Safety and Immunogenicity of Cell-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Young children are at increased risk for influenza-related complications. Safety and immunogenicity of a cell-based quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIVc) was compared with a US-licensed vaccine (QIV) in children aged 6 through 47 months. METHODS: A phase 3, randomized, observer-blind, comparator-controlled, multicenter study was conducted during Northern Hemisphere 2019-2020 influenza season. Children were randomized 2:1 to QIVc or QIV and received 1 or 2 doses of the vaccine, depending upon influenza vaccination history. Safety was assessed for 180 days after last vaccination and sera were collected before and 28 days after last vaccination to measure antibody titers in hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization assays. Noninferiority criteria were met if the upper bounds of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean titer ratio (QIV:QIVc) did not exceed 1.5 and for seroconversion rate difference (QIV-QIVc) did not exceed 10% for the 4 virus strains. RESULTS: Immunogenicity was evaluated in 1092 QIVc and 575 QIV subjects. Success criteria were met for all vaccine strains. Geometric mean titer ratios (upper bound 95% CI) were A/H1N1, 0.73 (0.84); A/H3N2, 1.04 (1.16); B/Yamagata, 0.73 (0.81); and B/Victoria, 0.88 (0.97). Seroconversion differences (upper bound 95% CI) were -11.46% (-6.42), 3.13% (7.81), -14.87% (-9.98), and -5.96% (-1.44) for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata, and B/Victoria, respectively. Rates of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups with no serious adverse events related to vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: QIVc was well-tolerated and immune responses were similar to a US-licensed QIV in children 6 through 47 months of age.

Efficacy of a Cell-Culture-Derived Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Children.

BACKGROUND: Cell-culture-derived influenza vaccines may enable a closer antigenic match to circulating strains of influenza virus by avoiding egg-adapted mutations. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of a cell-culture-derived quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4c) using a Madin-Darby canine kidney cell line in children and adolescents 2 to less than 18 years of age. During three influenza seasons, participants from eight countries were enrolled in an observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial comparing IIV4c with a noninfluenza vaccine (meningococcal ACWY). All the participants received a dose of a trial vaccine. Children 2 to less than 9 years of age without previous influenza vaccination who were assigned to the IIV4c group received a second dose on day 29; their counterparts who were assigned to the comparator group received placebo. Participants were followed for at least 180 days for efficacy and safety. The presence of influenza virus in nasopharyngeal swabs from participants with influenza-like illness was confirmed by reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay and viral culture. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate the efficacy of IIV4c as measured by the first occurrence of laboratory-confirmed type A or B influenza (primary end point). RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2019, a total of 4514 participants were randomly assigned to receive IIV4c or the meningococcal ACWY vaccine. Laboratory-confirmed influenza occurred in 175 of 2257 participants (7.8%) in the IIV4c group and in 364 of 2252 participants (16.2%) in the comparator group, and the efficacy of IIV4c was 54.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.7 to 62.1). Efficacy was 80.7% (95% CI, 69.2 to 87.9) against influenza A/H1N1, 42.1% (95% CI, 20.3 to 57.9) against influenza A/H3N2, and 47.6% (95% CI, 31.4 to 60.0) against influenza B. IIV4c showed consistent vaccine efficacy in subgroups according to age, sex, race, and previous influenza vaccination. The incidences of adverse events were similar in the IIV4c group and the comparator group. CONCLUSIONS: IIV4c provided protection against influenza in healthy children and adolescents across seasons, regardless of previous influenza vaccination. (Funded by Seqirus; EudraCT number, 2016-002883-15; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03165617.).

Comparability of Titers of Antibodies against Seasonal Influenza Virus Strains as Determined by Hemagglutination Inhibition and Microneutralization Assays.

We compared titers of antibodies against A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B influenza virus strains collected pre- and postvaccination using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) assays and data from two vaccine trials: study 1, performed with a cell-grown trivalent influenza vaccine (TIVc) using cell-grown target virus in both assays, and study 2, performed with an egg-grown adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIVe) using egg-grown target virus. The relationships between HI- and MN-derived log-transformed titers were examined using different statistical techniques. Deming regression analyses showed point estimates for slopes generally close to 1 across studies and strains. The slope of regression was closest to 1 for A/H3N2 strain when either cell- or egg-grown viral target virus was used. Bland-Altman plots indicated a very small percentage of results outside 2 and 3 standard deviations. The magnitudes and directions of differences between titers in the two assays varied by study and strain. Mean differences favored the MN assay for A/H1N1 and B strains in study 1, whereas the titers determined by HI were higher than those determined by MN against the A/H3N2 strain. In study 2, mean differences favored the MN assay for A/H3N2 and B strains. Overall, the directions and magnitudes of the mean differences were similar between the two vaccines. The concordance correlation coefficient values ranged from 0.74 (A/H1N1 strain, study 1) to 0.97 (A/H3N2 strain, study 1). The comparative analysis demonstrates an overall strong positive correlation between the HI and MN assays. These data support the use of the MN assay to quantify the immune response of influenza vaccines in clinical studies, particularly for the A/H3N2 strain.

In vitro and in vivo characterisation of ASP9521: a novel, selective, orally bioavailable inhibitor of 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 5 (17ßHSD5; AKR1C3).

BACKGROUND: Aldo-keto reductase 1C3 [AKR1C3;17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 5 (17ßHSD5)], plays a crucial role in persistent production of androgens despite castration, by catalysing conversion of the adrenal androgens dehydroepiandrosterone and androstenedione (AD) into androstenediol and testosterone (T). Hence, AKR1C3 is a promising therapeutic target in castration-resistant prostate cancer, as combination of an AKR1C3 inhibitor and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue may lead to complete androgen blockade. This study describes the preclinical characterisation of the novel AKR1C3 inhibitor ASP9521. METHODS: The inhibitory effect of ASP9521 on AKR1C3-mediated conversion from AD into T was evaluated both in vitro and in vivo, using CWR22R xenografted mice. The effect of ASP9521 on PSA production and cell proliferation was tested using LNCaP cells stably expressing human AKR1C3 (LNCaP-AKR1C3). Pharmacokinetics of ASP9521 were studied in rats, dogs and cynomolgus monkeys. RESULTS: ASP9521 inhibited conversion of AD into T by recombinant human or cynomolgus monkey AKR1C3 in a concentration-dependent manner (IC50,human: 11 nmol/L; IC50,monkey: 49 nmol/L). ASP9521 showed >100-fold selectivity for AKR1C3 over the isoform AKR1C2. In LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells, ASP9521 suppressed AD-dependent PSA production and cell proliferation. In CWR22R xenografts, single oral administration of ASP9521 (3 mg/kg) inhibited AD-induced intratumoural T production and this inhibitory effect was maintained for 24 h. After oral administration, ASP9521 was rapidly eliminated from plasma, while its intratumoural concentration remained high. The bioavailability of ASP9521 after oral administration (1 mg/kg) was 35 %, 78 % and 58 % in rats, dogs and monkeys, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ASP9521 is a potent, selective, orally bioavailable AKR1C3 inhibitor.

Safety, tolerability and anti-tumour activity of the androgen biosynthesis inhibitor ASP9521 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: multi-centre phase I/II study.

BACKGROUND: ASP9521 is a first-in-class orally available inhibitor of the enzyme 17 ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 5 (17 ßHSD5; AKR1C3), catalysing the conversion of dehydroepiandrosterone and androstenedione into 5-androstenediol and testosterone. It has demonstrated anti-tumour activity in in vitro and in vivo preclinical models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This first-in-man phase I/II study utilised a 3 + 3 dose escalation design starting at 30 mg ASP9521/day, with the aim of defining a maximum tolerated dose, as defined by the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Eligible patients received ASP9521 orally for 12 weeks. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics and anti-tumour activity were assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (median age: 68 years; range 52-76) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after chemotherapy were included; 12 patients discontinued treatment at or before week 13, mainly due to disease progression. The most common adverse events were grade 1/2 and included asthenia (N = 5), constipation (N = 4), diarrhoea (N = 3), back pain (N = 3) and cancer pain (N = 3). PK demonstrated a half-life (t1/2) ranging from 16 to 35 h, rapid absorption and dose proportionality. No biochemical or radiological responses were identified; neither endocrine biomarker levels nor circulating tumour cell counts were altered by ASP9521. Given the lack of observable clinical activity, the study was terminated without implementing a planned 12-week dose expansion part at selected doses or a planned food-effect study part. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mCRPC, ASP9521 demonstrated dose-proportional increase in exposure over the doses evaluated, with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. However, the novel androgen biosynthesis inhibitor showed no relevant evidence of clinical activity.

The pharmacokinetics of darexaban (YM150), an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, are not affected by ketoconazole, a strong inhibitor of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein.

We investigated the effects of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the direct clotting factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) and its main active metabolite darexaban glucuronide (YM-222714) which almost entirely determines the antithrombotic effect. In this open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study, 26 healthy male volunteers received in one treatment period a single dose of darexaban 60 mg, and in the other treatment period, ketoconazole 400 mg once daily on Days 1-9 with a single dose of darexaban 60 mg on Day 4. Washout between periods was at least 1 week. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of darexaban glucuronide (darexaban plus ketoconazole versus darexaban) for AUCinf was 1.11 (1.00, 1.23), and for Cmax 1.18 (1.03, 1.35). Darexaban concentrations remained very low (AUClast ∼196-fold lower) in relation to darexaban glucuronide concentrations. In conclusion, the PK of darexaban glucuronide was not affected to a clinically relevant degree by co-administration of the strong CYP3A/P-glycoprotein inhibitor, ketoconazole. The PK of the parent compound darexaban were changed, however, concentrations remained quantitatively insignificant in relation to the main active moiety, darexaban glucuronide.

Darexaban (YM150), an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

To investigate the impact of the direct Factor Xa inhibitor darexaban administered in a modified-release formulation (darexaban-MR) on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of digoxin. In this Phase I, randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study (8 days for each treatment, 10 days washout), 24 healthy subjects received darexaban-MR 120 mg once/day (qd) + digoxin 0.25 mg qd in one treatment period, and placebo + digoxin 0.25 mg qd in the other treatment period. Blood for PK assessment of digoxin and darexaban was obtained in serial profile on day 8, as well as pre-dose on day 6-7; urinary PK samples were obtained up to 24 h after the last dose on day 8. A lack of interaction was determined if 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMR) of digoxin C max,ss and AUC0-24h,ss with and without darexaban-MR co-administration were within 0.80-1.25 limits. Pharmacodynamic activity was assessed by international normalized ratio and activated partial thromboplastin time. Twenty-three subjects completed the study. The GMR (90 % CI) for C max,ss and AUC0-24h,ss of digoxin plus darexaban versus digoxin plus placebo was 1.03 (90 % CI: 0.94-1.12) and 1.11 (90 % CI: 1.05-1.17), respectively. The 90 % CI for the GMRs fell within the limits of 0.80-1.25, indicating a lack of drug-drug interaction. Co-administration of digoxin with darexaban-MR was well tolerated, with no unexpected treatment-emergent adverse events or safety concerns. Co-administration of darexaban-MR did not impact the steady-state PK profile of digoxin.

Clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of darexaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, in healthy Caucasian and Japanese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Darexaban (YM150) is a potent direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor developed for the prophylaxis of venous and arterial thromboembolic disease. This drug is rapidly and extensively metabolized to darexaban glucuronide (YM-222714), which is a pharmacologically active metabolite. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the clinical pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and tolerability of ascending multiple oral doses of darexaban in healthy non-elderly Caucasian and Japanese subjects. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple dose-escalating study of healthy Caucasian and Japanese male and female subjects was performed. The tested doses were 20, 60, 120 and 240 mg of darexaban. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of darexaban glucuronide increased with dose, and Cmax and AUC increased dose-dependently after both single and repeated doses in both Caucasians and Japanese. Cmax was about 17%-19% lower in Caucasians than in Japanese, although AUC appeared to be similar. The time-profiles of prothrombin time reported as the international normalized ratio (PT-INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and FXa activity closely followed the time-concentration profile of darexaban glucuronide, and no clear differences were observed in ethnicity. Overall, 38 of the 82 enrolled subjects reported a total of 57 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Fifty-five TEAEs were of mild intensity and two were of moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that single and multiple doses of darexaban are safe and well tolerated up to 240 mg with predictable PK and PD profiles in both Caucasians and Japanese, and that ethnicity does not affect its PK, PD or tolerability.

Absorption, metabolism and excretion of darexaban (YM150), a new direct factor Xa inhibitor in humans.

1. The absorption, metabolism and excretion of darexaban (YM150), a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, were investigated after a single oral administration of [(14)C]darexaban maleate at a dose of 60 mg in healthy male human subjects. 2. [(14)C]Darexaban was rapidly absorbed, with both blood and plasma concentrations peaking at approximately 0.75 h post-dose. Plasma concentrations of darexaban glucuronide (M1), the pharmacological activity of which is equipotent to darexaban in vitro, also peaked at approximately 0.75 h. 3. Similar amounts of dosed radioactivity were excreted via faeces (51.9%) and urine (46.4%) by 168 h post-dose, suggesting that at least approximately half of the administered dose is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. 4. M1 was the major drug-related component in plasma and urine, accounting for up to 95.8% of radioactivity in plasma. The N-oxides of M1, a mixture of two diastereomers designated as M2 and M3, were also present in plasma and urine, accounting for up to 13.2% of radioactivity in plasma. In faeces, darexaban was the major drug-related component, and N-demethyl darexaban (M5) was detected as a minor metabolite. 5. These findings suggested that, following oral administration of darexaban in humans, M1 is quickly formed during first-pass metabolism via UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, exerting its pharmacological activity in blood before being excreted into urine and faeces.

The pharmacokinetics of darexaban are not affected to a clinically relevant degree by rifampicin, a strong inducer of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4.

AIMS: We investigated the effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the direct clotting factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) and its main active metabolite, darexaban glucuronide (YM-222714), which almost entirely determines the antithrombotic effect. METHODS: In this open-label, single-sequence study, 26 healthy men received one dose of darexaban 60 mg on day 1 and oral rifampicin 600 mg once daily on days 4-14. On day 11, a second dose of darexaban 60 mg was given with rifampicin. Blood and urine were collected after study drug administration on days 1-14. The maximal plasma drug concentration (C(max)) and exposure [area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time of quantifiable measurable concentration; (AUC(last)) or AUC(last) extrapolated to infinity (AUC(∞))] were assessed by analysis of variance of PK. Limits for statistical significance of 90% confidence intervals for AUC and C(max) ratios were predefined as 80-125%. RESULTS: Darexaban glucuronide plasma exposure was not affected by rifampicin; the geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of AUC(last) with/without rifampicin was 1.08 (1.00, 1.16). The C(max) of darexaban glucuronide increased by 54% after rifampicin [ratio 1.54 (1.37, 1.73)]. The plasma concentrations of darexaban were very low (<1% of darexaban glucuronide concentrations) with and without rifampicin. Darexaban alone or in combination with rifampicin was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, rifampicin did not affect the PK profiles of darexaban glucuronide and darexaban to a clinically relevant degree, suggesting that the potential for drug-drug interactions between darexaban and CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein-inducing agents is low.

Serum biomarkers in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: value for assessing drug effects?

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common chronic liver disease throughout the world. In the USA, approximately 3-5% of the population are affected, and the prevalence of this condition is increasing. NASH is associated with an increased risk of liver-related morbidity, such as cirrhosis and fibrosis, as well as cardiovascular disease, and in spite of several clinical studies investigating putative new drugs, no approved treatment is currently available. This is partly due to the nature of the disease. NASH is a complex, slowly progressing disease, and confirmatory clinical trials have long treatment durations and require invasive end points (a liver biopsy). Such invasive assessments are only accepted in confirmatory trials; clinical studies in the exploratory clinical development phase must rely on noninvasive biomarkers as the primary end point. Experimental and clinical research continues to achieve validation and qualification of biomarkers in NASH, which will hopefully assist the development of new treatments for NASH patients.

A randomized, dose-response study of sugammadex given for the reversal of deep rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade under sevoflurane anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex is the first of a new class of selective muscle relaxant binding drugs developed for the rapid and complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium and vecuronium. Many studies have demonstrated a dose-response relationship with sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in patients induced and maintained under propofol anesthesia. However, sevoflurane anesthesia, unlike propofol, can prolong the effect of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) such as rocuronium and vecuronium. METHODS: We designed this randomized, open-label, dose-response trial to explore the dose-response relationship of sugammadex for the reversal of deep neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium or vecuronium under propofol-induced and sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia. As a secondary objective, the safety variables of sugammadex were evaluated. After anesthesia induction with propofol, 102 patients aged > or = 20 and < 65 yr were randomized to receive a single bolus dose of rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg (n = 50) or vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg (n = 52), followed by maintenance doses (rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg or vecuronium 0.02-0.03 mg/kg) as needed. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using acceleromyography. After the last dose of NMBD, at 1-2 posttetanic counts, a single bolus dose of sugammadex 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, or 8.0 mg/kg was administered. The primary efficacy variable was time from start of sugammadex administration to recovery of the T(4)/T(1) ratio to 0.9. RESULTS: The per-protocol population consisted of 48 patients in the rocuronium group and 47 in the vecuronium group. A dose-response effect was demonstrated for decreased mean time to recovery of the T(4)/T(1) ratio to 0.9 with increasing sugammadex dose in both NMBD groups (per-protocol population): rocuronium group, 79.8 (SD 33.0) min (sugammadex 0.5 mg/kg) to 1.7 (0.7) min (4.0 mg/kg) and 1.1 (0.3) min (8.0 mg/kg subgroup); vecuronium group, 68.4 (31.9) min (0.5 mg/kg) to 3.3 (3.5) min (4.0 mg/kg), and 1.7 (0.8) min (8.0 mg/kg subgroup). Neuromuscular monitoring showed recurrent neuromuscular blockade in 5 patients, all in the rocuronium group (2 given sugammadex 0.5 mg/kg and 3 given 1.0 mg/kg), but there were no clinical events attributable to recurrent or residual neuromuscular blockade. CONCLUSION: Sugammadex at doses of > or = 4 mg/kg provides rapid reversal of deep rocuronium- and vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade under sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia.

Reversal of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex after continuous infusion of rocuronium in patients randomized to sevoflurane or propofol maintenance anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex rapidly reverses neuromuscular blockade induced by bolus rocuronium doses, but it has not been investigated after continuous rocuronium infusion in surgical patients. We therefore examined the clinical effect of sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade induced by continuous rocuronium infusion in adults undergoing surgery under maintenance anesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol. METHODS: This four-center, comparative, parallel-group study, randomly assigned 52 adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-III) to maintenance anesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol. Neuromuscular blockade was induced by bolus injection of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium followed by continuous infusion of 7 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) rocuronium adjusted to maintain a neuromuscular blockade depth of zero response to train-of-four and a posttetanic count of no more than 10 responses. A single dose of 4 mg/kg sugammadex was administered at first twitch (T1) 3-10%. The primary clinical effect variable was recovery time to a train-of-four ratio of 0.9. RESULTS: Median recovery time from start of sugammadex administration to a train-of-four ratio of 0.9 in the sevoflurane and propofol groups was 1.3 and 1.2 min, respectively. The estimated difference in recovery time between groups was 9 s (95% confidence interval -6 to 20 s), entirely within the predefined equivalence interval. Median plasma rocuronium concentration just before sugammadex administration was 33% lower during maintenance anesthesia with sevoflurane than with propofol. Sugammadex was well tolerated. One adverse event (procedural hypotension) was considered to be probably related to sugammadex. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose sugammadex (4 mg/kg) after continuous rocuronium infusion is equally effective and well tolerated during maintenance anesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol.

Reversal of rocuronium-induced (1.2 mg/kg) profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex: a multicenter, dose-finding and safety study.

BACKGROUND: Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade can be accomplished by chemical encapsulation of rocuronium by sugammadex, a modified gamma-cyclodextrin derivative. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of sugammadex in reversing rocuronium-induced profound neuromuscular blockade at 5 min in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients. METHODS: Forty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients (aged 18-64 yr) scheduled to undergo surgical procedures (anticipated anesthesia duration >/= 90 min) were randomly assigned to a phase II, multicenter, assessor-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel, dose-finding study. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol and an opioid. Profound neuromuscular blockade was induced with 1.2 mg/kg rocuronium bromide. Sugammadex (2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12.0, or 16.0 mg/kg) or placebo (0.9% saline) was then administered 5 min after the administration of rocuronium. Neuromuscular function was monitored by acceleromyography, using train-of-four nerve stimulation. Recovery time was the time from the start of administration of sugammadex or placebo, to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9. Safety assessments were performed on the day of the operation and during the postoperative and follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients received either sugammadex or placebo. Increasing doses of sugammadex reduced the mean recovery time from 122 min (spontaneous recovery) to less than 2 min in a dose-dependent manner. Signs of recurrence of blockade were not observed. No serious adverse events related to sugammadex were reported. Two adverse events possibly related to sugammadex were reported in two patients (diarrhea and light anesthesia); however, both patients recovered without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Sugammadex rapidly and effectively reversed profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in humans and was well tolerated.

Effective reversal of moderate rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex, a selective relaxant binding agent.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex rapidly reverses rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. This study explored the dose-response relation of sugammadex given as a reversal agent at reappearance of the second muscle twitch after rocuronium- and vecuronium-induced block. A secondary objective was to investigate the safety of single doses of sugammadex. METHODS: In this two-center, phase II, dose-finding study, 80 patients (age >or= 18 yr, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, surgery >or= 60 min requiring muscle relaxation for intubation) were randomly assigned to receive rocuronium (0.60 mg/kg) or vecuronium (0.10 mg/kg). Sugammadex or placebo was administered at reappearance of the second muscle twitch. The primary efficacy endpoint was time from starting sugammadex administration until recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, sugammadex produced dose-dependent decreases in mean time to recovery for all train-of-four ratios in the rocuronium and vecuronium groups. The mean time for recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9 in the rocuronium group was 31.8 min after placebo compared with 3.7 and 1.1 min after 0.5 and 4.0 mg/kg sugammadex, respectively. The mean time for recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9 in the vecuronium group was 48.8 min after placebo, compared with 2.5 and 1.4 min after 1.0 and 8.0 mg/kg sugammadex, respectively. Sugammadex was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Sugammadex rapidly reversed rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at reappearance of the second muscle twitch and was well tolerated. A dose-response relation was observed with sugammadex for reversal of both rocuronium- and vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block.