Psychometric methods for diagnosing and monitoring minimal hepatic encephalopathy -current validation level and practical use.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is cerebral dysfunction caused by liver failure and inflicts 30-40% of patients with liver cirrhosis during their disease course. Clinically manifest HE is often preceded by minimal HE (MHE) - a clinically undetectable cognitive disturbance closely associated with loss of quality of life. Accordingly, detecting and treating MHE improve the patients' daily functioning and prevent HE-related hospital admissions. The scope of this review article is to create an overview of the validation level and usage of psychometric tests used to detect MHE: Portosystemic hepatic encephalopathy test, continuous reaction time test, Stroop EncephalApp, animal naming test, critical flicker frequency test, and inhibitory control test. Our work is aimed at the clinician or scientist who is about to decide on which psychometric test would fit best in their clinic, cohort, or study. First, we outline psychometric test validation obstacles and requirements. Then, we systematically approach the literature on each test and select well-conducted studies to answer the following questions:• Which percentage of patients with cirrhosis does the test deem as having MHE?• Is the test able to predict clinically manifest HE?• Is there a well-known test-retest variation and inter-observer variation?• Is the test able to detect a treatment response?• Is the test result affected by age, educational level, gender, or comorbidities?

Carboplatin re-treatment in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Treatment of multi-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer represents a clinical challenge with limited choices. Anti-angiogenic therapy has shown great potential in combination with frontline-therapy. Studies investigating heavily pre-treated patients are few. This study investigated the effect of re-treating patients with carboplatin combined with bevacizumab and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a potential predictor of outcome. METHODS: This single-center study enrolled 73 multi-resistant ovarian cancer patients from 2008 to 2015. Patients were treated with a combination of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) and carboplatin (AUC5) every 3 weeks. Baseline plasma samples were analyzed for cfDNA levels. Treatment response was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria and CA125 blood values. RESULTS: The response rate according to RECIST and/or CA125 was 57%. Median number of cycles was 6. The median progression-free survival and overall survival was 5.0 and 11.2 months, respectively. Eighteen patients developed allergic reactions to carboplatin. Patients were grouped into two cfDNA-groups according to median value. The cfDNA value was correlated to progression-free survival (PFS, p = 0.015), but not to overall survival (OS, p = 0.067) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis both PFS and OS were highly correlated to the levels of cfDNA (PFS, hazard ratio = 1.87, p = 0.012; OS, hazard ratio = 1.67, p = 0.037) with patients with high levels of cfDNA having poorest outcome. CONCLUSION: Our results might provide guidance in cases with heavily pre-treated patients, where alternatives are limited. Carboplatin and bevacizumab treatment should be weighed against best supportive care, current non-platinum therapies and experimental treatment. cfDNA seems to offer prognostic insight.