Integrated assessment modeling reveals near-channel management as cost-effective to improve water quality in agricultural watersheds.

Despite decades of policy that strives to reduce nutrient and sediment export from agricultural fields, surface water quality in intensively managed agricultural landscapes remains highly degraded. Recent analyses show that current conservation efforts are not sufficient to reverse widespread water degradation in Midwestern agricultural systems. Intensifying row crop agriculture and increasing climate pressure require a more integrated approach to water quality management that addresses diverse sources of nutrients and sediment and off-field mitigation actions. We used multiobjective optimization analysis and integrated three biophysical models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative portfolios of watershed management practices at achieving nitrate and suspended sediment reduction goals in an agricultural basin of the Upper Midwestern United States. Integrating watershed-scale models enabled the inclusion of near-channel management alongside more typical field management and thus directly the comparison of cost-effectiveness across portfolios. The optimization analysis revealed that fluvial wetlands (i.e., wide, slow-flowing, vegetated water bodies within the riverine corridor) are the single-most cost-effective management action to reduce both nitrate and sediment loads and will be essential for meeting moderate to aggressive water quality targets. Although highly cost-effective, wetland construction was costly compared to other practices, and it was not selected in portfolios at low investment levels. Wetland performance was sensitive to placement, emphasizing the importance of watershed scale planning to realize potential benefits of wetland restorations. We conclude that extensive interagency cooperation and coordination at a watershed scale is required to achieve substantial, economically viable improvements in water quality under intensive row crop agricultural production.

Predicting algal blooms: Are we overlooking groundwater?

Significant advances in understanding and predicting freshwater algal bloom dynamics have emerged in response to both increased occurrence and financial burden of nuisance and harmful blooms. Several factors have been highlighted as key controls of bloom occurrence, including nutrient dynamics, local hydrology, climatic perturbations, watershed geomorphology, biogeochemistry, food-web control, and algal competition. However, a major research gap continues to be the degree to which groundwater inputs modulate microbial biomass production and food-web dynamics at the terrestrial-aquatic interface. We present a synthesis of groundwater related algal bloom literature, upon which we derive a foundational hypothesis: long residence times cause groundwater to be geochemically and biologically distinct from surface water, allowing groundwater inputs to modulate algal bloom dynamics (growth, decline, toxicity) through its control over in-stream water chemistry. Distinct groundwater chemistry can support or prevent algal blooms, depending on specific local conditions. We highlight three mechanisms that influence the impact of groundwater discharge on algal growth: 1) redox state of the subsurface, 2) extent of water-rock interactions, and 3) stability of groundwater discharge. We underscore that in testing hypotheses related to groundwater control over algal blooms, it is critical to understand how changes in land use, water management, and climate will influence groundwater dynamics and, thus, algal bloom probabilities. Given this challenge, we argue that advances in both modeling and data integration, including genomics data and integrated process-based models that capture groundwater dynamics, are needed to illuminate mechanistic controls and improve predictions of algal blooms.