Topical prostaglandin fixed combinations in UK primary care: observational study using data from the health improvement network.

PURPOSE: To describe the use of 3 prostaglandin/timolol fixed combinations (FCs) in UK primary care, to summarize characteristics of recipients, and to assess 12-month persistence. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included first-time recipients of latanoprost/timolol FC, bimatoprost/timolol FC, or travoprost/timolol FC treated between April 1, 2007, and November 30, 2008, identified in The Health Improvement Network database, a large database of anonymized longitudinal electronic medical records of patients treated in UK primary care. Eligible patients were = 18 years old at the index date (date of first prescription). Persistence, defined as a gap =60 days between consecutive prescriptions, was assessed through 12 months post-index for each cohort (Cox proportional hazards models). RESULTS: A total of 2,015 patients were included: latanoprost/timolol FC, n = 898 (44.6%); bimatoprost/timolol FC, n = 733 (36.4%); travoprost/timolol FC, n = 384 (19.1%). The mean age was approximately 72 years across cohorts (p = 0.792). Glaucoma was the diagnosis for >90% of patients in each cohort. Twelve-month persistence was similar across treatments: latanoprost/timolol FC: 38.2%; bimatoprost/timolol FC: 38.6%; travoprost/timolol FC: 38.3% (p = 0.985). Mean time to therapy change for nonpersistent patients was also similar: 143.3 ± 89.8, 151.0 ± 87.9, and 151.8 ± 87.7 days, respectively (p = 0.095). Among persistent patients, additional therapy was prescribed for 36.2%, 41.7%, and 41.5% of patients, respectively. Among nonpersistent patients, 64.0%, 70.4%, and 69.2%, respectively, restarted the index therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The largest proportion of first-time recipients of prostaglandin/beta-blocker FC products treated in UK primary care was prescribed latanoprost/timolol FC. Twelve-month persistence was similar (<40%) across the 3 FCs evaluated.

Is relative leg length a biomarker of childhood nutrition? Long-term follow-up of the Hyderabad Nutrition Trial.

BACKGROUND: Relative leg length is frequently used as a biomarker of childhood nutrition in epidemiological studies, but evidence is lacking. We examined the association between supplemental nutrition in pregnancy and childhood and relative proportions of components of height in adolescence. METHODS: In a community trial of nutritional supplementation, villages from adjacent administrative areas were selected to serve as intervention (n = 15) and control (n = 14) arms. In the intervention villages, balanced protein-calorie supplementation (2.51 MJ, 20 g protein) was offered daily to pregnant women and their offspring until the age of 6 years. Children born in the trial were re-examined 15 years later to assess components of height. RESULTS: A total of 1165 adolescents (intervention: 654, 49% of trial participants; control: 511, 41% of trial participants) aged 13-18 years were examined. Supplemented children were 10 mm taller [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4 to 18.7 mm], but almost all of the increase was in trunk length (9 mm, 95% CI: 2.6 to 15.4 mm). The age- and gender-adjusted ß-coefficients for the association of nutritional supplementation with relative trunk, leg and lower leg lengths (expressed as standard deviation scores) were 0.26 (95% CI: 0.11 to 0.42), 0.08 (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.19) and 0.03 (95% CI: -0.08 to 0.15) respectively, thereby unsupportive of cephalocaudal gradient in growth. CONCLUSIONS: In this nutritional supplementation trial in an undernourished population, we were unable to confirm relative leg length as a biomarker of childhood nutrition. Alternative explanations may underlie the reported associations between childhood conditions and relative leg length.

Evaluation of varenicline as an aid to smoking cessation in UK general practice - a THIN database study.

OBJECTIVES: Varenicline is a licensed smoking cessation medication in the EU, USA and many other countries worldwide. This study was designed to assess its effectiveness in a UK general practice setting. METHODS: The main outcome measure was the rate of smoking cessation, defined as the seven-day point prevalence after six months from starting varenicline. Varenicline users were identified from records in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. A questionnaire on smoking cessation was sent to patients who commenced treatment close to the selection date (six months prior to the date of questionnaire dispatch). RESULTS: The response rate was 26.4%: 193 responses were received. Ninety percent had previously attempted to stop smoking and 87.4% had used nicotine replacement therapy during the previous attempt to stop smoking. The overall smoking cessation rate was 49.5%. There was a strong association between the duration of varenicline treatment and smoking cessation. Patients who reported using varenicline for 9-12 weeks were 11 times more likely to stop smoking than those who completed less than two weeks of treatment. There was some evidence that patients with a longer history of smoking were less likely to stop. No association was observed between smoking cessation and: previous number of cigarettes smoked per day; number of previous attempts to stop smoking; or motivations for stopping. CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline appeared to be a useful pharmacological aid to smoking cessation in a general practice setting. The observed effectiveness was similar to the efficacy estimates from previously reported clinical trials. However, the response rate was lower than expected and responders tended to be older, more likely to suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and to live in more affluent areas than non-responders. Responses were self-reported and not clinically validated therefore recall bias may be an issue.