Good agreement between physician and self-reported hormone therapy data in a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: In a population-based case-control study examining the effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on breast cancer risk, the authors conducted a validation study comparing prescription data from gynecologists with self-reports. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was conducted in the Rhein-Neckar and Hamburg regions of Germany from 2002 to 2005. A total of 224 cases and 225 controls, stratified by region, age, and hormone use were randomly selected for the validation study. RESULTS: For ever/never use 88.2% agreement was seen, and agreement for ever/never use by type of HT was 80.6%, 80.3%, and 90.5% for mono-estrogen, cyclical combined, and continuous combined therapy, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for duration of use was high, 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77, 0.85), as were the ICCs for age at first and last use, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.91) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97, 0.98). Despite the exceptionally high number of different HT prescriptions available in Germany, comparison of exact brand name resulted in perfect agreement for 50.2% of participants, partial agreement for 29.3%, and no agreement for 20.7%. In general, agreement was not differential by disease status. CONCLUSION: Overall, the self-reported HT of the study participants corresponded well with physicians' reports.

[Results of a comparison: active versus passive reporting in cases of community acquired pneumonia. Results of the German Competence Network CAPNETZ]. / Ergebnisvergleich: Aktives versus passives Meldesystem bei Fällen mit ambulant erworbener Pneumonie. Ergebnisse aus dem Kompetenznetzwerk CAPNETZ.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2002, the German competence network CAPNETZ has been collecting data from inpatients and outpatients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) at eight local clinical centres. Contrary to the literature reports, the proportion of outpatients in CAPNETZ averages out at 28 %. Therefore, this study determines whether an active reporting system can increase the number of cases reported in medical practices. METHOD: In ten medical practices in Lübeck, the passive reporting system was changed to an active reporting system consisting of a) a weekly announcement of CAP cases including negative reporting, b) a study nurse who was responsible for the reporting, c) additional payment, d) a telephone call after two weeks by absent announcements and e) incentives like benchmarking or additional information. The number of the reported cases between the active reporting period (2004) and the same period in the year before was recorded. RESULTS: The number of reported cases increased in eight of the ten medical practices. Overall 72 CAP cases were reported, 33 % more than in the period of passive reporting. The number of patients encompassed in CAPNETZ increased from 17 to 34. CONCLUSION: We did not find a comparable increase of CAP cases either in Lübeck overall (including inpatients) or in all the local clinical centres together. Thus, it is assumed that the increase of reported cases depends on the methodical effect.