Evolution and distribution of rabies viruses from a panorama view.

Rabies kills more than 59,000 people annually, mainly in developing countries. Previous studies on the evolution and distribution of rabies viruses (RABVs) were scattered. Here, we explore the evolution and distribution of this deadly virus from a novel panorama view. Multiple bioinformatic software tools were employed to analyze the phylogenetic diversity, evolution, spatiotemporal, and distribution of RABVs. The analyses were based on 1,202 qualified full-length genomes of RABVs and numerous literatures. Of the 10 distinct phylogenetic clades of RABV that we identified, more frequent intra- and inter-clade recombination occurs in the sequences of Asian-SEA, Arctic, and Cosmopolitan clades isolated from China, while according to existing sequence information, RABV might originate from bats (posterior probability, PP = 0.75, PP = 0.60 inferred from N and L genes, separately) in North America (PP = 0.57, PP = 0.62 inferred from N and L genes, separately). Due to the difference in evolutionary rate of N (2.22 × 10-4 subs/site/year, 95% HPD 1.99-2.47 × 10-4 subs/site/year) and L genes (1.67 × 10-4 subs/site/year, 95% HPD 1.59-1.74 × 10-4 subs/site/year), the root age was 1,406.6 (95% HPD 1,291.2-1,518.2) and 1,122.7 (95% HPD 1,052.4-1,193.9) inferred from N and L genes, separately. Among other findings, Mephitidae plays an important role in the interspecific transmission and communication of RABV, which we found tends to spread to populations genetically proximate to the host. We also identified amino acids under positive selection in different genes of different clades as well as single nucleotide variation sites important for different lineages. IMPORTANCE Rabies virus is widely distributed all over the world, and wild animals are its largest potential reservoir. Our study offers a panorama view about evolution and distribution of rabies viruses and emphasizes the need to monitor the transmission dynamics of animal rabies.

A network meta-analysis of short-term efficacy of different single-drug targeted therapies in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

The network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the short-term efficacy of different single-drug targeted therapies in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We initially searched databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on different single-drug targeted therapies in treating RCC. The meta-analysis combined the direct and indirect evidence to calculate the pooled odds ratios (OR) and draw surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). A total of 14 eligible RCTs were ultimately selected. The partial response (PR) of Cabozantinib in the treatment of RCC was better than Sunitinib (OR = 2.7, 95%CI = 1.0-7.8), Everolimus (OR = 8.1, 95%CI = 3.1-25.0), and Temsirolimus (OR = 4.8, 95%CI = 1.0-31.0); the overall response rate (ORR) of Cabozantinib was better than Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Everolimus, and Temsirolimus (OR = 5.5, 95%CI = 1.1-27.0; OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.1-6.6; OR = 8.3, 95%CI = 3.5-20.0; OR = 5.7, 95%CI = 1.3-28.0 respectively). In addition, as for complete response (CR), PR, stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), ORR, and disease control rate (DCR), Cabozantinib had the best short-term efficacy among nine single-drug targeted therapies in the treatment of RCC (CR: 50.3%; PR: 93.6%; SD: 75.1%; PD: 68.0%; ORR: 95.5%; DCR: 73.2%); while Everolimus had the worst short-term efficacy (CR: 33.6%; PR: 22.3%; SD: 78.0%; PD: 35.9%; ORR: 22.9%; DCR: 19.9%). Our network meta-analysis indicated that Cabozantinib might have better short-term efficacy than other regimens in the treatment of RCC, while Everolimus might have poor short-term efficacy.

[Effects of Montessori education on the intellectual development in children aged 2 to 4 years].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of Montessori education and traditional education on the intellectual development in children aged 2 to 4 years. METHODS: Children aged between 2 to 3 years who were enrolled in a kindergarten in September 2006 were randomly assigned to the Montessori education and the traditional education groups. In addition to receiving the traditional education, the Montessori education group participated in the two-hour Montessori pedagogical activities every day. The intellectual development was evaluated by the Neuropsychological Development Examination Format for Children Aged 0~6 years published by Capital Pediatrics Research Institute at enrollment and one year after the trial. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the intelligence growth level between the Montessori education and the traditional education groups at enrollment. After one year, the levels of fine movements, adaptation ability, language, and social behavior developments in the Montessori education group were significantly higher than those in the traditional education group (p<0.05 or 0.01). The intelligence increasing scores of the large motor ability, fine movements, language, social behavior and development quotient in the Montessori education group were also higher than those in the traditional education group (p<0.05 or 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Montessori education can promote the development of large motor ability, fine movements, language, and social behavior in children.