Characterizing the relationship between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and assessing the impact of a nursing-focused CLABSI reduction intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on CLABSI rate and characterize the patients who developed a CLABSI. We also examined the impact of a CLABSI-reduction quality-improvement project in patients with and without COVID-19. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Academic 889-bed tertiary-care teaching hospital in urban Los Angeles. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Inpatients 18 years and older with CLABSI as defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). INTERVENTION(S): CLABSI rate and patient characteristics were analyzed for 2 cohorts during the pandemic era (March 2020-August 2021): COVID-19 CLABSI patients and non-COVID-19 CLABSI patients, based on diagnosis of COVID-19 during admission. Secondary analyses were non-COVID-19 CLABSI rate versus a historical control period (2019), ICU CLABSI rate in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 patients, and CLABSI rates before and after a quality- improvement initiative. RESULTS: The rate of COVID-19 CLABSI was significantly higher than non-COVID-19 CLABSI. We did not detect a difference between the non-COVID-19 CLABSI rate and the historical control. COVID-19 CLABSIs occurred predominantly in the ICU, and the ICU COVID-19 CLABSI rate was significantly higher than the ICU non-COVID-19 CLABSI rate. A hospital-wide quality-improvement initiative reduced the rate of non-COVID-19 CLABSI but not COVID-19 CLABSI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 have a significantly higher CLABSI rate, particularly in the ICU setting. Reasons for this increase are likely multifactorial, including both patient-specific and process-related issues. Focused quality-improvement efforts were effective in reducing CLABSI rates in non-COVID-19 patients but were less effective in COVID-19 patients.

Relationship between cardio-ankle vascular index and obstructive coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is an inexpensive, noninvasive, office-based method to evaluate arterial stiffness in the aorta and legs, which reflects the degree of coronary atherosclerosis. It has been applied clinically to assess arterial stiffness in patients who were diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke and those at risk. We intend to evaluate relationship between the CAVI and obstructive CAD. METHODS: We enrolled 285 individuals with mean age of 55.8 ± 13.5 years, clinically referred for Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scoring and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) at our site. After informed consent, CAVI measurements were done using a vascular screening system, VaSera VS-1500 AU (FUKUDA Denshi) on the same day of CCTA. CAC was measured using the Agatston method. A semiquantitative scale was used by CCTA readers to grade the extent of luminal stenosis as a percentage of the vessel diameter using visual estimations. We evaluated if CAVI was associated with severe stenosis (>50%) or CAC >100, defined as obstructive CAD. RESULTS: The degree of CAC and severe coronary stenosis demonstrated significant correlation with CAVI (r = 0.44, P ≤ 0.0001 and r = 0.43, P ≤ 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that CAVI measure of 7.8 was an optimal cut-point for sensitivity and specificity in detecting obstructive CAD. Unadjusted logistic regression demonstrated CAVI >7.8, significantly associated with obstructive CAD [odds ratio (OR) = 4.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.0-10.56), P = 0.0003] and CAC score >100 [OR = 6.96, 95% CI (3.68-13.17), P < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: CAVI reflects coronary atherosclerosis and may be used as a screening tool for early identification of subclinical atherosclerosis in preventive care and optimize management.

Access to transportation for Chittenden County Vermont older adults.

BACKGROUND: Aging often leads to decreased independence and mobility, which can be detrimental to health and well-being. The growing population of older adults will create a greater need for reliable transportation. AIMS: Explore whether and how lack of transportation has compromised areas of daily lives in older adults. METHODS: 1221 surveys with 36 questions assessing transportation access, usage, and impact on activities were distributed to Chittenden County, Vermont older adults; 252 met criteria for analysis. RESULTS: Older adults reported overwhelming difficulty getting to activities considered important, with 69 % of participants delaying medical appointments due to transportation barriers. Although family and friends represent a primary method of transportation, older adults reported difficulty asking them for help. DISCUSSION: Lack of accessible transportation leads to missed healthcare appointments and social isolation, which may have detrimental effects on older adults' quality of life. CONCLUSION: Many older adults face significant transportation challenges that negatively affect their health and well-being.