RESUMO
Up to 50% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients are ineligible for participation in clinical trials. Ineligible patients have inferior outcomes, but less is known about the impact of commonly used organ-function-based inclusion criteria on drug efficacy estimates. Data on DLBCL patients treated with CHOP+/-rituximab were retrieved from the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Trial inclusion criteria were extracted from four international DLBCL trials (REMoDL-B, GOYA, POLARIX, and HOVON-84). Differences in overall survival (OS) and 5-year restricted mean survival differences (5 y-RMSDs) between trial eligible and ineligible patients were computed. The effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was quantified by the 5 y-RMSD between CHOP and R-CHOP-treated patients and the impact of individual trial criteria on estimated effectiveness was quantified by Shapley-values. In total, 4,083 R-CHOP-treated and 890 CHOP-treated DLBCL patients were included. Across the trials, 18.6-29.3% of the included R-CHOP-treated patients were deemed ineligible for trial based on organ function and performance status alone. Ineligible patients had significantly worse survival, with adjusted absolute differences in 5-year OS of 9-15%. The impact of individual criteria on the estimated effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was small (Shapley-value range, -2.74-0.31). Using a smaller set of criteria derived from a data-driven approach, the number of eligible patients increased by 16-38% and the 5 y-RMSD increased by 0.7-3.1 months. In conclusion, OS among trial ineligible DLBCL patients is inferior as expected, but relaxing trial criteria would have increased the number of trial participants without making major changes in estimated efficacy for a hypothetical CHOP versus R-CHOP trial. This does not necessarily imply that trial findings based on selected patients are unreliable, as the estimated effectiveness of adding rituximab to CHOP was only slightly affected by omitting selected inclusion criteria.
RESUMO
Purpose: Serious illness communication is a core task in hemato-oncology that require advanced communication skills and can be emotionally demanding. A 2-day course was implemented as a mandatory part of the 5-year hematology specialist training program in Denmark in 2021. The aim of this study was to assess the quantitative and qualitative effect of course participation on self-efficacy in serious illness communication and measure the prevalence of burnout among physicians in hematology specialist training. Methods: For quantitative assessment course participants answered three questionnaires: Self-efficacy Advance care planning (ACP), Self-efficacy Existential communication (EC) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks after the course. The control group answered the questionnaires once. Qualitative assessment was performed as structured group interviews with course participants 4 weeks after the course, transcribed, coded, and transformed into themes. Results: All self-efficacy EC scores and 12 out of 17 self-efficacy ACP scores improved after the course, though mostly non-significant. Course participants reported altered clinical practice and perception of role as a physician. The physicians' confidence that they could find the time to discuss ACP were low and remained low. The prevalence of burnout was high. Burnout levels were non-significantly lower after the course. Conclusion: A mandatory course of formal training can increase physician self-efficacy in serious illness communication and alter clinical practice and perception of roles. The high level of burnout among physicians in hemato-oncology calls for institutional interventions in addition to training.