Pharmacokinetic profile of intramuscular fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the pharmacokinetics of a long-acting formulation of fulvestrant following intramuscular administration of single and multiple doses. STUDY DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic investigations of single and multiple doses of fulvestrant were conducted within two global phase III efficacy studies that compared intramuscular fulvestrant with oral anastrozole in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer (study 0020, conducted in Europe, Australia and South Africa, and study 0021, conducted in North America). METHODS: Patients received once-monthly intramuscular injections of fulvestrant 250 mg (1 x 5 mL for < or =21 months in study 0020; 2 x 2.5 mL for < or =30 months in study 0021). Serial blood samples were collected for the first 28 days after the initial dose and immediately prior to all subsequent monthly doses. Plasma fulvestrant concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PATIENTS: Twenty-six (study 0020) and 193 (study 0021) postmenopausal women, comprising the pharmacokinetic subgroups of the phase III efficacy trials, were studied. Patients had shown disease progression or recurrence following previous hormonal therapy for advanced disease or had relapsed after adjuvant endocrine therapy with a nonsteroidal antiestrogen. OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: For single-dose fulvestrant 250 mg, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 28 days (AUC(28)), maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)), minimum observed plasma concentration at 28 days (C(min)) and time to maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) were determined. For multiple-dose fulvestrant 250 mg once monthly, steady-state trough concentrations (C(trough)) were determined. Plasma fulvestrant concentrations reached a peak at a median of 7 days (range 2-8 days) postdose, and declined biexponentially with a slower phase commencing approximately 2-3 weeks postdose. Intersubject variability in C(max) and AUC(28) was approximately 6-fold and 4-fold, respectively. Mean parameters for single-dose fulvestrant were: AUC(28), 148 microg. day/L; C(max), 8.2 microg/L; C(min), 2.6 microg/L; t(max), 7.0 days. Geometric mean C(trough) increased from 2.57 to 6.15 microg/L (study 0020) and from 2.38 to 6.52 microg/L (study 0021) over the first 6 months, reaching steady-state concentrations of approximately 6-7 microg/L (study 0020) or 9 microg/L (study 0021). Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis, using a naive pooled data approach, suggests that observed single- and multiple-dose plasma profiles can be adequately described with a two-compartment kinetic model. Model-generated steady-state AUC(28) values were approximately 300 microg. day/L. CONCLUSIONS: The intramuscular formulation of fulvestrant displays predictable kinetics and approximately 2-fold accumulation on administration once monthly. At the proposed therapeutic dosage (250 mg once monthly), plasma fulvestrant concentrations are maintained within a narrow range throughout the administration interval, thus ensuring stable systemic drug exposure during long-term treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of a single dose of fulvestrant prolonged-release intramuscular injection in postmenopausal women awaiting surgery for primary breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of 3 different single doses of fulvestrant-a new estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that downregulates the ER with no known agonist effects-administered as a prolonged-release IM formulation. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data were obtained in a randomized, partially blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Phase I/II multicenter trial involving postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer (clinical stages T1-T3, with tumors that were ER positive or of unknown ER status) awaiting curative-intent surgery. Patients received either IM fulvestrant (50, 125, or 250 mg), oral tamoxifen (20 mg, once daily), or oral placebo (once daily). Treatment started 2 to 3 weeks before surgery and blood was taken at various times up to 12 weeks after fulvestrant administration to assess pharmacokinetic variables. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients entered the trial, of whom 58 took part in the pharmacokinetic analysis (50 mg, n = 20; 125 mg, n = 16; 250 mg, n = 22). Following single IM injections of fulvestrant, the median time to maximum concentration was 6.98, 6.98, and 6.96 days in the 50-, 125,- and 250-mg dose groups, respectively, with an overall range of 2 to 19 days). The plasma concentration-time profiles were primarily controlled by the rate of absorption from the injection site; post-peak plasma concentrations declined over time and were measurable up to 84 days after administration of fulvestrant 125 and 250 mg. Plasma concentrations at 28 days were 2- to 5-fold lower than the maximum value. Plasma concentration data for the 250-mg dose were best described by a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model, with an apparent terminal phase half-life of approximately 49 days, beginning approximately 3 weeks after administration. Mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve for days 0 through 28 (AUC 0-28) was proportional for fulvestrant 50, 125, and 250 mg. For a doubling of the dose, an analysis of covariance model of the pharmacokinetic data projected an estimated increase in AUC 0-28 of a factor of 1.84 (95% CI, 1.67 to 2.04). CONCLUSIONS: The IM formulation of fulvestrant used in this study had predictable, dose-linear pharmacokinetics. The prolonged-release properties of this formulation suggested that it may be well suited for the once-monthly dosing schedule intended for clinical use.