Allocation changes in heart transplantation: What has really changed?

OBJECTIVE: In 2018, the heart allocation system changed status classifications and broadened geographic distribution. We examined this change at a national level based on the immediate pre- and postchange periods. METHODS: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database, we identified all adult primary, isolated heart transplants from October 18, 2017, to October 17, 2019. Two time periods were compared: (1) October 18, 2017, to October 17, 2018 (pre); and (2) October 18, 2018, to October 17, 2019 (post). Comparisons were made between groups, and a multivariable logistic regression model was created to identify factors associated with pretransplant temporary mechanical circulatory support. Volume analysis at the regional, state, and center level was also conducted as the primary focus. RESULTS: A total of 5381 independent heart transplants were identified within the time frame. On unadjusted analysis, there was a significant increase in temporary mechanical circulatory support (pre, 11.1%; post, 36.2%, P < .01) and decrease in waitlist days (pre, 93 days; post, 41 days; P < .01). Distance traveled (nautical miles) (pre, 83; post, 225; P < .01) and ischemic time (hours) (pre, 3.0; post, 3.4; P < .01) were significantly increased. On multivariable analysis, the postallocation time period was independently associated with temporary MCS (odds ratio, 4.463; 95% confidence interval, 3.844-5.183; P < .001). Transplant volumes did not significantly change after the allocation change at a regional, state, and center level. CONCLUSIONS: Since the planned alteration to the allocation system, there have been changes in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support as well as distance and ischemic time associated with transplant, but no significant volume changes were observed. Continued observation of outcomes and volume under the new allocation system will be necessary in the upcoming years.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Severe secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with poor prognosis in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Few observational and randomized controlled studies demonstrated the efficacy of transcatheter mitral valve repair in heart failure patients with significant MR. A meta-analysis of published studies was performed to evaluate the role of transcatheter mitral valve repair using the MitraClip device in heart failure patients with significant secondary MR. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochran CENTRAL, and Embase databases using the search terms "percutaneous mitral valve repair" or "transcatheter mitral valve repair" and "heart failure." Studies that compared medical therapy plus transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip to medical therapy alone in heart failure patients with significant secondary MR were included for pooled analysis. A random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Four studies, 2 randomized controlled and 2 nonrandomized studies met the criteria for analysis. Pooled analysis included a total of 1,421 patients, of which 746 patients underwent transcatheter mitral valve repair and 675 patients received medical therapy alone. When compared to medical therapy, transcatheter mitral valve repair significantly decreased all-cause mortality (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91; p = 0.02). A trend toward significant reduction in rehospitalizations (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.00; p = 0.05) was also observed. Periprocedural complications ranged from 7.5 to 12.6%. CONCLUSION: Evidence from pooled analysis suggests that transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip on top of medical therapy, in appropriately selected symptomatic heart failure patients with significant secondary MR, provides survival benefit and may decrease hospitalizations when compared with guideline-directed medical therapy alone.

Management of COVID-19 in a durable left ventricular assist device recipient: A continuity of care perspective.

COVID-19 is impacting the cardiovascular community both here in the United States and globally. The rapidly emerging cardiac complications have heightened implications for those with underlying cardiovascular disease. We describe an early case of COVID-19 in a left ventricular assist device recipient in the United States. We discuss our clinical management during the initial admission, outpatient management, and a unique complication of this disease over a 40-day disease course.

Impact of Change in Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Obese Patients.

Obesity could be a risk factor portending a poor prognosis after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We sought to determine the impact of change in body mass index (BMI) on outcomes in obese patients supported by LVAD. Fifty-nine patients, who received LVAD between January 2010 and June 2015, with BMI ≥30 kg/m at the time of LVAD implantation, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based upon whether BMI after 6 months of device support decreased when compared with before. Thirty-eight patients who experienced decrease in BMI (group D) were compared with 21 patients whose BMI increased (group I). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except for body weight and BMI, which were significantly higher in group D (BMI: 35.9 ± 4.0 kg/m vs. 33.4 ± 3.5 kg/m; p = 0.018). During mean follow-up of 560 ± 178 days, group I had significantly higher incidence of infection [events per patient-years (eppy): nondevice related: 0.18 vs. 0.35, p = 0.01; device related: 0.1 vs. 0.32, p < 0.01; sepsis: 0.1 vs. 0.32, p < 0.01], heart failure (eppy: 0.1 vs. 0.25, p < 0.01), and renal failure (eppy: 0.03 vs. 0.14, p < 0.01). Survival at 2 years was significantly lower in group I (84.8% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.025). Increase in BMI in obese patients on LVAD is associated with worse survival with a higher incidence of infection, heart failure, and renal failure. Weight control may be a modifiable factor to improve prognosis.

Successful heart transplantation using a donor heart afflicted by takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, also known as apical ballooning syndrome, stress cardiomyopathy, or broken heart syndrome, is a disease characterized by transient ventricular dysfunction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Herein, we present a case in which a heart with mild takotsubo cardiomyopathy was utilized as the donor organ for an orthotopic heart transplant.

The impact of insurance and socioeconomic status on outcomes for patients with left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: There has been a steady increase of patients living in the community with Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs). There is a significant gap in our fund of knowledge with respect to the impact that insurance and socioeconomic status has on outcomes for LVAD patients. We thus hypothesize that low neighborhood socioeconomic status and receipt of Medicaid, respectively, lead to earlier readmissions, earlier death, as well as longer time to transplantation among LVAD patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 101 patients using existing data in the medical information warehouse database at The Ohio State University Medical Center. Primary outcomes measured included time to first event (first readmission or death), death, and time to rehospitalization. Our secondary outcome of interest included time from LVAD implantation to cardiac transplantation. RESULTS: Recipients of Medicaid did not have an increased risk of adverse events compared with patients without Medicaid coverage. Low Median Household Income (MHI) was associated with an increased risk of readmission (log-rank P = 0.0069) and time to first event (log-rank P = 0.0088). Bridge to transplantation was the only independent predictor of time to death (Hazard Ratio 2.1, [95% confidence interval = 1.03-4.37]). Low MHI and a history of atherosclerosis were both significant predictors for readmission and time to first event. Aldosterone antagonist use decreased the risk of readmission or time to first event by 46%. CONCLUSIONS: LVAD recipients with a low MHI were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital after LVAD implantation. Whether these patients are adequately monitored on an outpatient basis remains unclear.

Percutaneous left ventricular partitioning in patients with chronic heart failure and a prior anterior myocardial infarction: Results of the PercutAneous Ventricular RestorAtion in Chronic Heart failUre PaTiEnts Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of a novel percutaneous left ventricular partitioning device (VPD) in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and a prior anterior myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Anterior myocardial infarction is frequently followed by left ventricular remodeling, HF, and increased long-term morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in a multinational, nonrandomized, longitudinal investigation. The primary end point was an assessment of safety, defined as the successful delivery and deployment of the VPD and absence of device-related major adverse cardiac events over 6 months. Secondary (exploratory) efficacy end points included changes in hemodynamics and functional status and were assessed serially throughout the study. RESULTS: Ventricular partitioning device placement was not attempted in 5 (13%) of 39 subjects. The device was safely and successfully implanted in 31 (91%) of the remaining 34 patients or 79% of all enrolled patients. The 6-month rate of device-related major adverse cardiac event occurred in 5 (13%) of 39 enrolled subjects and 5 (15%) of 34 treated subjects, with 1 additional event occurring between 6 and 12 months. For patients discharged with the device to 12 months (n = 28), New York Heart Association class (2.5 ± 0.6 to 1.3 ± 0.6, P < .001) and quality-of-life scores (38.6 ± 6.1 to 28.4 ± 4.4, P < .002) improved significantly; however, the 6-minute hall walk distance (358.5 ± 20.4 m to 374.7 ± 25.6 m, P nonsignificant) only trended toward improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The left VPD appears to be relatively safe and potentially effective in the treatment for patients with HF and a prior anterior myocardial infarction. However, these limited results suggest the need for further evaluation in a larger randomized controlled trial.