Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc ; 2011: 1080-8, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22195169

RESUMO

We applied a hybrid Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) approach (NLP-ML) to assessment of health related quality of life (HRQOL). The approach uses text patterns extracted from HRQOL inventories and electronic medical records (EMR) as predictive features for training ML classifiers. On a cohort of 200 patients, our approach agreed with patient self-report (EQ5D) and manual audit of the EMR 65-74% of the time. In an independent cohort of 285 patients, we found no association of HRQOL (by EQ5D or NLP-ML) with quality measures of metabolic control (HbA1c, Blood Pressure, Lipids). In addition; while there was no association between patient self-report of HRQOL and cost of care, abnormalities in Usual Activities and Anxiety/Depression assessed by NLP-ML were 40-70% more likely to be associated with greater health care costs. Our method represents an efficient and scalable surrogate measure of HRQOL to predict healthcare spending in ambulatory diabetes patients.


Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Processamento de Linguagem Natural , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Ambulatório Hospitalar , Reconhecimento Automatizado de Padrão , Atenção Primária à Saúde
2.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 15(2): 198-202, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18096902

RESUMO

We examine the feasibility of a machine learning approach to identification of foot examination (FE) findings from the unstructured text of clinical reports. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) based system was constructed to process the text of physical examination sections of in- and out-patient clinical notes to identify if the findings of structural, neurological, and vascular components of a FE revealed normal or abnormal findings or were not assessed. The system was tested on 145 randomly selected patients for each FE component using 10-fold cross validation. The accuracy was 80%, 87% and 88% for structural, neurological, and vascular component classifiers, respectively. Our results indicate that using machine learning to identify FE findings from clinical reports is a viable alternative to manual review and warrants further investigation. This application may improve quality and safety by providing inexpensive and scalable methodology for quality and risk factor assessments at the point of care.


Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Doenças do Pé/diagnóstico , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos , Exame Físico/classificação , Coleta de Dados , Complicações do Diabetes/diagnóstico , Estudos de Viabilidade , , Humanos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Descritores
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA