Clinical application of pharmacogenetics.

Pharmacogenetics encompasses the involvement of genes in an individual's response to drugs. As such, the field covers a vast area including basic drug discovery research, the genetic basis of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, new drug development, patient genetic testing and clinical patient management. Ultimately, the goal of pharmacogenetics is to predict a patient's genetic response to a specific drug as a means of delivering the best possible medical treatment. By predicting the drug response of an individual, it will be possible to increase the success of therapies and reduce the incidence of adverse side effects.

Safety, tolerability, and antiretroviral effects of ritonavir-nelfinavir combination therapy administered for 48 weeks.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and anti-HIV activity of ritonavir-nelfinavir (RTV-NFV). DESIGN: Single-site, open-label, nonrandomized, multiple-dose trial of RTV combined with two doses of NFV in protease inhibitor (PI)-naive, HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Mean baseline HIV RNA was 39,500 copies/ml; mean baseline CD4 count was 323 cells/mm3. All patients received RTV at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily. Cohorts I (N = 10) and II (N = 10) received NFV at a dosage of 500 mg and 750 mg twice daily, respectively, for the initial 12 weeks of the study before allowing intensification with reverse transcriptase inhibitors. RESULTS: The commonest effects of RTV-NFV therapy were study drug-related moderate-to-severe diarrhea (9 patients in cohorts I and II) and drug-related moderate-to-severe nausea (4 patients in cohorts I and II). HIV RNA was suppressed in a biphasic manner. At 48 weeks in cohort I, mean HIV RNA reduction was 2.82 log10 copies/ml (standard error [SE] =.61; p =.001; N = 4); mean CD4 cell count increase was 236 cells/mm3 (SE = 67.1; p =.006; N = 4). In cohort II, mean HIV RNA reduction at Week 48 was 2.21 log10 copies/ml (SE =.430; p =. 001; N = 8); mean CD4 cell count increase was 120 cells/mm3 (SE = 47. 5; p =.03; n = 8). In cohort I patients, 2 of 4 completing Week 48 had HIV RNA <20 copies/ml; and 3 of 4 had HIV RNA <400 copies/ml. In cohort II, 2 of 8 patients completing Week 48 had HIV RNA <20 copies/ml and 4 of 8 had HIV RNA <400 copies/ml. In addition, 3 patients in cohort I withdrew because of virologic failure not thought to be related to poor compliance. Moreover, 15 patients elected to add new reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) after week 12. CONCLUSIONS: RTV-NFV with concomitant reverse transcriptase inhibitors is a potential dual-PI option for PI-naive patients.

Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy and thymic transplantation on immunoreconstitution in HIV infection.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether thymic transplantation in addition to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) will restore T cell function in HIV infection. Eight treatment-naive HIV-infected patients with CD4+ T cell counts of 200-500/mm3 were randomized into thymic transplantation and control arms. All patients received HAART (zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir) for 6 weeks prior to transplantation. Thymic transplantation was done without immunosuppression, using postnatal HLA-unmatched cultured allogeneic thymus tissue. Patients were immunized every 6 months with the neoantigen keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and the recall antigen tetanus toxoid (TT). T cell phenotype and function and T cell receptor rearrangement excision circles (TRECs) were assessed. Thymic allografts were biopsied at 2 months. Six HIV-infected patients completed the study. Four patients received cultured allogeneic postnatal thymic grafts, two others were controls. CD4+ T cell counts increased and T cell-proliferative responses to Candida antigen and TT normalized in all patients. Proliferative responses to KLH developed in three of four transplant recipients and one of two controls. Patients responding to KLH after secondary immunization had greater TREC increases compared with the patients who did not respond. All thymic allografts were rejected within 2 months. In summary, four of six patients developed T cell-proliferative responses to the neoantigen KLH over the first 2 years of HAART. The transplanted thymus tissue, however, was rejected. There was no clear difference in restoration of T cell function in the transplant recipients compared with the controls. Increases in TRECs after initiation of HAART may correlate with improved immune function.

Response to immunization with recall and neoantigens after prolonged administration of an HIV-1 protease inhibitor-containing regimen. ACTG 375 team. AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain if immunization results in the restoration of responses to recall antigens, in the development of responses to presumed neoantigens, and to identify the virologic and immunologic correlates of these responses in persons with HIV-1 infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: Open-label study carried out at three university-affiliated AIDS Clinical Trials Units in the United States. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one subjects participating in AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 375 who had received zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir for at least 48 weeks. Subjects were immunized with tetanus toxoid (TT) at entry and with inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (hep A) and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) at entry and 6 weeks. The development of antibody, lymphocyte proliferative assay (LPA), and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses after immunization were monitored. RESULTS: The LPA and DTH responses to TT improved in 57 and 68% of participants, respectively; 73 and 65% developed enhanced LPA and DTH responses to KLH. Forty-eight percent of patients developed a four-fold increase in antibody concentration to tetanus. Seventy-three percent of patients without detectable hepatitis A antibodies at baseline developed antibodies after immunization. Eighty-three percent of patients experienced at least a four-fold rise in KLH antibody concentration. Immune activation and viral load predicted poor recall responses and the number of memory CD4+ T-cells predicted good responses to recall antigens. Naïve CD4+ T-cell numbers, decrease in viral load, increases in CD4+ and CD28+ cells, and decreases in immune activation were associated with responses to presumed neoantigens. CONCLUSIONS: Most HIV-infected patients treated with potent combination antiretrovirals develop responses to recall and presumed neoantigens after immunization. Functional immune restoration in response to immunization is related to control of viral replication, decreased immune activation as well as to both quantitative and qualitative restoration of circulating T- lymphocyte subpopulations.

Characterization of viral dynamics in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy: relationships to host factors, cellular restoration, and virologic end points.

Biphasic plasma viral decays were modeled in 48 patients treated with ritonavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. Estimated first- and second-phase decay rates were d1 as 0.47/day and d2 as 0.04/day. Interpatient differences in both decay rates were significant. The d1 was directly correlated with baseline CD4+, CD4+CD28+, and CD8+CD28+ T lymphocyte counts (P<.05) and inversely correlated with baseline virus load (P=.044) and the magnitude of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte recovery (P<.01). The d2 was directly correlated with baseline percentage of CD8+ T lymphocytes (P=.023), the CD8+CD38+ cell number (P=.024), and the level of IgG that binds to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 gp120 (P=.02). Viral decay rates were not predictive of treatment failure or durability of viral suppression. These exploratory findings are consistent with a model in which immunologic factors contribute to elimination of HIV-infected cells and suggest a dynamic interplay between regulation of HIV expression and lymphocyte activation and recovery.

The effect of commencing combination antiretroviral therapy soon after human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection on viral replication and antiviral immune responses.

Twelve subjects were treated with zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir within 90 days of onset of symptoms of acute infection to determine whether human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection could be eradicated from an infected host. In adherent subjects, with or without modifications due to intolerance, viral replication was suppressed during the 24-month treatment period. Durable suppression reduced levels of HIV-1-specific antibodies and cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses in selected subjects. Proviral DNA in mononuclear cells uniformly persisted. The persistence of HIV-1 RNA expression in lymphoid tissues and peripheral blood mononuclear cells suggests that elimination of this residual pool of virus should be achieved before considering adjustments in antiretroviral therapeutic regimens. In addition, given the reduction in levels of virus-specific immune responses, it would seem prudent to consider enhancing these responses using vaccine strategies prior to the withdrawal of antiviral therapy.

Individual prognoses of long-term responses to antiretroviral treatment based on virological, immunological and pharmacological parameters measured during the first week under therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To predict long-term (12 weeks or longer) virological responses to antiretroviral treatment from measurements made during the first few days on therapy. METHODS: Forty-one HIV-1-infected children were treated with ritonavir for 12 weeks followed by triple drug combination treatment, and the kinetics of virus decay in plasma, ritonavir concentration and CD4 cell counts were measured. A robust multivariate pattern recognition method was used for prediction of the longterm virological responses. RESULTS: The virus decay rate constants calculated from measurements of plasma viral RNA concentrations on the first, second, third, fourth and seventh day on therapy, the drug concentrations in the plasma on day seven, and the pretreatment levels of viral RNA and CD4 cell counts, correlated with long-term levels of plasma HIV-1 RNA. The combination of these parameters contained sufficient information for correct and robust prediction of the long-term response in 88% of the treated children. The predictions of individual responses were stable as demonstrated by a cross-validation analysis, which was highly statistically significant (r=0.87) and specific. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that multiple parameters determine the response to antiretroviral therapy and offer a very early measure of individual long-term responses, suggesting that treatment could be optimized after few days of therapy.

The duration of viral suppression during protease inhibitor therapy for HIV-1 infection is predicted by plasma HIV-1 RNA at the nadir.

OBJECTIVE: To determine markers that are associated with the durability of virologic response to therapy with HIV protease inhibitors in HIV-infected individuals. DESIGN: This study encompassed two retrospective analyses of the duration of virologic response to protease inhibitor therapy. The first analysis included 29 patients receiving either monotherapy or combination therapy with the protease inhibitor ritonavir whose plasma HIV RNA levels rebounded from the point of greatest decline with mutations associated with resistance to ritonavir. The second analysis included a cohort of 102 patients who initially responded to randomized treatment with either monotherapy with ritonavir or combination therapy with ritonavir and zidovudine. METHODS: Durability of response was defined as the time from the initiation of therapy to the point at which plasma HIV RNA displayed a sustained increase of at least 0.6 log10 copies/ml from the nadir value. In the first analysis, durability of response was analyzed with respect to baseline HIV RNA, HIV RNA at the nadir, and the drop in HIV RNA from baseline to the nadir. In the second analysis, time to rebound was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis, stratifying by either baseline HIV RNA or HIV RNA at the nadir. RESULTS: In both analyses, the durability of response was not highly associated with either baseline RNA or the magnitude of RNA decline from baseline. Instead, a strong relationship was observed between the durability of response and the nadir plasma HIV-1 RNA value (P < 0.01). The nadir in viral load was generally reached after 12 weeks of randomized therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Viral RNA determinations at intermediate timepoints may be prognostic of impending virologic failure of protease inhibitor therapy. Therapeutic strategies that allow intensification of initial antiretroviral regimens in the subset of patients with incomplete virological response before the emergence of high level resistance should be investigated.

A phase I/II study of the protease inhibitor ritonavir in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

BACKGROUND: Ritonavir, a potent antiretroviral protease inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of adults and children with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. In a phase I/II study, we assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of the oral solution of ritonavir in HIV-infected children and studied the preliminary antiviral and clinical effects. METHODS: HIV-infected children between 6 months and 18 years of age were eligible. Four dose levels of ritonavir oral solution (250, 300, 350, and 400 mg/m given every 12 hours) were evaluated in two age groups (2 years). Ritonavir was administered alone for the first 12 weeks and then in combination with zidovudine and/or didanosine. Clinical and laboratory parameters were monitored every 2 to 4 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 48 children (median age, 7.7 years; range, 0.5 to 14.4 years) were included in this analysis. Dose-related nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal pain were the most common toxicities and resulted in discontinuation of ritonavir in 7 children. Ritonavir was well absorbed at all dose levels, and plasma concentrations reached a peak 2 to 4 hours after a dose. CD4 cells counts increased by a median of 79 cells/mm3 after 4 weeks of monotherapy and were maintained throughout the study. Plasma HIV RNA decreased by 1 to 2 log10 copies/mL within 4 to 8 weeks of ritonavir monotherapy, and this level was sustained in patients enrolled at the highest dose level of 400 mg/m for the 24-week period. CONCLUSIONS: The oral solution of ritonavir has potent antiretroviral activity as a single agent and is relatively well tolerated by children when administered alone or in combination with zidovudine or didanosine.

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of ritonavir in advanced HIV-1 disease. The Advanced HIV Disease Ritonavir Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Ritonavir is a potent, orally bioavailable inhibitor of HIV-1 protease. We undertook an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ritonavir in patients with HIV-1 infection and CD4-lymphocyte counts of 100 cells/microL or less, who had previously been treated with antiretroviral drugs. METHODS: 1090 patients were randomly assigned twice-daily liquid oral ritonavir 600 mg (n = 543) or placebo (n = 547) while continuing treatment with up to two licensed nucleoside agents. The primary study outcome was any first new, or specified recurrent, AIDS-defining event or death. Open-label ritonavir was provided after 16 weeks in the study to any patient who had an AIDS defining event. FINDINGS: The baseline median CD4-lymphocyte count was 18 (IQR 10-43)/microL in the ritonavir group and 22 (10-47)/microL in the placebo group. Study medication was discontinued in 114 (21.1%) ritonavir-group patients and 45 (8.3%) placebo-group patients mainly because of initial adverse symptoms. Outcomes of AIDS-defining illness or death occurred in 119 (21.9%) ritonavir-group patients and 205 (37.5%) placebo-group patients (hazard ratio 0.53 [95% CI 0.42-0.66]; log-rank p < 0.0001) during median follow-up of 28.9 weeks, with loss to follow-up of 15 (1.4%) patients. Ritonavir was then offered to all patients; at median follow-up of 51 weeks, 87 (16%) ritonavir-group patients had died of any cause versus 126 (23%) placebo-group patients (hazard ratio 0.69 [95% CI 0.52-0.91], log-rank p = 0.0072). INTERPRETATION: Although earlier intervention with combination therapy may provide much more effective treatment, ritonavir in patients with advanced disease and extensive previous antiretroviral use is safe and effective, lowers the risk of AIDS complications, and prolongs survival.

PPD skin reactivity and anergy in HIV-infected patients in Hawaii.

This study was a prospective screening study for PPD and anergy skin test reactivity in 304 HIV-positive individuals. A PPD positivity rate of 4.1% and an anergy rate of 50.5% were observed. The Hawaii HIV population has a relatively low prevalence of latent TB compared with the high prevalence of TB in the Hawaii population at large.

Phase II dose-ranging trial of foscarnet salvage therapy for cytomegalovirus retinitis in AIDS patients intolerant of or resistant to ganciclovir (ACTG protocol 093). AIDS Clinical Trials Group of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To document response to foscarnet salvage therapy in patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis who are intolerant of or resistant to ganciclovir. METHODS: Patients with AIDS and CMV retinitis who had documented hematologic intolerance or resistance to ganciclovir therapy received an induction course of foscarnet, 60 mg/kg every 8 h for 14 days, and subsequent chronic maintenance foscarnet therapy at a daily dose of 60, 90 or 120 mg/kg/day. The first 87 patients were randomly assigned to receive maintenance foscarnet at a dose of 60 or 90 mg/kg/day; all subsequent patients were assigned a maintenance dose of 120 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: A total of 156 evaluable patients were enrolled. Median time to retinitis progression and survival did not differ significantly among groups assigned to different maintenance foscarnet doses. Among patients with retinitis progression documented ophthalmologically occurring at < or = 2 week intervals, despite optimal doses of ganciclovir, time to progression on foscarnet therapy was a median 8 weeks at all doses studied. By dose assignment, there were no significant differences in serious drug-associated toxicity, although trends toward increased renal and hypocalcemic adverse events were observed at higher maintenance doses. CONCLUSION: In patients intolerant of ganciclovir, salvage foscarnet therapy resulted in a longer time to retinitis progression than reported previously in historic controls who terminated ganciclovir therapy. In patients who exhibited clinical resistance to ganciclovir, foscarnet appeared to have efficacy in controlling retinitis. No significant differences in either efficacy or toxicity were observed in the range of foscarnet maintenance doses studied.