RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy (MAE). METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted between MAE and traditional transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE). For a comparative analysis of MAE and TTE, we searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We identified the relevant literature and extracted the relevant data. Finally, RevMan 5.3 software was applied to conduct a meta-analysis of the data. RESULTS: A total of 1256 people were enrolled in 16 studies, comprising 575 patients with MAE and 681 with TTE. The findings revealed that the pulmonary complications, cardiac complications, and postoperative hospital stay in the MAE group were significantly better than those in the TTE group. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in postoperative chylothorax, anastomotic fistula, and postoperative mortality. But the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in the MAE group was higher than that in the TTE group (odds ratio=1.64, 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.35, P =0.006). The MAE group had less lymph node dissection than the TTE group (mean difference=-4.62, 95% CI, -5.97 to 3.45, P <0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis presented that MAE was safe and feasible, reduced postoperative pulmonary and cardiac complications, and shortened hospital stay, but lymph node dissection was less, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was higher, and the impact of long-term survival prognosis required more randomized controlled trials.