Antiproliferative Effect of Lapatinib in HER2-Positive and HER2-Negative/HER3-High Breast Cancer: Results of the Presurgical Randomized MAPLE Trial (CRUK E/06/039).

PURPOSE: Not all breast cancers respond to lapatinib. A change in Ki67 after short-term exposure may elucidate a biomarker profile for responsive versus nonresponsive tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Women with primary breast cancer were randomized (3:1) to 10 to 14 days of preoperative lapatinib or placebo in a multicenter phase II trial (ISRCTN68509377). Biopsies pre-/posttreatment were analyzed for Ki67, apoptosis, HER2, EGFR, ER, PgR, pAKT, pERK, and stathmin by IHC. Further markers were measured by RT-PCR. Primary endpoint was change in Ki67. HER2(+) was defined as 2+/3+ by IHC and FISH(+). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one patients (lapatinib, 94; placebo, 27) were randomized; of these, 21% were HER2(+), 78% were HER2(-) nonamplified, 26% were EGFR(+). Paired samples containing tumor were obtained for 98% (118 of 121). Ki67 fell significantly with lapatinib (-31%; P < 0.001), but not with placebo (-3%). Whereas Ki67 reduction with lapatinib was greatest in HER2(+) breast cancer (-46%; P = 0.003), there was a significant Ki67 decrease in HER2(-) breast cancer (-27%; P = 0.017) with 14% of HER2(-) breast cancer demonstrating ≥50% Ki67 reduction with lapatinib. Among HER2(+) patients, the only biomarker predictive of Ki67 response was the EGFR/HER4 ligand epiregulin (EREG) (rho = -0.7; P = 0.002). Among HER2(-) tumors, only HER3 mRNA levels were significantly associated with Ki67 response on multivariate analysis (P = 0.01). In HER2(-) breast cancer, HER2 and HER3 mRNA levels were highly correlated (rho = 0.67, P < 0.001), with all Ki67 responders having elevated HER3 and HER2 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Lapatinib has antiproliferative effects in a subgroup of HER2(-) nonamplified tumors characterized by high HER3 expression. The possible role of high HER2:HER3 heterodimers in predicting response to lapatinib merits investigation in HER2(-) tumors.

Relationship of body mass index with aromatisation and plasma and tissue oestrogen levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Recent data have raised concern about the clinical efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in overweight and/or obese breast cancer patients. We report in vivo aromatase inhibition and plasma and tissue oestrogen levels in relation to body mass index (BMI) status among breast cancer patients treated with different aromatase inhibitors. METHODS: We compared data on in vivo aromatase inhibition (64 patients) as well as plasma and tissue oestrogen levels from patients participating in our studies to BMI values. RESULTS: We found a weak positive correlation between pretreatment aromatisation level and BMI (n=64; R=0.236; p=0.060) but no correlation between on-treatment aromatisation levels or percentage aromatase inhibition and BMI within patient subgroups treated with any of a panel of aromatase inhibitors. Pre-treatment levels of plasma estradiol (p<0.001), estrone (p=0.001) and estrone sulphate (p=0.002) correlated to BMI. While on-treatment levels of plasma estrane sulphate correlated to BMI in patients on letrozole (R=0.601; p=0.001; n=25 for all) or anastrozole (n=12; R=0.611; p=0.035) therapy, letrozole suppressed plasma estrone sulphate more than anastrozole independent of BMI. No correlation between on-treatment tumour oestrogen levels and BMI was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Our unique data do not support a lack of effective aromatase inhibition in overweight patients or therefore a need for alternative therapy. The higher levels of estrogens in overweight postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during aromatase inhibition may be due to effects of BMI on oestrogen metabolism rather than aromatisation.