Sex differences in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Disparities between women and men persist in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite growing attention to sex-based differences in cardiovascular care, there are continued disparities in short- and long-term outcomes. Such disparities highlight the need to identify pathophysiologic differences in treatment patterns for stable ischemic heart disease, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-ACS), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). The role of age as an effect modifier should also be considered given that young women diagnosed with ACS continue to experience increased rates of in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. Both patient-directed and systems-based approaches remain integral to improve outcomes in cardiovascular care. While inadequate representation of women in clinical trials remains a barrier to the implementation of evidence-based therapies, a growing body of data has established the efficacy and safety of medications in women across acute coronary syndromes. This review seeks to feature existing data on the differential treatment guidelines, care implementation, and cardiovascular outcomes between women and men, highlighting next directions for clinical investigation.

Ischemia with No Obstructive Arteries (INOCA): A Review of the Prevalence, Diagnosis and Management.

Ischemia with no obstructive arteries (INOCA) is defined as patients with angiographic evidence of ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) at coronary angiography. INOCA is estimated to be prevalent is 3-4 million individuals with a female predominance. INOCA is composed of different endotypes including: microvascular dysfunction, vasospasm and a combination of the 2. Diagnosis of INOCA requires either non-invasive or invasive techniques aimed at assessing coronary flow reserve (CFR), Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) and spasm secondary to acetylcholine injection. Although INOCA is associated with an increased risk of MACE and a decrease in quality of life, less than half of patients are appropriately treated. Treatment of INOCA remains elusive with current therapeutics tailored towards the specific endotype and ongoing clinical trials looking to assess the efficacy of traditional CAD medications.

Latest from the WISE: Contributions to the Understanding of Ischemia and Heart Failure among Women with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries.

Since 1996, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) has been investigating pathophysiological processes underlying ischemic heart disease in women and related outcomes. Recent findings have focused on women with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) and their elevated risk for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This review summarizes the latest WISE findings related to INOCA and pre-HFpEF characteristics, addressing our understanding of contributions from traditional vs nontraditional risk factors in women.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to durable mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiogenic shock may require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) prior to durable mechanical circulatory support (dMCS) or heart transplantation (HTx). METHODS: We investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients with ECMO support as bridge to dMCS or HTx between 1/1/13 and 12/31/20. RESULTS: Of 57 patients who underwent bridging ECMO, 41 (72%) received dMCS (approximately half with biventricular support) and 16 (28%) underwent HTx, 13 (81%) after the 2018 UNOS allocation system change. ECMO → HTx patients had shorter ventilatory time (3.5 vs 7.5 days; p = 0.018), ICU stay (6 vs 18 days; p = 0.001), and less need for inpatient rehabilitation (18.8% vs 57.5%; p = 0.016). The 1-year survival post HTx was 81.3% in the ECMO → HTx group and 86.4% in the ECMO → dMCS group (p = 0.11). For those patients in the ECMO → dMCS group who did not undergo HTx, 1-year survival was significantly lower, 31.6% (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients on ECMO who undergo HTx, with or without dMCS bridge, have acceptable post-HTx survival. These findings suggest that HTx from ECMO is a viable option for carefully selected patients deemed acceptable to proceed with definitive advanced therapies, especially in the era of the new UNOS allocation system.