Impact of lens case hygiene guidelines on contact lens case contamination.

PURPOSE: Lens case contamination is a risk factor for microbial keratitis. The effectiveness of manufacturers' lens case cleaning guidelines in limiting microbial contamination has not been evaluated in vivo. This study compared the effectiveness of manufacturers' guidelines and an alternative cleaning regimen. METHODS: A randomized cross-over clinical trial with two phases (n = 40) was performed. Participants used the lens types of their choice in conjunction with the provided multipurpose solution (containing polyhexamethylene biguanide) for daily wear. In the manufacturers' guideline phase, cases were rinsed with multipurpose solution and air dried. In the alternative regimen phase, cases were rubbed, rinsed with solution, tissue wiped, and air-dried face down. The duration of each phase was 1 month. Lens cases were collected at the end of each phase for microbiological investigation. The levels of microbial contamination were compared, and compliance to both regimens was assessed. RESULTS: The case contamination rate was 82% (32/39) in the manufacturers' guideline group, compared with 72% (28/39) in the alternative regimen group. There were significantly fewer (p = 0.004) colony forming units (CFU) of bacteria from cases used by following the alternative regimen (CFU range of 0 to 10, and median of 12 CFU per well) compared with that of the manufacturer's guidelines (CFU range of 0 to 10, and median of 28 CFU per well). The compliance level between both guidelines was not significantly different (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The alternative guidelines are more effective in eliminating microbial contamination from lens cases than that of the current manufacturer's guideline. Simply incorporating rubbing and tissue-wiping steps in daily case hygiene reduces viable organism contamination.

Do swimming goggles limit microbial contamination of contact lenses?

PURPOSE: Wearing goggles over contact lenses while swimming is often recommended by eye care professionals. Limited data are available to assess this recommendation. The purpose of this study was to examine whether wearing goggles while swimming limits bacterial colonization on contact lenses and whether the type of lens worn affects contamination rates. METHODS: Twenty-three subjects underwent two swimming sessions at an ocean (salt water) pool (Maroubra beach Rock Pool, Sydney, Australia). Silicone hydrogel (Ciba Focus Night and Day) or hydrogel lenses (Ciba Focus Daily) were inserted into subjects' eyes before 30 min of swimming sessions, and subjects used modified goggles to mimic goggled and non-goggled conditions. At the end of each session, lenses were collected for microbial investigation. Viable bacterial colonies were classified as gram positive and gram negative and enumerated. The level of bacterial colonization on contact lenses between goggled and non-goggled conditions and between the two lens materials were compared. RESULTS: The range of colony forming units recovered from goggled lenses were 0 to 930 compared with 0 to 1210 on non-goggled lenses. The majority of subjects (16/23) had more microorganisms in the non-goggled condition than when wearing goggles (p = 0.03). Gram negative organisms were found in three non-goggled lenses. No significant difference was shown in the number of bacteria isolated from silicone hydrogel and hydrogel lenses (p > 0.6) irrespective of wearing goggles. Water samples had consistently higher numbers of bacterial counts than those adhered to the lenses; however, no association was found between the number of bacteria in the water sample and those found on the contact lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Consistently, fewer bacterial colonies were found on the goggled contact lens, thus suggesting goggles offer some protection against bacterial colonization of contact lenses while swimming. These data would support the recommendation encouraging lens wearers to use goggles while swimming.

Contact lens case contamination during daily wear of silicone hydrogels.

PURPOSE: Contamination of contact lens cases has been associated with the production of adverse responses in the eye during contact lens wear. This study aimed to evaluate the contamination rate and types of microbes contaminating cases during use of contact lens disinfecting solutions and silicone hydrogel lenses. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two participants were allocated to one or more groups. The participants wore one or more of three silicone hydrogel lenses and used one or more of four contact lens disinfecting solutions. Cases were collected after use for 1 month and sent for routine microbial testing. The rate of contamination of cases and the types of microbes contaminating cases were evaluated. RESULTS: Between 76 and 92% of all cases were contaminated. Use of different contact lenses did not affect contamination rate or the types of microbes isolated from cases. Use of AQuify (PHMB as disinfectant) was associated with the highest contamination rate (92%; p = 0.015) of cases for any microbe. Level and type of contamination with use of ClearCare (H2O2) was similar to use of PHMB (polyhexamethylene biguanide)- or Polyquat/Aldox-containing solutions. There was no difference in contamination rate of cases by fungi or Gram-positive bacteria, but for Gram-negative bacteria, use of Opti-Free Express (Polyquat and Aldox as disinfectants) resulted in a lower contamination rate (7% vs. 29 to 45%; p < 0.001). The average number of microbes contaminating a case was significantly less for Opti-Free Express (223 +/- 1357 cfu/case) compared with Opti-Free RepleniSH (Polyquat and Aldox as disinfectants; 63,244 +/- 140,630 cfu/case; p < 0.001), driven mostly by differences in numbers of Gram-negative bacteria, particularly contamination by Delftia acidovorans in cases exposed to Opti-Free RepleniSH. CONCLUSIONS: Different disinfecting solutions used during storage in cases result in different levels of contamination and contamination by different types of microbes. These differences are not simply because of the types of disinfectants used, suggesting that other excipients in, or formulation of, the solution affect contact lens storage case contamination.

Profile and frequency of microbial contamination of contact lens cases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency level and profile of contact lens storage case contamination in asymptomatic contact lens wearers and to examine whether different areas of the same lens case may show a different rate and profile of contamination. The relationship between lens storage case contamination and the age of the lens storage case was also examined. METHODS: Sixty-four lens cases and case age information were collected from asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Lens cases were sampled at two locations, the upper rim and the lower base. The samples underwent microbiological investigation for recovery of bacteria and fungi. Contamination rate between the two sampling locations and the relationship between the contamination levels and the age of the lens case were analyzed. RESULTS: Contamination occurred in 58% (37 of 64) of lens cases. The most frequently recovered microorganisms were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (51%, 19 of 37), Bacillus spp. (43%,16 of 37), and fungi (27%,10 of 37). For flat-well lens cases, higher numbers of microorganisms were recovered from the upper rim than that from the lower base (p = 0.02), and a greater variety of Gram-negative bacteria were recovered from the upper rim. A higher recovery rate of Micrococcus spp. (p = 0.02; in flat cases) and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (p = 0.01; for both flat and basket type cases) was found from the base of the case well compared with the upper rim. For stand-up cases, higher numbers of microorganisms were recovered from the lens basket compared to the upper hinge (p = 0.047). Lens cases that were <9 months of age had lower levels of contamination (p = 0.013) than older cases. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent replacement of lens cases may reduce microbial contamination. Future studies should specify the areas swabbed in the lens case. Better lens storage case design and additional hygiene attention need to be introduced to reduce contamination in these "risky" areas.

Lid and conjunctival micro biota during contact lens wear in children.

PURPOSE: To determine the types of microorganisms and their frequency of isolation on the external ocular surface in children wearing soft contact lenses on a daily wear schedule. METHODS: Children aged 8 to 14 years were fitted with commercially available, soft contact lenses which were worn on a daily wear basis. The upper bulbar conjunctiva and the lower lid margins of each eye were swabbed at baseline and then at 6-monthly intervals for 2 years during lens wear. Swabs were processed, cultured and microorganisms identified using standard microbiological techniques. RESULTS: At baseline, 36% of the upper bulbar conjunctivae and 53% of the lower lid margins were contaminated with predominantly gram-positive bacteria. Recovery of samples with positive growth from the upper bulbar conjunctivae decreased during lens wear and ranged from 27 to 14%. The difference was statistically significant at the 12-month visit(14%, p = 0.011). The lower lid margins generally showed similar levels of contamination as at baseline except for less contamination at the 12-month visit (33%) (p = 0.05). Staphylococcus epidermidis and Propionibacterium sp. were the predominant microorganisms isolated from both the sites with and without lens wear. Gram-negative bacteria were infrequent and when isolated, the numbers of colonies were few. Fungus was isolated in a small percent (ranging from 0 to 4.8%) of eyes at various time points. CONCLUSIONS: The external ocular surface of children is contaminated with gram-positive bacteria that are resident microbiota. During lens wear, there was a trend for lesser recovery of organisms from the upper bulbar conjunctival samples,but there was no change in the type of microorganisms isolated. At all times, lower lid margins showed consistently greater colonization and is a source of potential contamination of the conjunctival surface.

Bacterial populations on high-Dk silicone hydrogel contact lenses: effect of length of wear in asymptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Ocular infection and inflammation during extended wear with hydrogel lenses are often associated with contamination of the lenses with bacteria. This study examines the colonisation of a high-Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens worn on a 30-night extended wear basis (continuous wear) during asymptomatic lens wear. METHODS: Worn lenses were collected aseptically and placed in sterile vials. Microbial growth on various media was enumerated and the number of colony-forming units per whole lens was calculated. The proportions of samples contaminated with the bacteria and the extent of contamination were compared after one month, six months and two years of continuous wear with monthly replacement. The proportion of lenses that were sterile was calculated. RESULTS: The most frequently isolated and most numerous microbes that colonised the contact lenses during wear were the coagulase-negative staphylococci (in particular Staphylococcus epidermidis), followed by Propionibacterium sp. The frequency of isolation of the majority of bacterial isolates did not increase over time. Generally, lenses were sparsely colonised during asymptomatic wear. CONCLUSION: Up to two years continuous wear of silicone hydrogel lenses of the type used in this study does not appear to alter the types and number of bacteria that colonise the eye during wear, when lenses are replaced on a monthly schedule and the patients remain asymptomatic.