RESUMO
Background: Expressed breast milk (EBM) protein content is highly variable between mothers and often below published values that are still used for EBM protein fortification strategies. This approach may result in significant protein deficit and suboptimal protein energy (P/E) ratio. The study aim was to determine whether individualized EBM protein analysis and fortification will reduce preterm infant protein deficits and improve growth and neurodevelopmental outcome. Study Methods: In a single-center randomized, blinded study of infants born at 24 0/7-29 6/7 weeks, mother-specific protein values measured by a milk analyzer were used to individualize infant-specific protein intake (interventional group, IG), and compared this to a standardized protein fortification scheme based on published values of EBM protein content of 1.4 g/dL (control group, CG). For IG, milk analyzer protein values of mother's EBM were used to adjust protein content of the EBM. The CG EBM protein content was adjusted using the standard published value of 1.4 g/dL and not based on milk analyzer values. EBM protein content, protein intake, protein/energy (P/E) ratio, weight (WT), head circumference (HC), length (L), growth velocity (GV) from 2 to 6 weeks of age, WT, HC and L Z-Scores at 32- and 35-weeks PMA, and lean body mass (35 weeks PMA skin fold thickness) were measured. Neurodevelopment was assessed by Bayley III at average 24 months corrected gestational age (CGA). Results: EBM protein content before fortification was significantly below published values of 1.4 g/dL at all time points in both CG and IG. CG protein deficit was significantly decreased and progressively worsened throughout the study. Individualized protein fortification in IG avoided protein deficit and optimized P/E ratio. Although no significant change in short-term GV (at 6 weeks of age) was seen between groups, IG infants born at <27 weeks had significant improvements in WT and L z-scores, and leaner body mass at 32 and 35 weeks PMA. IG exhibited significantly improved cognitive scores at 24 months CGA. Conclusions: Infant-specific protein supplementation of mother's EBM optimized P/E ratio by eliminating protein deficit and improved growth z scores at 32- and 35-weeks PMA and neurocognitive testing at 24 months.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate salivary biomarkers that elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which in utero opioid exposure exerts sex-specific effects on select hypothalamic and reward genes driving hyperphagia, a hallmark symptom of infants suffering from neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively collected saliva from 50 newborns born at ≥34 weeks of gestational age with prenatal opioid exposure and 50 sex- and gestational age-matched infants without exposure. Saliva underwent transcriptomic analysis for 4 select genes involved in homeostatic and hedonic feeding regulation (neuropeptide Y2 receptor [NPY2R], proopiomelanocortin [POMC], leptin receptor [LEPR], dopamine type 2 receptor [DRD2]). Normalized gene expression data were stratified based on sex and correlated with feeding volume on day of life 7 and length of stay in infants with NOWS requiring pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Expression of DRD2, a hedonistic/reward regulator, was significantly higher in male newborns compared with female newborns with NOWS (Δ threshold cycle 10.8 ± 3.8 vs 13.9 ± 3.7, P = .01). In NOWS requiring pharmacotherapy expression of leptin receptor, an appetite suppressor, was higher in male subjects than female subjects (Δ threshold cycle 8.4 ± 2.5 vs 12.4 ± 5.1, P = .05), DRD2 expression significantly correlated with intake volume on day of life 7 (r = 0.58, P = .02), and expression of NPY2R, an appetite regulator, negatively correlated with length of stay (r = -0.24, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal opioid exposure exerts sex-dependent effects on hypothalamic feeding regulatory genes with clinical correlations. Neonatal salivary gene expression analyses may predict hyperphagia, severity of withdrawal state, and length of stay in infants with NOWS.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Expressão Gênica , Hiperfagia/etiologia , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/genética , Saliva/química , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/complicações , Projetos Piloto , Pró-Opiomelanocortina/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , Receptores de Dopamina D2/genética , Receptores para Leptina/genética , Receptores de Neuropeptídeo Y/genética , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare length of hospital stay (LOS), LOS due to neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), and duration of pharmacologic treatment in community or academic settings. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred-two infants exposed to opioids in utero at two community hospitals were compared to 256 from eight academic centers. All infants were managed with non-pharmacologic care followed by similar pharmacologic treatment options. RESULTS: Two hundred-twelve infants received pharmacologic treatment for NAS. Mean LOS (24.7 ± 8.5 vs. 24.5 ± 11.3 days), LOS due to NAS (24.0 ± 8.2 vs. 23.3 ± 9.2 days), and duration of NAS treatment (19.3 ± 8.0 vs. 18.9 ± 9.2 days) were similar in community compared to academic medical centers. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found in infants managed in the community compared to academic care settings. These findings support caring for opioid-exposed infants in both community and academic settings with the use of standardized care protocols.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Hospitais Comunitários/organização & administração , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/tratamento farmacológico , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Importance: Although opioids are used to treat neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), the best pharmacologic treatment has not been established. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of methadone and morphine in NAS. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized, double-blind, intention-to-treat trial, term infants from 8 US newborn units whose mothers received buprenorphine, methadone, or opioids for pain control during pregnancy were eligible. A total of 117 infants were randomized to receive methadone or morphine from February 9, 2014, to March 6, 2017. Mothers who declined randomization could consent to data collection and standard institutional treatment. Interventions: Infants were assessed with the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System every 4 hours and treated with methadone or placebo every 4 hours or morphine every 4 hours. Infants with persistently elevated Finnegan scores received dose increases. Infants who exceeded a predetermined opioid dose received phenobarbital. Dose reductions occurred every 12 to 48 hours when signs of NAS were controlled with therapy, stopping at 20% of the original dose. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was length of hospital stay (LOS). The secondary end points were LOS attributable to NAS and length of drug treatment (LOT). Results: A total of 183 mothers consented to have their infants in the study; 117 infants required treatment. Because 1 parent withdrew consent, data were analyzed on 116 infants (mean [SD] gestational age, 39.1 [1.1] weeks; mean [SD] birth weight, 3157 [486] g; 58 [50%] male). Demographic variables and risk factors were similar except for more prenatal cigarette exposure in infants who received methadone. Adjusting for study site and maternal opioid type, methadone was associated with decreased mean number of days for LOS by 14% (relative number of days, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-1.00; P = .046), corresponding to a difference of 2.9 days; 14% reduction in LOS attributable to NAS (relative number of days, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96; P = .01), corresponding to a difference of 2.7 days; and 16% reduction in LOT (relative number of days, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97; P = .02), corresponding to a difference of 2.3 days. Methadone was also associated with reduced median LOS (16 vs 20 days, P = .005), LOS attributable to NAS (16 vs 19 days, P = .005), and LOT (11.5 vs 15 days, P = .009). Study infants had better short-term outcomes than 170 nonrandomized infants treated with morphine per standard institutional protocols. Conclusions and Relevance: With use of weight- and sign-based treatment for NAS, short-term outcomes were better in infants receiving methadone compared with morphine. Assessment of longer-term outcomes is ongoing. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01958476.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Metadona/efeitos adversos , Morfina/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) caused by in utero opioid exposure is a growing problem; genetic factors influencing the incidence and severity have not been previously examined. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the µ-opioid receptor (OPRM1), multidrug resistance (ABCB1), and catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) genes are associated with risk for opioid addiction in adults. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether SNPs in the OPRM1, ABCB1, and COMT genes are associated with length of hospital stay and the need for treatment of NAS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective multicenter cohort study conducted at 5 tertiary care centers and community hospitals in Massachusetts and Maine between July 2011 and July 2012. DNA samples were genotyped for SNPs, and then NAS outcomes were correlated with genotype. Eighty-six of 140 eligible mother-infant dyads were enrolled. Infants were eligible if they were 36 weeks' gestational age or older and exposed to methadone or buprenorphine in utero . MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was length of hospital stay, with between-group differences expressed as ß and calculated with linear regression models. Secondary outcome measures included need for any medical treatment for NAS and treatment with 2 or more medications. RESULTS: Infants with the OPRM1 118A>G AG/GG genotype had shortened length of stay (ß = -8.5 days; 95% CI, -14.9 to -2.1 days; P = .009) and were less likely to receive any treatment than AA infants (48% vs 72%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96; P = .006). The COMT 158A>G AG/GG genotype was associated with shortened length of stay (ß = -10.8 days; 95% CI, -18.2 to -3.4 days; P = .005) and less treatment with 2 or more medications (18% vs 56%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.86; P = .001) than the AA genotype. Associations with the ABCB1 SNPs were not significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among infants with NAS, variants in the OPRM1 and COMT genes were associated with a shorter length of hospital stay and less need for treatment. These preliminary findings may provide insight into the mechanisms underlying NAS.
Assuntos
Catecol O-Metiltransferase/genética , Tempo de Internação , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/genética , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/terapia , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Receptores Opioides mu/genética , Subfamília B de Transportador de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP , Membro 1 da Subfamília B de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP/genética , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Hospitais Comunitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Gravidez , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Regressão , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine gestational age-specific risks of intervening to "rescue" a compromised fetus in triplet pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed retrospectively triplet pregnancies managed at New England Medical Center (July 1992-May 2000; n=97 pregnancies). For each week in gestation, we compared the chance of at least one of three infants developing complications of prematurity in Scenario A (delivery at that gestation to rescue the jeopardized fetus) with the chance of at least one of two infants from Scenario B (allowing the jeopardized fetus to die in utero to prolong pregnancy) developing that complication later in gestation. RESULTS: We observed a decreased risk of at least one infant developing a specific complication in Scenario B than in Scenario A for all complications studied. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of triplet outcomes with the two surviving older newborns identifies important changes in risk between 25 and 32 weeks. These data enable physicians and parents to weigh acceptable risks with benefits.