Drought then wildfire reveals a compound disturbance in a resprouting forest.

The frequency and intensity of forest disturbances, such as drought and fire, are increasing globally, with an increased likelihood of multiple disturbance events occurring in short succession. Disturbances layered over one another may influence the likelihood or intensity of subsequent events (a linked disturbance) or impact response and recovery trajectories (a compound disturbance), with substantial implications for ecological spatiotemporal vulnerability. This study evaluates evidence for disturbance interactions of drought followed by wildfire in a resprouting eucalypt-dominated forest (the Northern Jarrah Forest) in southwestern Australia. Sites were stratified by drought (high, low), from previous modeling and ground validation, and fire severity (high, moderate, unburnt), via remote sensing using the relative difference normalized burn ratio (RdNBR). Evidence of a linked disturbance was assessed via fine fuel consumption and fire severity. Compound disturbance effects were quantified at stand scale (canopy height, quadratic mean diameter, stem density) and stem scale (mortality). There was no evidence of prior drought influencing fine fuel consumption or fire severity and, hence, no evidence of a linked disturbance. However, compound disturbance effects were evident; stands previously affected by drought experienced smaller shifts in canopy height, quadratic mean diameter, and stem density than stands without prior drought impact. At the stem scale, size and fire severity were the strongest determinants of stem survival. Proportional resprouting height was greater in high drought sites than in low drought sites (p < 0.01), meaning, structurally, the low drought stands decreased in height more than the high drought stands. Thus, a legacy of the drought was evident after the wildfire. Although these resprouting eucalypt forests have been regarded as particularly resilient, this study illustrates how multiple disturbances can overwhelm the larger tree component and promote an abundance of smaller stems. We suggest that this is early evidence of a structural destabilization of these forests under a more fire-prone, hotter, and drier future climate.

Drought can offset potential water use efficiency of forest ecosystems from rising atmospheric CO2.

Increasing atmospheric CO2 is both leading to climate change and providing a potential fertilisation effect on plant growth. However, southern Australia has also experienced a significant decline in rainfall over the last 30 years, resulting in increased vegetative water stress. To better understand the dynamics and responses of Australian forest ecosystems to drought and elevated CO2, the magnitude and trend in water use efficiency (WUE) of forests, and their response to drought and elevated CO2 from 1982 to 2014 were analysed, using the best available model estimates constrained by observed fluxes from simulations with fixed and time-varying CO2. The ratio of gross primary productivity (GPP) to evapotranspiration (ET) (WUEe) was used to identify the ecosystem scale WUE, while the ratio of GPP to transpiration (Tr) (WUEc) was used as a measure of canopy scale WUE. WUE increased significantly in northern Australia (p < 0.001) for woody savannas (WSA), whereas there was a slight decline in the WUE of evergreen broadleaf forests (EBF) in the southeast and southwest of Australia. The lag of WUEc to drought was consistent and relatively short and stable between biomes (≤3 months), but notably varied for WUEe, with a long time-lag (mean of 10 months). The dissimilar responses of WUEe and WUEc to climate change for different geographical areas result from the different proportion of Tr in ET. CO2 fertilization and a wetter climate enhanced WUE in northern Australia, whereas drought offset the CO2 fertilization effect in southern Australia.

Contribution of Binary Organic Layers to Soil Water Repellency: A Molecular Level Perspective.

Soil water repellency (SWR) is an extensively occurring phenomenon on natural and agricultural soils with a severe impact on soil water relations and thus crop yields and ecosystem productivity. It is caused by long chain amphiphilic compounds that originate from plant cuticular waxes. However, the severity of SWR varies with soil physical properties and the concentration of the compounds closely associated with producing hydrophobic coatings on soil surfaces. The induction of SWR by hexadecane, isopropyl tetradecanoate, and palmitic acid (PA), as pure (individual) coatings and as coatings composed of binary mixtures, was investigated by applying a range of loadings on acid-washed sand (AWS) (300-500 µm diameter) and AWS with 5% kaolinite. Molarity of ethanol droplet (MED) tests were conducted to assess the severity of SWR. Palmitic acid was very effective at inducing SWR at loadings of >0.5 × 10-6 mol g-1. Hexadecane and isopropyl tetradecanoate had no effect on SWR when applied as single component coatings. However, when hexadecane was combined with palmitic acid, it enhanced the SWR effect of palmitic acid. In comparison, isopropyl tetradecanoate was found to partially mitigate the SWR caused by palmitic acid. The experimental measurements of SWR were complemented by fully atomistic molecular dynamics simulations that suggested variations of SWR could be explained through molecular level interactions, packing on different soil mineral surfaces and the surface characteristics of the mineral surfaces. In addition, H-donor interactions of PA were found to be instrumental in intermolecular and surface interactions. Furthermore, cohesion and packing of hydrocarbon chains were found to be important parameters favoring surface adhesion, which in turn led to the formation of hydrophobic molecular coatings. The finding that ester derivatives of long chain fatty acids do not induce water repellency suggests that the introduction of chemical or biological processes that promote esterification of fatty acids could be a mechanism for reducing soil water repellency in agricultural soils.

Carbon consequences of drought differ in forests that resprout.

Prolonged drought and intense heat-related events trigger sudden forest die-off events and have now been reported from all forested continents. Such die-offs are concerning given that drought and heatwave events are forecast to increase in severity and duration as climate change progresses. Quantifying consequences to carbon dynamics and storage from die-off events are critical for determining the current and future mitigation potential of forests. We took stand measurements five times over 2+ years from affected and unaffected plots across the Northern Jarrah Forest, southwestern Australia, following an acute drought/heatwave in 2011. We found a significant loss of live standing carbon (49.3 t ha-1 ), and subsequently a significant increase in the dead standing carbon pool by 6 months post-die-off. Of the persisting live trees, 38% experienced partial mortality contributing to the rapid regrowth and replenishment (82%-88%) of labile carbon pools (foliage, twigs, and branches) within 26 months. Such regrowth was not substantial in terms of net carbon changes within the timeframe of the study but does reflect the resprouting resilience of this forest type. Dead carbon generated by the die-off may persist for centuries given low fragmentation and decay rates resulting in low biogenic emission rates relative to other forest types. However, future fire may threaten persistence of both dead and live pools via combustion and mortality of live tissue and impaired regrowth capacity. Resprouting forests are commonly regarded as resilient systems, however, a changing climate could see vulnerable portions of forests become carbon sources rather than carbon sinks.

Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited.

The possibility of using bioenergy as a climate change mitigation measure has sparked a discussion of whether and how bioenergy production contributes to sustainable development. We undertook a systematic review of the scientific literature to illuminate this relationship and found a limited scientific basis for policymaking. Our results indicate that knowledge on the sustainable development impacts of bioenergy production is concentrated in a few well-studied countries, focuses on environmental and economic impacts, and mostly relates to dedicated agricultural biomass plantations. The scope and methodological approaches in studies differ widely and only a small share of the studies sufficiently reports on context and/or baseline conditions, which makes it difficult to get a general understanding of the attribution of impacts. Nevertheless, we identified regional patterns of positive or negative impacts for all categories - environmental, economic, institutional, social and technological. In general, economic and technological impacts were more frequently reported as positive, while social and environmental impacts were more frequently reported as negative (with the exception of impacts on direct substitution of GHG emission from fossil fuel). More focused and transparent research is needed to validate these patterns and develop a strong science underpinning for establishing policies and governance agreements that prevent/mitigate negative and promote positive impacts from bioenergy production.