Concussion education for youth athletes using Pre-Game Safety Huddles: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Determine whether Pre-Game Safety Huddles, a novel and low-resource approach to concussion education, increase the expected likelihood of concussion reporting for youth athletes. METHODS: A cluster-randomised trial compared Safety Huddles to usual care. Safety Huddles bring together athletes and coaches from both teams before the start of each game for coaches to briefly affirm the importance of speaking up if a concussion is suspected. Participants were athletes from 22 competitive community-based American football and girls and boys soccer teams (ages 9-14), and randomisation into intervention or control occurred at the level of the bracket (group of teams that compete against each other during the regular season). The primary outcome was expected likelihood of reporting concussion symptoms to the coach, measured via validated athlete survey at the beginning and end of the season. RESULTS: Of 343 eligible participants, 339 (99%) completed baseline surveys and 303 (88%) completed surveys at season end. The mean (SD) age was 11.4 (1.1) years, 26% were female soccer athletes, 27% were male soccer athletes and 47% were football athletes. In adjusted analyses accounting for baseline values and clustering by sport and team via random effects, expected likelihood of concussion reporting at the end of the season was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to controls (mean difference=0.49, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.88; Cohen's d=0.35). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pre-Game Safety Huddles increased the expected likelihood of athletes reporting concussion symptoms. While further study is warranted, sport organisations should consider this approach a promising low-resource option for improving concussion safety in their setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04099329.

Influence of Binary Toxin Gene Detection and Decreased Susceptibility to Antibiotics among Clostridioides difficile Strains on Disease Severity: a Single-Center Study.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the fifth leading cause of death from nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease in the United States. The contribution of resistance to C. difficile-active antibiotics to the outcomes of CDI is unclear. We evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of C. difficile isolates in a U.S. hospital and determined associations of clinical variables and binary toxin positivity with antibiotic resistance. C. difficile spores were cultured from fecal specimens of adult patients with CDI for genotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility assay (for clindamycin [CLI], fidaxomicin [FDX], metronidazole [MTZ], moxifloxacin [MXF], tigecycline [TGC], and vancomycin [VAN]). Electronic medical records were reviewed for clinical data extraction. Ninety-seven of 130 (75%) fecal samples grew toxigenic C. difficile in culture. Most of the isolates were tcdA+ tcdB+ cdtB- (80.4%), and 18.6% and 1% were tcdA+ tcdB+ cdtB+ and tcdA-tcdB+ cdtB+, respectively. Susceptibility to VAN, MTZ, FDX, TGC, MXF, and CLI was 96%, 94%, 100%, 100%, 8%, and 79%, respectively. Six isolates, all cdtB positive and belonging to the 027 ribotype, were resistant to VAN and/or MTZ. Higher MICs were found in isolates with a mutation in the VAN-related resistance gene vanR, but not vanS. In addition, cdtB+ isolates exhibited higher MICs of VAN, MTZ, TGC, CLI, and MXF compared to cdtB- strains. Patients with greater intestinal inflammation or severe disease were more likely to be infected with cdtB+ strains. Decreased susceptibility to antibiotics is not directly associated with either severe or recurrent CDI. However, antimicrobial susceptibility of C. difficile is decreased in strains positive for the binary toxin gene.

Stakeholder-Engaged Development of a Theory-Driven, Feasible, and Acceptable Approach to Concussion Education.

Concussion education is widely mandated and largely ineffective. Recent consensus guidance on concussion education asserts the importance of (1) theory-driven programming that targets the team as a system and (2) working with end users throughout the development process, and considering issues such as feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability. Consistent with this guidance, and in collaboration with youth sport stakeholders in two regions of the United States, we developed a novel approach to concussion education: Pre-game safety huddles. Safety huddles have the following two core components: (1) athletes, coaches, and other stakeholders come together before the start of each game and (2) opinion leaders (coaches, referees) affirm the importance of care seeking for suspected concussion. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the collaborative process through which we refined the safety huddle concept into an acceptable and feasible intervention with potential for sustainable implementation in diverse youth sports settings with minimal resource demands. In describing our process and discussing challenges and opportunities, we hope to provide an example for others seeking to develop and implement injury prevention interventions in youth sports settings.

Development of a scale to measure expected concussion reporting behavior.

BACKGROUND: Most concussion education aims to increase athlete self-report of concussive symptoms. Although the population burden of concussion is high, frequency with which this injury occurs on a given sports team in a given season is relatively low. This means that powering concussion education evaluation studies to measure change in post-injury symptom reporting behavior requires what is often a prohibitively large sample size. Thus, evaluation studies are typically powered to measure proximal cognitions. Expected reporting behavior, a cognition that reflects planned and reactive decision-making, is a theoretically indicated construct for inclusion in evaluation studies. However, previously no scales were available to measure this construct with demonstrated reliability and validity among youth athletes. The objective of this study was to develop and assess the validity of a brief single-factor scale to measure expected youth athlete concussion reporting behavior (CR-E) in a sample of youth athletes. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used, including cognitive interviews with youth athletes, and quantitative item reduction and validation. Participants were youth athletes (aged 9-16) from the Seattle metropolitan and rural south-Georgia regions. After refining an initial pool of items using cognitive interviews with a diverse group of youth athletes (n = 20), a survey containing these items was administered to youth soccer and football players (n = 291). Item reduction statistics and sequential confirmatory factor analyses were used to reduce the initial scale using a randomly selected half of the sample. Then, a final confirmatory factor analysis and validation tests were applied to the other half of the sample of youth athletes. Predictive validation was conducted longitudinally in a separate sample of youth athletes (n = 155). RESULTS: Internal consistency was high (alpha = 0.89), model fit was excellent, validation tests were in the hypothesized directions, and the scale was feasible to use. Using the finalized 4-item scale, we observed that less than one-third of youth soccer and football athletes expect to "always" tell their coach about symptoms of a suspected concussion. CONCLUSIONS: The CR-E measure should be included in future studies evaluating concussion education programming in youth athlete populations.

Hospitalized Older Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection Refractory to Conventional Antibiotic Therapy Benefit from Fecal Microbiota Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Options for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) refractory to conventional therapy are limited. Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is considered safe and effective treatment for recurrent CDI and could be a treatment option for refractory CDI. We investigated the efficacy and safety of FMT in hospitalized patients who were not responding to standard treatments for CDI. METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients who received FMT inpatient for refractory CDI were reviewed as part of quality improvement efforts to evaluate safety and efficacy of FMT in inpatient setting. RESULTS: Between July 2014 and December 2019, 9 patients (age 60-96) received FMT for CDI as inpatient for refractory or fulminant CDI. Most (7 of 9) of these patients had pseudomembranous colitis and underwent multiple FMTs (mean 2.15, range 1 to 3). Five patients had complete resolution and one patient had diarrhea that was C. difficile-negative. There was one recurrent CDI and two deaths, one of which may have been related to FMT or CDI. Compared to recurrent CDI at diagnosis, patients with refractory CDI had higher WBC and neutrophil counts, which decreased after FMT. The overall cure rate of FMT in refractory cases was 66.7%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows moderate efficacy of FMT for treatment of refractory CDI although multiple FMT treatment may need to be administered in the presence of pseudomembranous colitis. Inpatient FMT may be an alternative strategy for managing refractory CDI in this population of patients who may not have any effective medical treatment available.

Atypical presentation of Clostridioides difficile pseudomembranous colitis with laboratory rejection of stool specimen.

Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile is a major cause of nocosomial infection in the USA and worldwide. It has a wide spectrum of presentation, ranging from an asymptomatic carrier state to fulminant colitis. Pseudomembranous colitis is a manifestation of severe C. difficile infection (CDI), typically with progressive symptoms including watery diarrhoea, abdominal cramping and fevers and elevated white cell count and/or creatinine. It is diagnosed on three levels, including clinical assessment, stool assays and visualisation of the colonic mucosa. Laboratories will reject stools that do not meet criteria for testing. In the era of molecular testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile DNA, which only indicates the potential for infection, it is vital to use clinical evaluation in the diagnosis of CDI. We present an atypical case of pseudomembranous colitis affecting the right colon in a patient whose stools were rejected multiple times for C. difficile testing.