Reliability and validity of the FSHD-composite outcome measure in childhood facioscapulohumeral dystrophy.

This study aims to investigate intra-rater reliability and construct validity of the Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy Composite Outcome Measure (FSHD-COM), in childhood FSHD. Participants included eighteen children with FSHD, and matched healthy controls. Reliability data were collected from 15 participants with FSHD over two testing sessions. Validity data were collected from all participants. Participants with FSHD completed; the FSHD-COM (and modified pediatric version), Motor Function Measure-32 (MFM-32), FSHD Severity Scales, Performance of the Upper Limb 2.0, Pediatric Quality of Life™ Neuromuscular Module and pediatric FSHD Health-Index Questionnaire. Both versions of the FSHD-COM showed excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC1,2 > 0.99, lower 95%CI > 0.98) with a Minimal Detectable Change (MDC95%) of ≤14.5%. The FSHD-COM had robust and widespread correlations with other related outcome measures. The FSHD-COM versions and 6 min walk test effectively discriminated between children with and without FSHD; the MFM-32 and 10 m walk/run test did not. Ceiling effects were not observed on either version of the FSHD-COM. Reliability and validity findings in this childhood FSHD study concord with estimates in adults. Both versions of the FSHD-COM were effective in discriminating disease in children with mild FSHD symptoms. The FSHD-COM has the potential to be a useful measure of function across the life span.

Prospective measurement of quality of life in myotonic dystrophy type 1.

INTRODUCTION: Generic patient reported outcome measures have had varied success in tracking QoL in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). AIM: To analyze changes of Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life questionnaire (INQoL) scores in clinic patients with DM1 over a 6-year period. METHOD: Patients completed the INQoL at baseline and after a 6-year period through their attendance in a neurology outpatient clinic. Severity of muscular involvement in DM1 was analyzed using the Muscular Impairment Rating Scale (MIRS). RESULTS: Ninety-nine DM1 patients completed a baseline visit. Sixty-seven of these patients were retested at an interval time. The overall INQoL score improved in our sample of patients (P<.05) as did the following subscales: myotonia (P<.05), pain (P<.05), activities (P<.01), social relationships (P<.01), and body image (P<.05). No changes were observed for the independence and emotions scales. There were no differences in mean change of INQoL scores between patients with worsened MIRS and those with no change in MIRS scale after follow-up (P>.05). CONCLUSION: Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life questionnaire scores improved in our cohort of DM1 patients during a 6-year period. INQoL score did not correlate with progression of muscle weakness. This must be better understood before the selection of the instrument for use in trials to measure therapeutic benefit in DM1 patients.