Beyond Metabolism: Role of the Immune System in Hepatic Toxicity.

The liver is primarily thought of as a metabolic organ; however, the liver is also an important mediator of immunological functions. Key perspectives on this emerging topic were presented in a symposium at the 2018 annual meeting of the American College of Toxicology entitled "Beyond metabolism: Role of the immune system in hepatic toxicity." Viral hepatitis is an important disease of the liver for which insufficient preventive vaccines exist. Host immune responses inadequately clear these viruses and often potentiate immunological inflammation that damages the liver. In addition, the liver is a key innate immune organ against bacterial infection. Hepatocytes and immune cells cooperatively control systemic and local bacterial infections. Conversely, bacterial infection can activate multiple types of immune cells and pathways to cause hepatocyte damage and liver injury. Finally, the immune system and specifically cytokines and drugs can interact in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. This rare disease can result in a disease spectrum that ranges from mild to acute liver failure. The immune system plays a role in this disease spectrum.

Predictivity/Translatability of Toxicities Observed in Nonclinical Toxicology Studies to Clinical Safety Outcomes in Drug Development: Case Examples.

Nonclinical toxicology studies are conducted to characterize the potential toxicities and establish a safe starting dose for new drugs in clinical studies, but the question remains as to how predictable/translatable the nonclinical safety findings are to humans. In many cases, there is good concordance between nonclinical species and patients. However, there are cases for which there is a lack of predictivity or translatability that led to early termination of clinical studies due to unanticipated toxicities or early termination of programs before making it to the clinic due to unacceptable nonclinical toxicities assumed to be translatable. A few case examples of safety findings that are translatable versus safety findings that are not translatable and why they are not translateable were presented as a symposium at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American College of Toxicology in Palm Springs, California, and are discussed in this article.

Immunotoxicology: A Brief History.

Immunotoxicological research and testing have evolved from early studies of anaphylaxis to the robust and diverse field of immunotoxicology as we know it today. Early studies connecting immune dysfunction with exposure to exogenous agents focused on adverse reactions to immunogenic agents present in vaccines. Over time, work done by immunologists and pathologists leads to descriptions of characteristics of immunogenic agents as well as mechanisms by which anaphylaxis occurs and an understanding of the concept of immunosuppression. These myriad achievements greatly improved public health and led the field of immunotoxicology, which addresses all aspects of adverse immunological responses following exposure to exogenous agents as well as the development of testing paradigms to understand immunological responses of designed agents such as drugs and biologics.

Metabolic Syndrome and Associated Diseases: From the Bench to the Clinic.

Metabolic Syndrome and Associated Diseases: From the Bench to the Clinic, a Society of Toxicology Contemporary Concepts in Toxicology (CCT) workshop was held on March 11, 2017. The meeting was convened to raise awareness of metabolic syndrome and its associated diseases and serve as a melting pot with scientists of multiple disciplines (eg, toxicologists, clinicians, regulators) so as to spur research and understanding of this condition. The criteria for metabolic syndrome include obesity, dyslipidemia (low high-density lipoprotein and/or elevated triglycerides), elevated blood pressure, and alterations in glucose metabolism. It can lead to a greater potential of type 2 diabetes, lipid disorders, cardiovascular disease, hepatic steatosis, and other circulatory disorders. Although there are no approved drugs specifically for this syndrome, many drugs target diseases associated with this syndrome thus potentially increasing the likelihood of drug-drug interactions. There is currently significant research focusing on understanding the key pathways that control metabolism, which would be likely targets of risk factors (eg, exposure to xenobiotics, genetics) and lifestyle factors (eg, microbiome, nutrition, and exercise) that contribute to metabolic syndrome. Understanding these pathways could also lead to the development of pharmaceutical interventions. As individuals with metabolic syndrome have signs similar to that of toxic responses (eg, oxidative stress and inflammation) and organ dysfunction, these alterations should be taken into account in drug development. With the increasing frequency of metabolic syndrome in the general population, the idea of a "normal" individual may need to be redefined. This paper reports on the substance and outcomes of this workshop.

FutureTox II: in vitro data and in silico models for predictive toxicology.

FutureTox II, a Society of Toxicology Contemporary Concepts in Toxicology workshop, was held in January, 2014. The meeting goals were to review and discuss the state of the science in toxicology in the context of implementing the NRC 21st century vision of predicting in vivo responses from in vitro and in silico data, and to define the goals for the future. Presentations and discussions were held on priority concerns such as predicting and modeling of metabolism, cell growth and differentiation, effects on sensitive subpopulations, and integrating data into risk assessment. Emerging trends in technologies such as stem cell-derived human cells, 3D organotypic culture models, mathematical modeling of cellular processes and morphogenesis, adverse outcome pathway development, and high-content imaging of in vivo systems were discussed. Although advances in moving towards an in vitro/in silico based risk assessment paradigm were apparent, knowledge gaps in these areas and limitations of technologies were identified. Specific recommendations were made for future directions and research needs in the areas of hepatotoxicity, cancer prediction, developmental toxicity, and regulatory toxicology.

Workshop proceedings: challenges and opportunities in evaluating protein allergenicity across biotechnology industries.

A workshop entitled "Challenges and Opportunities in Evaluating Protein Allergenicity across Biotechnology Industries" was held at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology (SOT) in San Francisco, California. The workshop was sponsored by the Biotechnology Specialty Section of SOT and was designed to present the science-based approaches used in biotechnology industries to evaluate and regulate protein allergenicity. A panel of experts from industry and government highlighted the allergenicity testing requirements and research in the agricultural, pharmaceutical/biopharma, and vaccine biotechnology industries and addressed challenges and opportunities for advancing the science of protein allergenicity. The main learning from the workshop was that immunoglobulin E-mediated allergenicity of biotechnology-derived products is difficult to assess without human data. The approaches currently being used to evaluate potential for allergenicity across biotechnology industries are very different and range from bioinformatics, in vitro serology, in vivo animal testing, in vitro and in vivo functional assays, and "biosimilar" assessments (ie, biotherapeutic equivalents to innovator products). The challenge remains with regard to the different or lack of regulatory requirements for allergenicity testing across industries, but the novel approaches being used with bioinformatics and biosimilars may lead to opportunities in the future to collaborate across biotechnology industries.

Summary of a workshop on nonclinical and clinical immunotoxicity assessment of immunomodulatory drugs.

The number of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory drugs being developed in the pharmaceutical industry has increased considerably in the past decade. This increase in research and development has been paralleled by questions from both regulatory agencies and industry on how best to assess decreased host resistance to infections or adverse immunostimulation caused by immunomodulatory agents such as anti-cytokine antibodies (e.g., the tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors), anti-adhesion molecule antibodies (e.g., anti-alpha-4 integrin inhibitors) and immunostimulatory molecules (e.g., anti-CD28 antibodies). Although several methods have been developed for nonclinical assessment of immunotoxicity, highly publicized adverse events have brought to light significant gaps in the application of nonclinical immunotoxicity testing in assessing potential risk in humans. Confounding this problem is inconsistent application of immunotoxicology methods for risk assessment within the scientific community, limited understanding of appropriate immunotoxicity testing strategy for immunomodulators and inconsistent testing requests by regulatory agencies. To address these concerns, The Immunotoxicology Technical Committee (ITC) of the International Life Science Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) organized a workshop on Immunomodulators and Clinical Immunotoxicology in May 2007. The Workshop was convened to identify key gaps in nonclinical and clinical immunotoxicity testing of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory agents and to begin to develop consistent approaches for immunotoxicity testing and risk assessment. This paper summarizes the outcome of the HESI ITC Immunomodulators and Clinical Immunotoxicology Workshop. Topics not discussed at the Workshop were outside the scope of this report. Although more work is needed to develop consistent approaches for immunotoxicity assessment of immunomodulators, this Workshop provided the foundation for future discussion.

What's so special about the developing immune system?

The evolution of the subdiscipline of developmental immunotoxicology (DIT) as it exists today has been shaped by significant regulatory pressures as well as key scientific advances. This review considers the role played by legislation to protect children's health, and on the emergence of immunotoxcity and developmental immunotoxicity guidelines, as well as providing some context to the need for special attention on DIT by considering the evidence that the developing immune system may have unique susceptibilities when compared to the adult immune system. Understanding the full extent of this potential has been complicated by a paucity of data detailing the development of the immune system during critical life stages as well as by the complexities of comparisons across species. Notably, there are differences between humans and nonhuman species used in toxicity testing that include specific differences relative to the timing of the development of the immune system as well as more general anatomic differences, and these differences must be factored into the interpretation of DIT studies. Likewise, understanding how the timing of the immune development impacts on various immune parameters is critical to the design of DIT studies, parameters most extensively characterized to date in young adult animals. Other factors important to DIT, which are considered in this review, are the recognition that effects other than suppression (e.g., allergy and autoimmunity) are important; the need to improve our understanding of how to assess the potential for DIT in humans; and the role that pathology has played in DIT studies in test animals. The latter point receives special emphasis in this review because pathology evaluations have been a major component of standard nonclinical toxicology studies, and could serve an important role in studies to evaluate DIT. This possibility is very consistent with recommendations to incorporate a DIT evaluation into standard developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART) protocols. The overall objective of this review is to provide a 'snapshot' of the current state-of-the-science of DIT. Despite significant progress, DIT is still evolving and it is our hope that this review will advance the science.

Development of a phospholipidosis database and predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models.

ABSTRACT Drug-induced phospholipidosis (PL) is a condition characterized by the accumulation of phospholipids and drug in lysosomes, and is found in a variety of tissue types. PL is frequently manifested in preclinical studies and may delay or prevent the development of pharmaceuticals. This report describes the construction of a database of PL findings in a variety of animal species and its use as a training data set for computational toxicology software. PL data and chemical structures were compiled from the published literature, existing pharmaceutical databases, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) internal reports yielding a total of 583 compounds suitable for modeling. The database contained 190 (33%) positive drugs and 393 (77%) negative drugs, of which 39 were electron microscopy-confirmed negative compounds and 354 were classified as negatives due to the absence of positive reported data. Of the 190 positive findings, 76 were electron microscopy confirmed and 114 were considered positive based on other evidence. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were constructed using two commercially available software programs, MC4PC and MDL-QSAR, and internal cross-validation (10 x 10%) experiments were performed to assess their predictive performance. Performance parameters for the MC4PC model were specificity 92%, sensitivity 50%, concordance 78%, positive predictivity 76%, and negative predictivity 78%. For MDL-QSAR, predictive performance was similar: specificity 80%, sensitivity 76%, concordance 79%, positive predictivity 65%, and negative predictivity 87%. By combining the output of the two QSAR programs, the overall predictive performance was vastly improved and sensitivity could be optimized to 81% without significant loss of specificity (79%). Many of the structural alerts and significant molecular descriptors obtained from the QSAR software were found to be associated with parts of active molecules known for their cationic amphiphilic drug (CAD) properties supporting the hypothesis that the endpoint of PL is statistically correlated with chemical structure. QSAR models can be useful tools for screening drug candidate molecules for potential PL.

Biological stress response terminology: Integrating the concepts of adaptive response and preconditioning stress within a hormetic dose-response framework.

Many biological subdisciplines that regularly assess dose-response relationships have identified an evolutionarily conserved process in which a low dose of a stressful stimulus activates an adaptive response that increases the resistance of the cell or organism to a moderate to severe level of stress. Due to a lack of frequent interaction among scientists in these many areas, there has emerged a broad range of terms that describe such dose-response relationships. This situation has become problematic because the different terms describe a family of similar biological responses (e.g., adaptive response, preconditioning, hormesis), adversely affecting interdisciplinary communication, and possibly even obscuring generalizable features and central biological concepts. With support from scientists in a broad range of disciplines, this article offers a set of recommendations we believe can achieve greater conceptual harmony in dose-response terminology, as well as better understanding and communication across the broad spectrum of biological disciplines.

Drug-induced phospholipidosis: issues and future directions.

Numerous drugs containing a cationic amphiphilic structure are capable of inducing phospholipidosis in cells under conditions of in vivo administration or ex vivo incubation. The principal characteristics of this condition include the reversible accumulation of polar phospholipids in association with the development of unicentric or multicentric lamellated bodies within cells. There is an abundance of data providing an understanding of potential mechanisms for the induction of phospholipidosis; however, the process is likely to be complex and may differ from one drug to another. The functional consequences of the presence of this condition on cellular or tissue function are not well understood. The general consensus is that the condition is an adaptive response rather than a toxicological manifestation; however, additional studies to examine this question are needed. Until this issue is resolved, concerns about phospholipidosis will continue to exist at regulatory agencies. Procedures for the screening of potential phospholipogenic candidate compounds are available. In contrast, a clear need exists for the identification of valid biomarkers to assess the development of phospholipidosis in preclinical and clinical studies.

Developmental toxicology evaluations--issues with including neurotoxicology and immunotoxicology assessments in reproductive toxicology studies.

Developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART) has routinely been a part of safety assessment. Attention is now focused on the effects of chemicals on the developing nervous and immune systems. This focus on developmental neurotoxicology (DNT) and developmental immunotoxicology (DIT) is based on the premise that children differ from adults in some aspects of their biology and, thus, may also differ in their responses to chemicals. This session's objective was to discuss issues common to DNT and DIT as they relate to DART protocols, including high dose selection and maternal toxicity, adequacy of pup exposure during lactation, use of a different dosing paradigm for DART versus DNT or DIT studies, and whether DIT and DNT endpoints can be incorporated into a single DART study for hazard identification purposes. Consensus was achieved on all topics except the adequacy for risk assessment purposes of the use of a limited number of endpoints for DIT and DNT, with the DNT endpoints being the primary focus of disagreement. Panelists indicated that a combination study design for hazard identification was feasible, though flexibility to meet the scientific needs of the project was emphasized. The adequacy of existing triggers for additional developmental studies was also questioned. Panelists iterated the importance of understanding pup exposure during the various life stages and the use of toxicokinetic data in designing these studies. The group agreed to consider the HESI ACSA Life Stages Task Force recommendations as a next step to address some of the issues and challenges raised during this session.

Clinical relevance of preclinical testing for allergic side effects.

Immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions include exaggerated humoral or cell mediated responses to specific antigens and may culminate in adverse, potentially life threatening effects. The immune status of the host and presence of infections or other disorders can alter the kind and extent of immune mediated side effects in individuals. Such variability in the immune status may influence the type of idiosyncratic reaction(s) that patients manifest. The issues typically encountered from a drug development standpoint include the potential for contact hypersensitivity, respiratory sensitivity, systemic hypersensitivity, photoallergy, and pseudoallergy. There are no accepted in vitro or in vivo models available to measure and predict all types of hypersensitivity reactions in humans. There is a need for the development of preclinical models to predict all types of hypersensitivity reactions in humans. The FDA immunotoxicology guidance document recommends doing preclinical testing in animal models for topical and inhalational drugs before initiation of multiple dose studies in humans. Any signs of potential immune related drug hypersensitivity should be further evaluated in an attempt to further understand the potential for hypersensitivity reactions in humans. In summary, existing preclinical models have limited capability for prediction of drug allergy in humans except for topical and inhalational drugs. Additional tools are needed to evaluate drugs in early development and improve performance of existing assays.

Evaluation of a lymph node proliferation assay for its ability to detect pharmaceuticals with potential to cause immune-mediated drug reactions.

Hypersensitivity reactions to systemically administered drugs cannot be predicted using available preclinical models. This research is a collaborative project to evaluate the ability of the Lymph Node Proliferation Assay (LNPA) to predict systemic hypersensitivity caused by pharmaceuticals. The assay design is a modification of the Local Lymph Node Assay with the major modification being injection of the test substance subcutaneously to achieve a known systemic exposure to the drug. Fourteen compounds were evaluated in the LNPA. These were two clinically negative drugs (Metformin, phenobarbital), an assay positive control (streptozotocin), eight human hypersensitivity positive drugs (sulfamethoxazole, procainamide, clonidine, ofloxacin, nevirapine, abacavir, lamotrigine, zomepirac), and 3 investigational drugs (CM40874, CM40954 and CM40420), one of which caused hypersensitivity in primates. Hypersensitivity-positive drugs were classified as such based on at least two of three independent data sources: U.S. FDA postmarketing database, drug labeling information, and clinical trial data. All drugs were tested in multiple laboratories for a total of 2-12 evaluations per compound. The pure drug substance was used for testing if it could be obtained commercially, otherwise the marketed drug formulation was used. Neither of the negative control drugs showed a positive reaction in the test system. Four of the eight hypersensitivity positive drugs showed a mixed or positive reaction. Two of the three investigational compounds gave a positive response. A smaller number of LNPAs were run concurrently using footpad injection and evaluation of the popliteal lymph node and gave generally comparable results. Additional development may increase the reproducibility of the assay and facilitate detection of drugs that require metabolic activation to become allergenic, or drugs for which there is dose-limiting toxicity. The data suggest that this method might be useful as a first-line screen to identify candidate drugs that are more likely to cause a high prevalence of human drug hypersensitivity.

Development of the ICH guidelines for immunotoxicology evaluation of pharmaceuticals using a survey of industry practices.

An anonymous survey of pharmaceutical industry practices for immunotoxicology evaluation was conducted. This was in support of the development of the guideline on the preclinical evaluation of unintended modulation of the immune system for the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. The survey was conducted in two phases in 2003 and 2004. A total of 64 responses were received of which 45 were included in the formal evaluation. The remaining compounds were excluded because they were cytotoxic anti-neoplastic drugs (N = 7), or due to insufficient information (N = 12). The purpose of the survey was to gather data on the correlation between routine toxicology studies (RTS) and additional immunotoxicological studies (AIS). The results of the survey were evaluated by the Expert Working Group (EWG) and classified as to positive or negative findings in RTS and AIS. The results of the survey showed that for 27 of 45 compounds (60%), the RTS and AIS endpoints were in agreement. In 12 of 45 cases (27%), the RTS endpoints showed immune modulation not observed in the AIS assays. Finally for 6 of 45 drugs (13%) a response was seen with the AIS methods where no significant effect was observed in the RTS endpoints. Length of dosing and the number of tests evaluated were similar in all groups. The groups where RTS detected signs of immunosuppression were more likely to have been dosed at or above MTD. This data contributed to the consensus in the EWG that routine immune function testing as an initial screen for all new drugs is not required. Instead, a weight-of-evidence approach including RTS and other causes for concern is recommended to identify the need for additional immunotoxicity studies.

Prospects for developmental immunotoxicity guidance and an update on ICH S8.

Potential adverse effects of drug exposure on the developing immune system had been a relatively neglected area of toxicology until fairly recently. However, with the recent regulatory emphasis on evaluation of drugs for use in pediatric patients, juvenile animal studies have been considered in much more detail than in the past in order to enable clinical trials. Assessment of immunotoxicity potential in these juvenile animal studies has been a natural consequence of drug development for pediatric patients. Unfortunately, the efforts to evaluate developmental immunotoxicity studies have not kept pace with the writing of an immunotoxicology guidance for the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Human Pharmaceuticals (ICH). This document has recently reached Step 4 in the approval process: it is thus likely that juvenile animal studies for immunotoxicity would be recommended based on considerations enumerated in the ICH Safety Number 8 (S8) guidance. Sufficient flexibility exists in this document to cover the issue of developmental immunotoxicity. ICH S8 advocates a weight-of-evidence approach, which should be interpreted to indicate that immunotoxicity testing would be conducted based on identified cause(s) for concern rather than as a routine screening method. The presentation reflecting these issues, as presented to attendees of the Pharmaceutical Education Associates workshop on Innovative Methods and Applications for Risk Assessment in Pharmaceutical Development is summarized herein.