Management of Acute Subaxial Trauma and Spinal Cord Injury in Professional Collision Athletes.

Sports-related acute cervical trauma and spinal cord injury (SCI) represent a rare but devastating potential complication of collision sport injuries. Currently, there is debate on appropriate management protocols and return-to-play guidelines in professional collision athletes following cervical trauma. While cervical muscle strains and sprains are among the most common injuries sustained by collision athletes, the life-changing effects of severe neurological sequelae (ie, quadriplegia and paraplegia) from fractures and SCIs require increased attention and care. Appropriate on-field management and subsequent transfer/workup at an experienced trauma/SCI center is necessary for optimal patient care, prevention of injury exacerbation, and improvement in outcomes. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, immediate/long-term management, and current return-to-play recommendations of athletes who suffer cervical trauma and SCI.

The Management of Acute Lumbar Stress Reactions of the Pedicle and Pars in Professional Athletes Playing Collision Sports.

Acute stress reactions in the lumbar spine most commonly occur in athletes at the pars interarticularis followed by the pedicle. These reactions occur as a result of repetitive microtrauma from supraphysiological loads applied to the lumbar spine. Characteristic motions such as trunk extension and twisting are also thought to play a role and may be sport-specific. Other risk factors include increased lumbar lordosis, hamstring and thoracolumbar fascia tightness, and abdominal weakness. On physical examination, pain is typically reproduced with lumbar hyperextension. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging or nuclear imaging remain the most sensitive imaging modalities for identifying acute lesions. In the elite athlete, management of these conditions can be challenging, particularly in those playing collision sports such as American football, hockey, or rugby. Nonoperative treatment is the treatment of choice with rehabilitation programs focused on pain-free positioning and progressive strengthening. Operative treatment is rare, but may be warranted for patients symptomatic for >12 months. Specialized diagnosis protocols as well as treatment and return to play guidelines from 4 physicians treating elite athletes playing collision sports are presented and reviewed.

Dimensions of the Subaxial Lateral Mass: A Systematic Review of Anatomic (Morphometric) Measurement Studies.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To review and synthesize information on subaxial lateral mass dimensions in order to determine the ideal starting point, trajectory, and size of a lateral mass screw. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of lateral mass instrumentation for posterior cervical decompression and fusion has become routine as these constructs have increased rigidity and fusion rates. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline and EMBASE was conducted. Studies that provided subaxial cervical lateral mass measurements, distance to the facet, vertebral artery and neuroforamen and facet angle made either directly (eg, cadaver specimen) or from patient imaging were considered for inclusion. Pooled estimates of mean dimensions were reported with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Stratified analysis based on level, sex, imaging plane, source (cadaver or imaging), and measurement method was done. RESULTS: Of the 194 citations identified, 12 cadaver and 10 imaging studies were included. Pooled estimates for C3-C6 were generally consistent for lateral mass height (12.1 mm), width (12.0 mm), depth (10.8 mm), distance to the transverse foramen (11.8 mm), and distance to the nerve. C7 dimensions were most variable. Small sex-based differences in dimensions were noted for height (1.2 mm), width (1.3 mm), depth (0.43 mm), transverse foramen distance (0.9 mm), and nerve distance (0.3-0.8 mm). No firm conclusions regarding differences between measurements made on cadavers and those based on patient computed tomographic images are possible; findings were not consistent across dimensions. The overall strength of evidence is considered very low for all findings. CONCLUSIONS: Although estimates of height, width, and depth were generally consistent for C3-C6, C7 dimensions were variable. Small sex differences in dimensions may suggest that surgeons should use a slightly smaller screw in female patients. Firm conclusions regarding facet angulation, source of measurement, and method of measurement were not possible.