Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 373, 2016 08 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27495917

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinicians frequently prescribe antibiotics inappropriately for acute respiratory infections (ARIs). Our objective was to test information technology-enabled behavioral interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for ARIs in a randomized controlled pilot test trial. METHODS: Primary care clinicians were randomized in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment with 3 interventions: 1) Accountable Justifications; 2) Suggested Alternatives; and 3) Peer Comparison. Beforehand, participants completed an educational module. Measures included: rates of antibiotic prescribing for: non-antibiotic-appropriate ARI diagnoses, acute sinusitis/pharyngitis, all other diagnoses/symptoms of respiratory infection, and all three ARI categories combined. RESULTS: We examined 3,276 visits in the pre-intervention year and 3,099 in the intervention year. The antibiotic prescribing rate fell for non-antibiotic-appropriate ARIs (24.7 % in the pre-intervention year to 5.2 % in the intervention year); sinusitis/pharyngitis (50.3 to 44.7 %); all other diagnoses/symptoms of respiratory infection (40.2 to 25.3 %); and all categories combined (38.7 to 24.2 %; all p < 0.001). There were no significant relationships between any intervention and antibiotic prescribing for non-antibiotic-appropriate ARI diagnoses or sinusitis/pharyngitis. Suggested Alternatives was associated with reduced antibiotic prescribing for other diagnoses or symptoms of respiratory infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.89) and for all ARI categories combined (OR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.54-0.96). Peer Comparison was associated with reduced prescribing for all ARI categories combined (OR, 0.73; 95 % CI, 0.53-0.995). CONCLUSIONS: We observed large reductions in antibiotic prescribing regardless of whether or not study participants received an intervention, suggesting an overriding Hawthorne effect or possibly clinician-to-clinician contamination. Low baseline inappropriate prescribing may have led to floor effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01454960 .


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Comportamento , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Padrões de Prática Médica , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Tomada de Decisões , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Feminino , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Interprofissionais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Médicos de Atenção Primária/educação , Médicos de Atenção Primária/psicologia , Médicos de Atenção Primária/normas , Projetos Piloto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições/normas , Prescrições/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...