An intermittent fasting intervention for Black adults can be feasibly implemented in Black churches: A cluster randomized controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Intensive lifestyle interventions including modest reductions in daily caloric intake (i.e., continuous calorie energy reduction (CER)), are recommended by U.S. national professional health organizations (e.g. American Heart Association). However, they are less effective in Black communities. A burgeoning literature has reported the promise of intermittent fasting (IF) as an alternative strategy for weight loss. However, IF studies have been conducted with predominately White participants and provided participants resources not readily available in real-world situations. OBJECTIVE: Weight loss and weight-related outcomes of a scalable (able to be widely disseminated and implemented) IF intervention developed with and for Black adults were compared to a CER intervention for the purpose of determining IF's feasibility (initial effectiveness, adherence, acceptance) in a Black community. DESIGN: A cluster randomized controlled pilot study was conducted. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: A total of 42 Black adults with a BMI≥25 were recruited from five Black churches (3 IF churches, 2 CER churches) in Western New York State from September 2021 until May 2022. Participants were free of medical conditions that might have contraindicated participation in a weight reduction program and other factors that might affect weight loss. INTERVENTIONS: Community health workers delivered the 6-month, 16-session faith-based IF and CER interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was feasibility, consisting of initial effectiveness on body weight (percent body weight lost from baseline to 6-month follow-up), adherence, and acceptability. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Descriptive statistics and linear mixed models accounting for within-church clustering were used. A baseline covariate corresponding to the outcome variable was included in the model. Intent-to-treat analysis was used. RESULTS: There was statistically significant weight loss within both arms [IF: -3.5 (-6, -0.9)]; [CER: -2.9 (-5.1, -0.8) kg], from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Compared to CER, IF led to significantly lower daily energy intake [414.2 (55.2, 773.2) kcal] and fat intake [16.1 (2.4, 29.8) g]. IF may result in lower fruit and vegetable intake [-103.2 (-200.9, -5.5) g] and fiber intake -5.4 (-8.7, -2) compared to CER. Participants in the IF arm completed 3.8 (1.4) more self-monitoring booklets compared to those in the CER arm (p=0.02). Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSIONS: An IF intervention developed with and for Black adults can be feasibly implemented in Black churches. Larger studies need to be conducted to ascertain the extent IF can serve as a viable weight loss alternative to CER interventions in Black communities.

Advancing community-academic partnerships to achieve breast health equity: Applying the community-based participatory model to build capacity for sustained impact.

BACKGROUND: This formative study leveraged a community-academic partnership to identify barriers to care that are potential sources of breast cancer disparities in Black women. Through this partnership and using a community-based participatory research approach, the objective was to develop a community task force to inform future interventions aimed at addressing breast cancer disparities and increasing health equity. METHODS: The authors assessed gaps in care related to breast cancer in Buffalo, New York, by collecting and analyzing qualitative data from focus groups and interviews with breast cancer survivors and breast navigation groups assessing barriers and facilitators across the cancer care continuum. Then, community-based participatory research approaches were used to build a task force to develop an action plan addressing gaps in care. RESULTS: The authors conducted a thematic analysis of qualitative findings to understand barriers and facilitators to cancer care. Three main domains of themes emerged, including medical mistrust, fear, and stigma; the importance of patient navigation as a form of social support; and the importance of faith and faith-based community. Finally, the findings were presented to a newly formed community task force to validate the data collected and set future priorities to address breast cancer disparities and increase breast health equity in the region. CONCLUSIONS: The authors observed that health equity is a critically important issue in cancer care and that developing culturally tailored interventions has the potential to improve care delivery and reduce breast cancer disparities. Learning from and working with community members helps set the future agenda related to health equity. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Our overall goal was to assess gaps in breast cancer care in Buffalo, New York, and to use community-based participatory approaches to build a task force to work toward breast health equity. Recent and historical data indicate that the Western New York community is facing a continued wide gap in breast cancer mortality trends between Black and White patients. We collected qualitative data to understand potential sources of inequity related to breast cancer and presented findings to a community task force to set future priorities for addressing breast cancer disparities and increasing breast health equity in our region.

Introducing Biospecimen Science to Communities: Tools from Two Cities.

BACKGROUND: This article describes community-engaged processes employed by two Community Network Program Center (CNPC) sites located in Tampa, Florida, and Buffalo, New York, toward the development of Spanish/English educational products about biobanking and biospecimen research. METHODS: Each CNPC carried out a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach that underscored six essential components that moved concepts to a final educational product in a highly participatory fashion. The similar CBPR processes at the two locations focused on the same topic, resulted in different engagement approaches and tools for their respective communities: 1) DVD and brochure toolkit and 2) PowerPoint, group program with audience response system (ARS). RESULTS: We detail a comparison of methods and applications for using these tools among diverse community groups to advance understandings about genetic and biomedical research technologies. CONCLUSION: Ultimately, these tools and associated educational efforts emphasize the critical value of co-learning among academic and community members in biobanking and biospecimen research.