Quality in stroke care during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide study.

Introduction: Evidence-based early stroke care as reflected by fulfillment of process performance measures, is strongly related to better patient outcomes after stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Detailed data on the resilience of stroke care services during the COVID-19 pandemic are limited. We aimed to examine the quality of early stroke care at Danish hospitals during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: We extracted data from Danish national health registries in five time periods (11 March, 2020-27 January, 2021) and compared these to a baseline pre-pandemic period (13 March, 2019-10 March, 2020). Quality of early stroke care was assessed as fulfilment of individual process performance measures and as a composite measure (opportunity-based score). Results: A total of 23,054 patients were admitted with stroke and 8153 with a TIA diagnosis in the entire period. On a national level, the opportunity-based score (95% confidence interval [CI]) at baseline for ischemic patients was 81.1% (80.8-81.4), for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) 85.5% (84.3-86.6), and for TIA 96.0% (95.3-96.1). An increase of 1.1% (0.1-2.2) and 1.5% (0.3-2.7) in the opportunity-based score was observed during the first national lockdown period for AIS and TIA followed by a decline of -1.3% (-2.2 to -0.4) in the gradual reopening phase for AIS indicators. We found a significant negative association between regional incidence rates and quality-of-care in ischemic stroke patients implying that quality decreases when admission rates increase. Conclusion: The quality of acute stroke/TIA care in Denmark remained high during the early phases of the pandemic and only minor fluctuations occurred.

Processes of Care and Associated Factors in Patients With Stroke by Immigration Status.

BACKGROUND: Receiving evidence-based stroke care processes is associated with good clinical outcome. However, data on early stroke care among immigrants are scarce. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether guideline-recommended acute stroke care and associated factors differ between immigrants and Danish-born residents. DESIGN: Patients admitted with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke diagnoses (n=129,724) between 2005 and 2018 were identified from the Danish Stroke Registry. RESULTS: We included 123,928 Danish-born residents and 5796 immigrants with stroke. Compared with Danish-born residents, immigrants were less likely to be admitted to a stroke unit within 24 hours after stroke onset (81.5% vs. 83.9%, P <0.001) and had lower odds of early stroke care including dysphagia screening, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and nutritional assessment. After adjustment for age, sex, clinical, and sociodemographic factors, immigrants had lower odds of early stroke unit admission (odds ratio [OR]: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), early dysphagia screening (OR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98), early physiotherapy (OR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and early occupational therapy (OR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) than Danish-born residents. Small absolute differences in overall quality of stroke care were found when comparing immigrants and Danish-born residents. Significant factors associated with greater likelihood of stroke care included high income, high education, and cohabitation. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrants had lower chances of early stroke unit admission and received fewer individual early stroke care processes such as dysphagia screening, physiotherapy and occupational therapy than Danish-born residents. However, the absolute disparities were in general minor and largely influenced by socioeconomic status and cohabitation.

COVID-19 did not result in increased hospitalization for stroke and transient ischemic attack: A nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of thrombosis increases in infectious diseases, yet observational studies from single centers have shown a decrease in admission of acute ischemic stroke patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. To investigate unselected stroke admission rates we performed a nationwide study in Denmark. METHODS: We extracted information from Danish national health registries. The following mutually exclusive time periods were compared to the year before the lockdown: (1) first national lockdown, (2) gradual reopening, (3) few restrictions, (4) regional lockdown, and (5) second national lockdown. RESULTS: Generally, admission rates were unchanged during the pandemic. In the unadjusted data, we observed a small decrease in the admission rate for all strokes under the first lockdown (incidence rate ratio: 0.93, confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.99) and a slight increase during the periods with gradual reopening, few restrictions, and the regional lockdown driven by ischemic strokes. We found no change in the rate of severe strokes, mild strokes, or 30-day mortality. An exception was the higher mortality for all strokes during the first lockdown (risk ratio: crude 1.30 [CI: 1.03-1.59]; adjusted 1.17 [CI: 0.93-1.47]). The quality of care remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Stroke admission rates remained largely unchanged during the pandemic, while an increased short-term mortality rate in patients admitted with stroke observed during the first lockdown was seen, probably reflecting that the more frail patients constituted a higher proportion of admitted patients at the beginning of the pandemic.