Geospatial Distribution of Ophthalmologists Older than Age 60 Years Relative to the Prevalence of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases as of February 1, 2021 and the proportion of ophthalmologists in the United States older than age 60 years to provide a framework for successful vaccine distribution for the ophthalmology workforce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Association of American Medical Colleges ophthalmologist workforce dataset (from 2019) for each state was combined with John Hopkins University's COVID-19 tracking data to determine exposure risk for ophthalmologists, especially those older than age 60 years. RESULTS: Of the 18,915 practicing ophthalmologists in the US, 37.6% are older than age 60 years. North Dakota (48.4%), Connecticut (46.8%), and Maine (46.7%) have the highest percentages. South Dakota (9,567), Utah (7,559), and Idaho (7,411) currently have the highest COVID-19 exposure burden per ophthalmologist older than age 60 years as of February 1, 2021. CONCLUSION: Care must be taken to distribute the COVID-19 vaccine in a safe and proactive manner to ophthalmologists that face high exposure risk, both to ensure physician safety and ensure adequate care for the population they serve. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:556-559.].

Visual outcomes following cataract surgery in age-related macular degeneration patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate visual acuity (VA) outcomes, prognostic factors, and changes in disease severity in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) undergoing cataract surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Patients with AMD or healthy control patients who underwent cataract surgery between 2012 and 2017. METHODS: Eyes were categorized into 3 AMD groups-intermediate AMD (iAMD), fovea-involving geographic atrophy (GA), neovascular AMD (nAMD)-and 3 preoperative VA-matched control groups (iAMDc), fovea-involving geographic atrophy control (GAc), neovaascular AMD control (nAMDc). RESULTS: We compared 216 iAMD, 35 GA, and 184 nAMD eyes with 130, 31, and 129 controls. At postoperative month 12 (POM12), VA increased significantly in iAMD and nAMD (+10.1 ± 14.5 and +9.7 ± 18.9 letters, p < 0.001), but not in GA (p = 0.68). All control groups showed significant VA gains (iAMDc: +17.1 ± 9.7, GAc: +30 ± 12.9, and nAMDc: +26.4 ± 15.6 letters, p < 0.001). For AMD groups, POM12 VA and gain in VA were significantly lower than that of controls (p < 0.01), and better preoperative VA predicted smaller VA gains (p ≤ 0.007). Longer duration of AMD in iAMD, ellipsoid zone disruption in nAMD, and lower central subfield thickness in GA were associated with poorer VA outcomes (p < 0.05). Development of nAMD occurred in 8 iAMD eyes and was associated with longer duration of disease (p = 0.001). For nAMD eyes, injection frequency did not vary between the 12-month pre- and postoperative periods (p = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery improves VA for patients with iAMD and nAMD, albeit not to the level of those without retinal pathology. Preoperative VA, AMD duration, and optical coherence tomography parameters may be important prognostic factors for cataract surgery in patients with AMD.