Economic Evaluation of Changes in Reimbursement for Medications Purchased Through the 340B Drug Pricing Program.

Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented changes to the reimbursement scheme for 340B-acquired medications on January 1, 2018, reducing payments by approximately 25%. It was recognized that these changes would have a significant fiscal impact to Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Health. The purpose of this assessment was to review the financial impact of changes in Medicare reimbursement for clinic-administered medications. Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective, financial evaluation of closed outpatient encounters for Medicare beneficiaries in calendar year 2018. Actual reimbursement was calculated for 2018. To better characterize the margin obtained, exploratory analyses were completed to identify best- and worst-case reimbursement outcomes. This exploratory analysis was conducted for both the new (ASP-22.5%) and old (ASP+6%) reimbursement schemes. Results: Overall, 10 973 encounters were reviewed for inclusion. Ultimately, 8028 encounters were included in the final analysis. Of all encounters, 88 unique medications were administered. Most of the drugs (55%) were associated with oncologic indications. An unfavorable variance was found in 3761 encounters (47%). The actual reimbursement margin for 2018 was $3 193 525. Conclusion: Changes to reimbursement outlined by the CMS at the start of 2018 resulted in decreased reimbursement for 340B-eligible, clinic-administered medications. Most of the unfavorable variances were associated with 340B acquisition prices that exceeded reimbursement. Although the original intent of the 340B Drug Pricing Program was to stretch federal resources, decreased payments could reduce institutional ability to fund programs that support medically vulnerable populations.

Effect of Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin Prophylaxis on Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: A Retrospective Evaluation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Characterize the incidence of elevated aPTT results in patients treated with prophylactic, subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH). DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort analysis. SETTING: Single-center, university hospital. MEASUREMENTS: Evaluation of 257 patients with activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) testing both prior to and following subcutaneous (SC) unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy. MAIN RESULTS: Evaluated patients received UFH 5000 units every 8 hours. Baseline aPTT values were within the normal range (mean±SD, 32.0±8.5 seconds). After initiation of UFH, aPTT values increased (mean±SD, 37.6±15.2 seconds). After 24 hours of SC UFH, mean aPTT values (mean±SD, 38.6±15.5) exceeded the normal laboratory range (23.3-35.7 seconds). An elevated aPTT result after UFH was associated with baseline aPTT, length of therapy, and weight-based UFH dose. A significant association was not identified between aPTT elevation and age, race, sex, history of liver disease, type of admission, or transfusion of blood products. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with UFH resulted in a small, but significant, increase in aPTT.

Clinical and Financial Impact of Pharmacist Involvement in Discharge Medication Reconciliation at an Academic Medical Center: A Prospective Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Medication reconciliation is one of the more challenging aspects of inpatient care, and its accuracy is paramount to safe transitions of care. Studies have shown that pharmacists have a role in medication reconciliation through improving patient safety and avoiding costs associated with medication errors. The wide-scale use of pharmacists in this process has been limited by time constraints, cost, and lack of resources. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the impact of pharmacists in resolving medication errors, decreasing readmission rates, and reducing institutional costs during the discharge medication reconciliation process. METHODS: Pharmacists evaluated discharge medication reconciliation documentation for patients to determine its accuracy, the accuracy of the admission reconciliation documentation, and any potential issues unrelated to accuracy. Analysis of these data determined the time required for pharmacist involvement, the number of errors identified by pharmacists, the quality of pharmacist interventions, the cost avoidance for each error, and the overall impact on hospital readmission. RESULTS: During the 7-week study period, pharmacists performed 67 discharge medication reviews and identified 84 errors. Seventy-five percent were considered to be significant and 6% were considered to be serious. The 30-day readmission rate in the study cohort was 18% compared with 20% in the control group. Based on the clinical severity scale and pharmacist salaries, pharmacist interventions resulted in $42,300 in cost avoidance. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists involved in this pilot discharge process identified and resolved significant errors on medication reconciliation orders that resulted in a financial benefit to the institution.

Evaluation of discharge medication orders following automatic therapeutic substitution of commonly exchanged drug classes.

OBJECTIVE: Automatic therapeutic substitution (ATS) is a mechanism that, upon patient hospitalization, prompts the pharmacist to exchange an equivalent formulary drug for a nonformulary medication, typically without prescriber contact. In facilities utilizing ATS, there is the possibility that physicians and patients may be unaware of the substitution, potentially leading to drug-drug interactions, therapeutic duplication, and/or increased patient expense following discharge should the original regimen not be resumed. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency with which hospitalized patients subjected to an ATS protocol were not returned to outpatient drug therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of adult patients admitted to an academic medical center between January 1 and June 30, 2011, was conducted. Patients were included if they were admitted on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, antidepressants, nonsedating antihistamines, histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and were then prescribed a different agent via ATS. Admission and discharge medication reconciliation documents, dictated discharge summaries, and patient education documentation reports were reviewed for drug therapies and doses, as well as medication counseling evidence. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients not returned to original outpatient therapy following ATS. Secondary endpoints included prescribing events in patients not returned to original therapy, the rate and source of drug therapy counseling at discharge, and the number of patients discharged on a potentially cost-prohibitive drug, defined as any drug available only as a branded product during the study period. RESULTS: A total of 317 interventions were identified through review of pharmacy records. Of these, 47 patients (15%) were not returned to original outpatient therapy. Within this subsection, 15 patients (32%) were discharged on the substituted drug, eight patients (17%) resumed initial therapy but received a dosage adjustment from previous outpatient therapy, and three patients (6%) were discharged on a drug that was neither the substituted product nor the previous outpatient therapy. The remaining 21 patients had therapy discontinued (n = 12/47, 26%) or lacked documentation of discharge therapy (9/47, 19%). Nursing staff provided medication counseling to 288 of the 317 patients (91%). Overall, 51 patients (16%) were identified as receiving a cost-prohibitive drug. CONCLUSION: Patients subject to ATS of commonly substituted drug classes were returned to their original outpatient drug therapy more than 85% of the time following inpatient hospitalizations, with similar rates of medication counseling at discharge. The prescribing of cost-prohibitive drugs has been identified as a potential area for pharmacist intervention at discharge.