Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med J Malaysia ; 77(3): 306-312, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35638486

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Third Party Health Administrators (TPA) has become an integral part in the field of funding healthcare for most parts in the world. Although they ensure access to medical care when out-of-pocket payment is required, TPAs have been found to impose unreasonable dictation in medicine prescriptions that undercuts doctors remuneration including paying very low medical consultation fees, types/methods of treatment and modalities for their policy holders. The objective of this study was to get the opinion of Malaysian doctors regarding the newly imposed policies and rates that these companies have forcibly dictated towards private primary care General Practitioners (GPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross sectional study, conveniently sampling private GPs currently practicing in Malaysia. A self-developed online questionnaire was sent out to the members via social media with the assistance of the Malaysian Medical Association the affiliates of Federation of Private Medical Practitioners Associations of Malaysia and Medical Practitioners Coalition Association of Malaysia. Data was collected from April to July 2021. A series of 7 short questions were asked in the survey to yield a higher response rate. A population to proportion sample size was calculated and a minimum of 365 responses were required. All data collected were collated and analysed in the SPSS v21.0 RESULTS: From a total of 7,000 GPs, 491 GPs (134.52% of intended sample size) responded to the questionnaire. The largest portion of respondents were from Selangor (21.79%). A total of 65.58% of the GPs felt that the RM 15 consultation fee dictated by the TPAs was unfair, 71.08% felt it was unfair that TPA overwrote certain investigations done or medicines given as over-treatment, 90.84% felt that TPAs had no jurisdiction to dictate the number of days of medication patients needed for chronic medical conditions, 95.52% did not agree that TPAs fix the price of each medication, 54.58% agreed that marking up medications from 5-15% of the original purchase price was fair and 68.64% agreed that they would boycott TPAs that were unreasonable with their dictation/demands. CONCLUSION: GPs generally disagreed with many new policies imposed by TPAs. These new policies might hinder the screening, management and early detection of chronic non communicable diseases here in Malaysia.


Assuntos
Clínicos Gerais , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Malásia , Políticas , Atenção Primária à Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...