RESUMO
UNLABELLED: Background. In the authors' experience re-epithelialization after successful debridement and granulation can be the most difficult part of the wound closure process. Extracellular matrix products represent a possible solution. However, in studies discussing the effectiveness of extracellular wound matrix (porcine-derived small intestine submucosa [SIS], [OASIS® Wound Matrix, Healthpoint Ltd, Fort Worth, Tex]), a long list of exclusion criteria has been presented. The present study was designed to explore the contraindications of OASIS Wound Matrix. METHODS: In this study, 32 patients in whom the wounds were fully debrided and granulated were treated with weekly applications of the wound matrix. The exclusion criteria formulated in the reported literature were followed. Seven different outcomes were defined. Various patient and wound characteristics that might influence outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Beneficial outcomes were seen in 80.6 % (n = 25) of the patients. The two main complications seen were infection and hypergranulation tissue. Infection was seen in 7 patients (22.6%). Four patients (57.1%) had an unsuccessful outcome. Hypergranulation tissue occurred in another 7 patients (22.6%) after a couple of applications. They all had a beneficial outcome. CONCLUSION: Much of the exclusion criteria used in previous reports are too strict. Infection should be the only absolute contraindication for starting treatment with OASIS, and it is a good reason to discontinue treatment with an ECM. Hypergranulation tissue (22.6%) is an easily treatable complication that has no negative influence on outcome. Some wounds (77.4%) had no complications, or had easily treatable complications that did not negatively influence the outcome.
