal sensitivity and specificity for VF. Although Alere q whole blood assay exhibited excellent sensitivity, the poor specificity of only 19% would lead to unnecessary switching of regimens. Thus any VF detected would need to be confirmed by a more specific assay. Both the Abbott DBS and Roche FVE protocols showed good specificity, however sensitivity was reduced when the plasma VL was 1000-10,000 copies/ml. This could result in delays in detecting VF and accumulation of drug resistance. Field evaluation in settings that have adopted these DBS protocols are necessary.

Resistance in patients failing integrase strand transfer inhibitors: a call to replace raltegravir with dolutegravir in third-line treatment in South Africa.

Data on integrase resistance patterns in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is scarce. We assessed genotypic drug resistance in 43 patients with virological failure on integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) containing regimens as part of the third-line treatment program in South Africa. Of the raltegravir (RAL) exposed patients 20/34 (59%) had ≥1 major INSTI mutation, including two (6%) with dolutegravir (DTG) cross-resistance. DTG resistance was detected in one out of four DTG-exposed patients. Replacing RAL with DTG may reduce the risk of INSTI mutations. We recommend DTG drug resistance monitoring when DTG is introduced at a larger scale in LMICs.

Separation of Plasma from Whole Blood by Use of the cobas Plasma Separation Card: a Compelling Alternative to Dried Blood Spots for Quantification of HIV-1 Viral Load.

Plasma HIV viral load testing is the preferred means of monitoring antiretroviral treatment response. Dried blood spots (DBSs) hold considerable logistical advantages over EDTA samples, but they more frequently misclassify virological failure and have higher limits of detection (LoD). Plasma separation cards (PSCs) may overcome these limitations. Health workers collected EDTA whole blood by venipuncture and 140 µl of finger-prick blood by capillary tube from 53 HIV-infected adults. Capillary blood was immediately transferred to PSCs. Additionally, 432 EDTA samples from HIV-infected adults were spotted onto PSCs and analyzed together with the finger-prick samples. Specificity and sensitivity of PSC with paired EDTA-PSC samples tested on a cobas 6800/8800 system with the cobas HIV-1 test (cobas HIV) was determined. LoD (3rd HIV-1 WHO International Standard) and stability at a range of temperatures and storage durations was determined using cobas HIV and cobas AmpliPrep/cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test v2.0 (CAP/CTM). Of 132 specimens with quantitative values for paired EDTA-PSC samples, the mean log10 difference between samples was 0.05 copies/ml (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.01 to 0.11). The LoD for cobas HIV was 790.2 copies/ml and for CAP/CTM was 737.9 copies/ml. At 1,000 copies/ml, PSC sensitivity was 97.0% (128/132) and specificity was 97.2% (343/353). Results correlated well with those from EDTA samples (Deming R2 = 0.90). PSC results were unaffected by temperature and storage conditions. PSC samples correlate well with plasma viral load and have adequate sensitivity and specificity. The improved performance may be as a result of a reduction in contribution from cell-associated viral nucleic acids. The card provides an alternative sample collection technology to DBSs.