Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther ; 32(3): 233-240, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27430637

RESUMO

To assess the safety and efficacy of routine use of ultrasound-guided puncture and the use of vascular closure device (VCD) in patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) through femoral access. This was a single-center, non-randomized clinical study that enrolled 513 patients undergoing EVT via femoral artery access in which hemostasis was achieved using VCDs (406-patient EXOSEAL arm and 107-patient PROGLIDE arm). All cases were performed by routine use of ultrasound-guided access. The primary endpoint was the achievement of hemostasis without periprocedural and 30-day incidence of major or minor access site-related complications. The primary endpoint was achieved in 91.6 % of the cases (470/513) with a higher success rate in the EXOSEAL arm (93.6). Major complications were observed in 5 patients (0.9 %) in total cohort and 3 patients (0.7 %) treated with EXOSEAL arm vs. 2 patients (1.8 %) with PROGLIDE arm (p = 0.32). Combined treatment two VCDs with the routine ultrasound guidance access for patients who underwent the EVT procedure showed high efficacy and safety outcomes.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Hemostasia Cirúrgica/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Dispositivos de Oclusão Vascular , Idoso , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Dispositivos de Oclusão Vascular/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...