Fluid shear stress promotes embryonic stem cell pluripotency via interplay between ß-catenin and vinculin in bioreactor culture.

The expansion of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) as aggregates in stirred suspension bioreactors is garnering attention as an alternative to adherent culture. However, the hydrodynamic environment in the bioreactor can modulate PSC behavior, pluripotency and differentiation potential in ways that need to be well understood. In this study, we investigated how murine embryonic stem cells (mESCs) sense fluid shear stress and modulate a noncanonical Wnt signaling response to promote pluripotency. mESCs showed higher expression of pluripotency marker genes, Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog in the absence of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) in stirred suspension bioreactors compared to adherent culture, a phenomenon we have termed mechanopluripotency. In bioreactor culture, fluid shear promoted the nuclear translocation of the less well-known pluripotency regulator ß-catenin and concomitant increase of c-Myc expression, an upstream regulator of Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog. We also observed similar ß-catenin nuclear translocation in LIF-free mESCs cultured on E-cadherin substrate under defined fluid shear stress conditions in flow chamber plates. mESCs showed lower shear-induced expression of pluripotency marker genes when ß-catenin was inhibited, suggesting that ß-catenin signaling is crucial to mESC mechanopluripotency. Key to this process is vinculin, which is known to rearrange and associate more strongly with adherens junctions in response to fluid shear. When the vinculin gene is disrupted, we observe that nuclear ß-catenin translocation and mechanopluripotency are abrogated. Our results indicate that mechanotransduction through the adherens junction complex is important for mESC pluripotency maintenance.

Cell-Based Therapy Manufacturing in Stirred Suspension Bioreactor: Thoughts for cGMP Compliance.

Cell-based therapy (CBT) is attracting much attention to treat incurable diseases. In recent years, several clinical trials have been conducted using human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), and other potential therapeutic cells. Various private- and government-funded organizations are investing in finding permanent cures for diseases that are difficult or expensive to treat over a lifespan, such as age-related macular degeneration, Parkinson's disease, or diabetes, etc. Clinical-grade cell manufacturing requiring current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) has therefore become an important issue to make safe and effective CBT products. Current cell production practices are adopted from conventional antibody or protein production in the pharmaceutical industry, wherein cells are used as a vector to produce the desired products. With CBT, however, the "cells are the final products" and sensitive to physico- chemical parameters and storage conditions anywhere between isolation and patient administration. In addition, the manufacturing of cellular products involves multi-stage processing, including cell isolation, genetic modification, PSC derivation, expansion, differentiation, purification, characterization, cryopreservation, etc. Posing a high risk of product contamination, these can be time- and cost- prohibitive due to maintenance of cGMP. The growing demand of CBT needs integrated manufacturing systems that can provide a more simple and cost-effective platform. Here, we discuss the current methods and limitations of CBT, based upon experience with biologics production. We review current cell manufacturing integration, automation and provide an overview of some important considerations and best cGMP practices. Finally, we propose how multi-stage cell processing can be integrated into a single bioreactor, in order to develop streamlined cGMP-compliant cell processing systems.

An overview of forensic drug testing methods and their suitability for harm reduction point-of-care services.

Given the current opioid crisis around the world, harm reduction agencies are seeking to help people who use drugs to do so more safely. Many harm reduction agencies are exploring techniques to test illicit drugs to identify and, where possible, quantify their constituents allowing their users to make informed decisions. While these technologies have been used for years in Europe (Nightlife Empowerment & Well-being Implementation Project, Drug Checking Service: Good Practice Standards; Trans European Drugs Information (TEDI) Workgroup, Factsheet on Drug Checking in Europe, 2011; European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, An Inventory of On-site Pill-Testing Interventions in the EU: Fact Files, 2001), they are only now starting to be utilized in this context in North America. The goal of this paper is to describe the most common methods for testing illicit substances and then, based on this broad, encompassing review, recommend the most appropriate methods for testing at point of care.Based on our review, the best methods for point-of-care drug testing are handheld infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and ion mobility spectrometry; mass spectrometry is the current gold standard in forensic drug analysis. It would be prudent for agencies or clinics that can obtain the funding to contact the companies who produce these devices to discuss possible usage in a harm reduction setting. Lower tech options, such as spot/color tests and immunoassays, are limited in their use but affordable and easy to use.