The Journey patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: A minimum 5year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: The Journey patellofemoral joint arthroplasty (PFA) was designed to improve patient outcomes following surgical management of patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis. It is based on the asymmetric trochlear geometry of the Genesis II total knee arthroplasty, with Oxinium components, to provide a reliable treatment option in an often young, high demand group of patients. METHODS: We report the minimum five year functional outcome and survivorship of the Journey PFA performed at our institution between October 2005 and September 2009. RESULTS: A total of 101 Journey PFAs were implanted in 83 patients, and we have complete outcomes for 90 implants (89%). There were 80 implants in female patients, and the mean age at time of surgery was 60years (26 to 86). The median Oxford Knee Score (0 to 48) improved from 18 to 30, and median Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Short Form Index (0 to 60) improved from 22 to 35. There were a total of 12 revisions, with mean time to revision 50months (10 to 99). CONCLUSIONS: The Journey PFA gives a good medium-term functional outcome with 88% survivorship at a mean of seven years. This is the largest study of Journey PFA in the literature, and it provides a reliable option for patients with isolated patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis when arthroplasty is considered.

The Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio.

INTRODUCTION: Posterior Condylar Offset is an area of interest in knee arthroplasty research and clinical outcome. The aim of the study is to define a quantifiable Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio, a normal value for this ratio and to confirm its reproducibility on pre-operative radiographs. METHOD: We propose a new Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio which is defined as the maximal thickness of the posterior condyle projecting posteriorly to a straight line drawn as the extension of the posterior femoral shaft cortex, divided by the maximal thickness of the posterior condyle projecting posterior to a straight line drawn as the extension of the anterior femoral shaft cortex on a true lateral radiograph of the distal quarter of the femur. We have measured this on 100 true lateral radiographs (50 females, 50 males, and mean age 65 years). RESULTS: The mean ratio was 0.44 (SD 0.02) and was shown to have good reproducibility (intra-observer error 0.899 and inter-observer error 0.882. The ratio was also very consistent between male and female patients (0.44 (SD 0.02) for the males and 0.45 (SD 0.02) for the females). Adjusting the ratio for reported posterior condyle articular cartilage thickness increased the ratio to 0.47 (SD 0.02). CONCLUSION: We suggest our Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio is a useful tool to aid further research in this area of knee arthroplasty and propose a normal value of 0.44 on radiographs and 0.47 on post-operative knee arthroplasty radiographs.