Premature senescence in human melanocytes after exposure to solar UVR: An exosome and UV-miRNA connection.

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) can play two roles: induce cellular senescence and convert skin melanocytes into melanoma. To assess whether this conversion might rely on melanocytes having to first acquire a senescent phenotype, we studied the effects of physiological doses of UVR (UVA + UVB) on quiescent melanocytes in vitro. Repeated doses of UVR induced these melanocytes into a senescent-like state. Additionally, these cells secrete exosomes with specific miRNAs that differ in quantity from those of the un-irradiated melanocytes. Many of the exosomal miRNAs that were differentially enriched regulated genes comprising a "senescence core signature" and encoding factors of the senescence-messaging secretome (SASP), while a subset of the differentially reduced miRNAs targeted DNA repair genes that have been experimentally shown to be repressed in senescent melanocytes. Thus, the selection of specific miRNAs by exosomes and their release from melanocytes after exposure to UVR have activities in inducing these cells into premature senescence.

The Response of microRNAs to Solar UVR in Skin-Resident Melanocytes Differs between Melanoma Patients and Healthy Persons.

The conversion of melanocytes into cutaneous melanoma is largely dictated by the effects of solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Yet to be described, however, is exactly how these cells are affected by intense solar UVR while residing in their natural microenvironment, and whether their response differs in persons with a history of melanoma when compared to that of healthy individuals. By using laser capture microdissection (LCM) to isolate a pure population of melanocytes from a small area of skin that had been intermittingly exposed or un-exposed to physiological doses of solar UVR, we can now report for the first time that the majority of UV-responsive microRNAs (miRNAs) in the melanocytes of a group of women with a history of melanoma are down-regulated when compared to those in the melanocytes of healthy controls. Among the miRNAs that were commonly and significantly down-regulated in each of these women were miR-193b (P<0.003), miR-342-3p (P<0.003), miR186 (P<0.007), miR-130a (P<0.007), and miR-146a (P<0.007). To identify genes potentially released from inhibition by these repressed UV-miRNAs, we analyzed databases (e.g., DIANA-TarBase) containing experimentally validated microRNA-gene interactions. In the end, this enabled us to construct UV-miRNA-gene regulatory networks consisting of individual genes with a probable gain-of-function being intersected not by one, but by several down-regulated UV-miRNAs. Most striking, however, was that these networks typified well-known regulatory modules involved in controlling the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and processes associated with the regulation of immune-evasion. We speculate that these pathways become activated by UVR resulting in miRNA down regulation only in melanocytes susceptible to melanoma, and that these changes could be partially responsible for empowering these cells toward tumor progression.

The dynamics of E1A in regulating networks and canonical pathways in quiescent cells.

BACKGROUND: Adenoviruses force quiescent cells to re-enter the cell cycle to replicate their DNA, and for the most part, this is accomplished after they express the E1A protein immediately after infection. In this context, E1A is believed to inactivate cellular proteins (e.g., p130) that are known to be involved in the silencing of E2F-dependent genes that are required for cell cycle entry. However, the potential perturbation of these types of genes by E1A relative to their functions in regulatory networks and canonical pathways remains poorly understood. FINDINGS: We have used DNA microarrays analyzed with Bayesian ANOVA for microarray (BAM) to assess changes in gene expression after E1A alone was introduced into quiescent cells from a regulated promoter. Approximately 2,401 genes were significantly modulated by E1A, and of these, 385 and 1033 met the criteria for generating networks and functional and canonical pathway analysis respectively, as determined by using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. After focusing on the highest-ranking cellular processes and regulatory networks that were responsive to E1A in quiescent cells, we observed that many of the up-regulated genes were associated with DNA replication, the cell cycle and cellular compromise. We also identified a cadre of up regulated genes with no previous connection to E1A; including genes that encode components of global DNA repair systems and DNA damage checkpoints. Among the down-regulated genes, we found that many were involved in cell signalling, cell movement, and cellular proliferation. Remarkably, a subset of these was also associated with p53-independent apoptosis, and the putative suppression of this pathway may be necessary in the viral life cycle until sufficient progeny have been produced. CONCLUSIONS: These studies have identified for the first time a large number of genes that are relevant to E1A's activities in promoting quiescent cells to re-enter the cell cycle in order to create an optimum environment for adenoviral replication.

Activation of Cdc6 by MyoD is associated with the expansion of quiescent myogenic satellite cells.

MyoD is a transcriptional factor that is required for the differentiation of muscle stem cells (satellite cells). In this study, we describe a previously unknown function for MyoD in regulating a gene (Cdc6) that is vital to endowing chromatin with the capability of replicating DNA. In C2C12 and primary mouse myoblasts, we show that MyoD can occupy an E-box within the promoter of Cdc6 and that this association, along with E2F3a, is required for its activity. MyoD and Cdc6 are both expressed after quiescent C2C12 myoblasts or satellite cells in association with myofibers are stimulated for growth, but MyoD appears at least 2-3 h earlier than Cdc6. Finally, knockdown of MyoD impairs the ability of C2C12 cells to express Cdc6 after leaving quiescence, and as a result, they cannot fully progress into S phase. Our results define a mechanism by which MyoD helps myogenic satellite cells to enter into the first round of DNA replication after transitioning out of quiescence.

E1A interacts with two opposing transcriptional pathways to induce quiescent cells into S phase.

Despite data suggesting that the adenovirus E1A protein of 243 amino acids creates an S-phase environment in quiescent cells by overcoming the nucleosomal repression of E2F-regulated genes, the precise mechanisms underlying E1A's ability in this process have not yet been defined at the biochemical level. In this study, we show by kinetic analysis that E1A, as opposed to an E1A mutant failing to bind p130, can temporally eliminate corepressor complexes consisting of p130-E2F4 and HDAC1/2-mSin3B from the promoters of E2F-regulated genes in quiescent cells. Once the complexes are removed, the di-methylation of H3K9 at these promoters becomes dramatically diminished, and this in turn allows for the acetylation of H3K9/14 and the recruitment of activating E2F family members, which is then followed by the transcriptional activity of the E2F-regulated genes. Remarkably, although an E1A mutant that can no longer bind to a histone acetyltransferase (PCAF) is as capable as wild-type E1A in eliminating corepressor complexes and methyl groups from the promoters of these genes, it cannot mediate the acetylation of H3K9/14 or induce their transcription. These findings suggest that corepressors as well as coactivators are acted upon by E1A to derepress E2F-regulated genes in quiescent cells. Thus, our results highlight for the first time a functional relationship between E1A and two transcriptional pathways of differing functions for transitioning cells out of quiescence and into S phase.

A viral mechanism for remodeling chromatin structure in G0 cells.

Small DNA viruses force quiescent cells to reenter the cell cycle in order to replicate their DNA. We report here that the adenovirus E1A protein creates an S phase environment in quiescent cells by overcoming the nucleosomal repression of E2F-targeted genes. These genes are surrounded by Lys-9-methylated H3 histones, and their promoters are occupied by the pRb-related protein p130 and the inhibitory transcription factor E2F4. Kinetic analysis indicates that E1A binds to E2F promoters where it eliminates p130 and E2F4, resulting in the dramatic elimination of H3 Lys-9 methylation. Thereafter, H3 Lys-9 acetylation occurs along with the recruitment of activating E2F family members, and this is followed by the transcriptional activity of E2F-targeted genes. These results indicate that E1A has a role in reconfiguring chromatin structure and that this activity is necessary to overcome the repressive mechanisms that maintain cells in a quiescent state.

MyoD is functionally linked to the silencing of a muscle-specific regulatory gene prior to skeletal myogenesis.

Most of the genes that are central to the process of skeletal muscle differentiation remain in a transcriptionally silent or "off" state until muscle cells (myoblasts) are induced to differentiate. Although the mechanisms that contribute to this phenomenon are still unclear, it is likely that histone deacetylases (HDACs), which play an important role in the repression of genes, are principally involved. Recent studies indicate that the initiator of the myogenic program, namely MyoD, can associate with the deacetylase HDAC1 in vivo, and because HDACs are usually recruited to promoters by specific proteins, we considered the possibility that these two proteins might be acting together at the promoters of muscle-specific genes to repress their transcription in myoblasts. In this work, we show by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays that MyoD and HDAC1 are both occupying the promoter of myogenin and that this gene is in a region of repressed chromatin, as revealed by enrichment in histone H3 lysine 9 (Lys-9) methylation and the underacetylation of histones. Surprisingly, after the myoblasts are induced to differentiate, the promoter becomes absent of HDAC1, and eventually the acetyltransferase P/CAF takes it place alongside MyoD. In addition, enrichment of histone H3 acetylation (Lys-9/14) and phosphorylation of Ser-10 can now be observed at the myogenin promoter. These data strongly suggest that in addition to its widely accepted role as an activator of differentiation-specific genes, MyoD also can perform as a transcriptional repressor in proliferating myoblasts while in partnership with a HDAC.