A 1-year follow-on study from a randomised, head-to-head, multicentre, open-label study of two pandemic influenza vaccines in children.

INTRODUCTION: Pandemic influenza A H1N1 infections occurred worldwide from 2009. Children were particularly vulnerable. Novel vaccines were used during the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To assess the persistence of antibody to H1N1 influenza 1 year after children aged 6 months to 12 years had been immunised with two doses of either a non-adjuvanted whole-virion H1N1 influenza vaccine or an AS03B-adjuvanted split-virion H1N1 influenza vaccine; and also to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity in this population of a single dose of 2010-11 trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine. DESIGN: Multicentre, open-label, follow-on from randomised, head-to-head trial. SETTING: Five UK sites (Southampton, Oxford, Bristol, London and Exeter). PARTICIPANTS: Children who completed last year's head-to-head randomised study were invited to participate. Children who had subsequently received a further dose of H1N1 vaccine, or who had already received a dose of 2010-11 trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine, were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: In the previous study, children were randomised (in a 1 : 1 ratio) to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either a non-adjuvanted whole-virion H1N1 influenza vaccine or an AS03B-adjuvanted split-virion H1N1 influenza vaccine. In this follow-on study, a blood sample was taken to assess the persistence of antibody 1 year later, followed by administration of one 0.5 ml-dose of trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine. A second blood sample was taken 3 weeks later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison between vaccines of the percentage of participants with a microneutralisation (MN) titre ≥ 1 : 40 and a haemagglutination titre ≥ 1 : 32, 1 year after vaccination. Immunogenicity of the trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine was assessed 3 weeks after vaccination by both the MN and the haemagglutination inhibition (HI) titres. Reactogenicity data were recorded for 7 days after vaccination. RESULTS: A total of 323 children were enrolled and 318 were included in the analysis of the persistence of antibody. One year after receipt of whole-virion vaccine, the MN titre was ≥ 1 : 40 in 32.4% of those vaccinated when < 3 years old and in 65.9% of those vaccinated when ≥ 3 years old; the HI titre was ≥ 1 : 32 in 63.2% and 79.1% of children in the respective age groups. One year after receipt of the adjuvanted vaccine, the MN titre was ≥ 1 : 40 in 100% of those vaccinated when < 3 years old and in 96.9% of those vaccinated when ≥ 3 years old; the HI titre was ≥ 1 : 32 in 98.4% and 96.9% of children in the respective age groups. Three hundred and two children were given trivalent seasonal influenza vaccination. Three weeks later, sera were obtained from 282 children; 100% had an MN titre ≥ 1 : 40 and HI titre ≥ 1 : 32. Trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine was well tolerated, although in children < 5 years old, fever ≥ 38 °C was reported in 13.6% of those who had previously received whole-virion vaccine, and in 18.3% of those who had received adjuvanted vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all children who received two doses of AS03B-adjuvanted split-virion pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine had titres of antibody deemed protective (HI titre ≥ 1 : 32, MN titre ≥ 1 : 40) 1 year later. Children who received two doses of whole-virion vaccine had lower titres, although many were above the putative protective thresholds. One year after either pandemic vaccine, the 2010-11 trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine produced a marked serological response to the H1N1 component of the vaccine and was well tolerated. We propose to investigate whether or not previous receipt of monovalent influenza vaccines affected serological response to the H3N2 and B components of the 2010-11 seasonal influenza vaccine, using stored sera. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01239537. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may aid in preoperative treatment planning of endometrial carcinoma by accurately estimating tumor volume, depth of myometrial invasion, and extrauterine extension. Preoperative MR scans were obtained on 24 women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer. MR scans were evaluated for uterine size, as an indirect measure of tumor volume, and depth of myometrial invasion. MR detected deep invasion (greater than or equal to 50% of myometrial thickness) with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 83% (accuracy 79%) when compared with the pathologic findings. MR staging may assist in deciding which patients should have lymph node dissection at surgery and may aid in decisions regarding adjunctive radiation therapy.

Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system.

We compared a new dual-screen, dual-emulsion film system for X-ray mammography with a widely used single-screen, single-emulsion combination for routine contact mammography in 100 patients with a variety of mammographic findings. By using a five-point rating scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent), four blinded readers found the conventional combination superior in density (by 0.46 points on the rating scale), resolution (by 0.64 points), contrast (by 0.46 points), visibility of calcification (by 0.50 points), visibility of soft-tissue masses (by 0.37 points), and overall quality (by 0.47 points). No difference was seen in the graininess of the films. In our study, the conventional system was consistently found to be slightly better than the dual-screen, dual-emulsion combination. The dual-emulsion mammograms required more careful scrutiny, particularly for detection of faint microcalcifications.