Unleashing an Underlying Serious Cardiac Arrhythmia: A Case of Coronary Vasospasm With Atypical Presentation.

This case report highlights the atypical presentation of coronary artery vasospasm in a 59-year-old patient presenting with syncope due to ventricular arrhythmia. Despite initially elevated troponin levels and non-significant lesions observed during left heart catheterization, the patient experienced recurrent chest pain and dizziness, prompting further evaluation. Ultimately, coronary vasospasm was identified as the likely differential diagnosis, supported by various diagnostic modalities including electrocardiogram, Zio patch monitoring, transthoracic echocardiogram, cardiac MRI, and CT angiography. Management involved the initiation of calcium channel blocker therapy, leading to a non-eventful follow-up in the cardiology clinic.

The Glasgow Experience of Extended Myocardial Protection: A Novel Method of Implantation to Reduce Primary Graft Dysfunction After Heart Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Around 2000 heart transplants are performed in Europe annually. The rates of primary graft dysfunction in Europe are among the highest in the world. With increasing demand for organs and the limited supply of donors, novel techniques such as ex vivo normothermic perfusion have garnered incre-asing interest. We present a series of patients who underwent heart transplant at our unit in which we used a novel implantation technique to reduce primary graft dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared our experience with the novel method detailed in our article (Glasgow experience group) with a contemporary UK cohort (2015-2016) of patients (control group). We performed multivariable logistic regression to compare the Glasgow experience with the control group with primary graft dysfunction as the outcome measure. We adjusted for donor age, recipient diabetes mellitus, urgent listing status, bypass time, and total ischemic time. RESULTS: Among 194 patients in both cohorts, 140 patients (72.1%) were men and 36 (18.6%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. The odds ratio of primary graft dysfunction in the control group was 2.99 (95% CI, 1.02- 8.75) compared with the Glasgow experience group. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel approach was associated with significant reductions in primary graft dysfunction, with a trend toward improved 1-year survival. Larger studies are needed to show differences after further adjustment for known confounders of primary graft dysfunction. We believe this novel technique is safe, cost-effective, and reproducible.

The GermAn Laser Lead Extraction RegistrY: GALLERY.

AIMS: The GermAn Laser Lead Extraction RegistrY: GALLERY is a retrospective, national multicentre registry, investigating the safety and efficacy of laser lead extraction procedures in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four German centres that are performing laser lead extraction have participated in the registry. All patients, treated with a laser lead extraction procedure between January 2013 and March 2017, were consecutively enrolled. Safety and efficacy of laser lead extraction were investigated. A total number of 2524 consecutive patients with 6117 leads were included into the registry. 5499 leads with a median lead dwell time of 96 (62-141) months were treated. The mean number of treated leads per patient was 2.18 ± 1.02. The clinical procedural success rate was 97.86% and the complete lead removal was observed in 94.85%. Additional extraction tools were used in 6.65% of cases. The rate of procedural failure was 2.14% with lead age ≥10 years being its only predictor. The overall complication rate was 4.32%, including 2.06% major and 2.26% minor complications. Procedure-related mortality was 0.55%. Female sex and the presence of abandoned leads were predictors for procedure-related complications. The all-cause in-hospital mortality was 3.56% with systemic infection being the strongest predictor, followed by age ≥75 years and chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSION: In the GALLERY, a high success- and low procedure-related complication rates have been demonstrated. In multivariate analysis, female sex and the presence of abandoned leads were predictors for procedure-related complications, while the presence of systemic infection, age ≥75 years, and chronic kidney disease were independent predictors for all-cause mortality.

Treatment of a massive pseudoaneurysm originating from the ascending aorta with an off-the-shelf stent graft.

A 73-year-old patient who underwent an emergency coronary bypass surgery in our institution and who required postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in December 2019 presented in August 2020 with a rapidly growing subxiphoidal, pulsating swelling. A computed tomography scan revealed a massive mediastinal pseudoaneurysm originating from an 8-mm Dacron graft that was sutured to the ascending aorta during the index surgery for arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation. Due to the location and extent of the pseudoaneurysm, an open surgical revision was deemed high risk. Because no bypass conduit originated from the ascending aorta, we decided to occlude the entry of the pseudoaneurysm with a stent graft. Also, urgency did not allow for the manufacturing of a custom-made device, so an off-the-shelf stent graft had to be implanted. Currently, the only off-the-shelf thoracic stent graft with a length suitable for the ascending aorta (<7 cm) is the Medtronic Valiant Navion prosthesis, of which 2 prostheses (37 mm × 52 mm; covered seal) were successfully implanted to exclude the pseudoaneurysm. A follow-up computed tomography scan performed 4 months postoperatively showed no perfusion and regression of the pseudoaneurysm. With the growing number of reports describing stent graft placement in the ascending aorta, more off-the-shelf stent grafts suitable for the ascending aorta are desirable.

Tunneling Magnetoresistance DC Current Transformer for Ion Beam Diagnostics.

In this paper, open loop and closed loop Tunneling Magnetoresistance (TMR) DC Current Transformers (DCCTs) for ion beam diagnostics are presented. The DCCTs employ MR sensors to measure the DC component of the accelerator's ion beam. A comparative study between Giant Magnetoresistance (GMR) and TMR sensors is presented to illustrate the sensor selection criterion for the DCCT application. The two proposed DCCTs are studied in open and closed loop configurations. A closed loop feedback electronic system is designed to generate a feedback current equivalent to the ion beam current such that the sensor operates at zero flux. Furthermore, theoretical and experimental results for the TMR-based DCCT including noise analysis are presented for both open loop and closed loop configurations. Both configurations' minimum detectable currents are in the range of microampere. The proposed closed loop hardware prototype has a settling time of less than 15 µs. The measured minimum detectable currents for the open and closed loop TMR-based DCCTs are 128.2 µA/Hz and 10.14 µA/Hz at 1 Hz, respectively.

Management of a Residual VSD 60 Years after One of the First Operations Worldwide.

Background Although surgical closure of ventricular septal defect (VSD) is the gold standard treatment, patients are subjected to deterioration in the following decades. We will present here the first case in literature surviving 60 years after surgical VSD closure with a residual VSD and presenting again for surgery. Case Description A 68-year-old male patient who underwent surgical closure of a perimembranous VSD in Berlin in 1959. Postoperatively, a small residual VSD was noticed, which was well tolerated over six decades. He presented 60 years postoperatively with severe aortic regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, and moderate mitral regurgitation.

Mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock post-acute myocardial infarction-a decade of lessons.

BACKGROUND: There are 0.9 catheterization labs per 100,000 inhabitants in Scotland for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which are much less accessible to patients in remote and rural areas. An uncommon but sinister sequalae following AMI is cardiogenic shock (CS) that could be refractory to inotropic support. CS complicates 5-15% of AMIs occurring in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs). Outcomes of CS are poor with mortalities of up to 90% reported in the literature in the absence of experienced care. We report our experience as the tertiary referral centre in Scotland for MCS and heart transplantation over 8 years. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was undertaken on all patients registered to the MCS service. The database was interrogated for patient demographics, type of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and duration of MCS support, PCI-outcomes and survival to 30 days. A time-to-event analysis was performed using patient survival as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (16 male, 7 females) were included. The median age of the patients as 50 years (range, 45-56 years). VA-ECMO was the initial MCS of choice in 17 (73.9%) patients with BIVAD for 4 (17.4%) patients and LVAD for 2 (8.7%) patients. Thirty-day mortality was 21.8% in this cohort, however survival to discharge was 52.2%. Eleven (47.8%) patients recovered without the need for any further support, however only 9 (81.8%) patients in this subgroup survived to discharge. Three (13.0%) patients received a durable LVAD. In this subgroup, one patient was transplanted whereas two patients died due to complications while on support. The median length of in-hospital MCS support was 4 days. Median in-hospital stay was 27 days. Long-term follow up of up to 8 years demonstrates a high mortality beyond 30-day up to the first 6-month post MCS support. CONCLUSIONS: MCS usage in these patients carries a high mortality in the early post-implantation period. However, there is a significant benefit to patients who survive the initial bridging period to recovery or destination therapy.

Prediction and Perception of Technical Difficulties in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Unexpected intra-operative technical difficulties are not uncommon in cardiac surgery. Our objective is to study the incidence, predictors, and consequences of unexpected difficulties in adult cardiac operations. METHODS: A total of 500 consecutive elective operations were included in the study. Before every operation, the surgeon and the assistant were asked to study the case and give a score (one to ten) for the expected technical difficulty of the operation. After every operation, the surgeon and the assistant were asked to give a score for the observed technical difficulty. The scores and perioperative data were collected and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: In relation to different interventions and consultant/trainee predictions, unexpected technical difficulties were encountered in 7% to 16% of cases. There was a significant difference between surgeons and trainees in the perception of level of increased difficulty, represented by the mean of differences between expected and observed score (0.084 ± 0.54 versus 0.016 ± 0.5, P = .0002). In multivariable analysis, only female gender (P < .0001) was identified as a factor associated with unexpected technical difficulties. There was no correlation between the incidence of complications and unexpected surgical difficulty. However, there was a weak positive correlation between operative times and observed difficulty score. CONCLUSION: Unexpected technical difficulties are not uncommon in adult cardiac operations. Trainees tend to underestimate the difficulties perceived by the surgeon. This study can be a first step towards developing a technical difficulty score, which could be a helpful tool for medical quality management, as well as in training programs.

Implementation of the aortic no-touch technique to reduce stroke after off-pump coronary surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Despite substantial scientific effort, the relationship between stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting and the use of the aortic no-touch off-pump technique (anOPCAB) remains incompletely understood. The present study aimed to define the effect of anOPCAB on the occurrence and time point of stroke. METHODS: A total cohort of 15,042 consecutive patients underwent surgical myocardial revascularization at a single institution. After establishing anOPCAB as routine procedure, 4695 patients received surgery by 18 different surgeons using the anaortic approach. After the exclusion of all patients with cardiogenic shock and "side-clamp" off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 13,279 patients (4485 with anOPCAB) were included in the study. Perioperative strokes were classified as strokes occurring during the hospital stay, with early strokes observed immediately after emergence from anesthesia (vs delayed strokes). RESULTS: The anOPCAB technique reduced the postoperative stroke rate to 0.49% versus 1.31% in on-pump patients (P < .0001). The overall stroke rate after adoption of anOPCAB (0.64%) decreased compared with before its adoption (1.40%; P < .0001). With anOPCAB, the risk of early strokes virtually disappeared to 4 of 4485 patients (0.09%; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.18% vs 0.83% in on-pump patients; P < .0001), whereas the incidence of delayed strokes was not affected (0.40% vs 0.48%; P = .5181). The key results were confirmed after adjustment using propensity score-based analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The anOPCAB technique with avoidance of any aortic manipulation is an effective tool to minimize the risk of early strokes during coronary artery bypass grafting, and thus, should be considered as a routine approach. In contrast, additional preventive strategies against delayed strokes remain to be elaborated.

Current indications for stentless aortic bioprostheses.

The best aortic prostheses have been debated for decades. The introduction of stentless aortic bioprostheses was aimed at improving hemodynamics and potentially the durability of aortic bioprostheses. Despite the good short- and long-term outcomes after implantation of stentless aortic bioprostheses, their use remains limited owing to the technically demanding implantation techniques. Nevertheless, stentless aortic bioprostheses might be of special benefit in certain indications, where they could be a valuable addition to the surgical armamentarium.

The Use of Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting in Different Degrees of Obesity.

Background Obesity is a limiting factor for the use of bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMAs). Therefore, we assessed the safety of their use in different degrees of obesity. Patients and Methods We studied two groups of patients with obesity using propensity matching. The first group received single internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts (SIMA group, 526 patients) and the second group received bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA group, 526 patients). Patients were classified further according to their body mass index (BMI) into overweight (BMI = 25-29.9 kg/m2), obese (BMI = 30-34.9 kg/m2), and severely obese (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2). Results Preoperative data were similar regarding age (62.78 ± 9.96 vs. 62.98 ± 9.66 years; p = 0.734), female sex (17.5 vs. 18.6%; p = 0.631), diabetes mellitus (26.3 vs. 27.2%; p = 0.74), EuroSCORE (3.21 ± 2.23 vs. 3.18 ± 2.41; p = 0.968), and COPD (16 vs. 16%; p = 1). No significant differences were noticed between the two groups regarding the number of peripheral anastomoses (3.09 ± 0.84 vs. 3.12 ± 0.83; p = 0.633), myocardial infarction (1.7 vs. 1.7%; p = 1), reexploration (1.3 vs. 2.1%; p = 0.34), deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) (2.1 vs. 2.9%; p = 0.43), and 30-day mortality (0.8 vs. 1.1%; p = 0.53). Multivariate analysis identified BMI and intensive care unit stay as independent predictors for DSWI. However, postoperative blood loss (694.56 ± 631.84 vs. 811.67 ± 688.73 mL; p < 0.001) and the incidence of pneumothorax (1 vs. 2.7%; p = 0.037) were higher in BIMA group. Conclusion Patients with obesity can benefit from BIMA grafting. However, postoperative blood loss and the incidence of pneumothorax can be higher using this technique.

The Use of Bilateral Internal Mammary Arteries for Coronary Revascularization in Patients with COPD: Is It a Good Idea?

BACKGROUND: The use of bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) is limited worldwide, especially in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thus, we assessed the safety of the use of BIMA in COPD patients. METHODS: From cohorts of 8846 patients operated on at our center for primary isolated multi-vessel coronary bypass operations between 2002 and 2012, we studied two propensity-matched groups of patients with COPD who received either single internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts (SIMA group: 137 patients) or exclusively BIMA (BIMA group: 137 patients). Preoperative data were similar regarding age (63.59 ± 10.62 versus 65.55 ± 9.61 years; P = .10), body mass index (BMI) (28.6 ± 4.71 versus 28.42 ± 3.86 kg/m2; P = .72), diabetes mellitus (32% versus 27%; P = .08), EuroSCORE (4.34 ± 2.23 versus 4.8 ± 2.52; P = .09) and ejection fraction (58.7 ± 13.08% versus 60.29 ± 14.13%; P = .32). RESULTS: No significant differences were noticed between the two groups regarding the number of peripheral anastomoses (3.07 ± 0.77 versus 3.06 ± 0.85; P = .90), total operation time (192.17 ± 43.06 versus 200.63 ± 39.24 min; P = .08), postoperative stroke (0.7% versus 0%; P = .29), myocardial infarction (2.92% versus 3.6%; P = .81), reintubation (2.9% versus 4.4%; P = .66), reexploration (0.7% versus 2.2%; P = .32), deep sternal wound infection (2.9% versus 3.6%; P = .81) and 30-day mortality (2.2% versus 2.9%; P = .77). However, postoperative blood loss (726.1 ± 468.35  versus 907 ± 890.58 mL; P = .03) was higher in the BIMA group. CONCLUSION: COPD patients can benefit from coronary artery revascularization with BIMA; however, postoperative blood loss can be higher using this technique.

Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis: a potential option for haemodialysis patients†.

OBJECTIVES: End-stage renal disease patients on regular haemodialysis are at higher risk of calcification. Therefore, many surgeons have concerns regarding the implantation of bioprostheses in such patients. The haemodynamic advantages of stentless aortic bioprostheses support their use; however, these have not been studied yet in end-stage renal disease patients. We studied accordingly the early and mid-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement (AVR) using Medtronic Freestyle stentless aortic bioprostheses in this subset of patients in comparison with stented aortic bioprostheses. METHODS: We retrospectively studied two groups of consecutive patients on regular haemodialysis who required AVR between 2007 and 2013. Non-Freestyle (NFS) group received stented aortic bioprostheses (36 patients) and Freestyle (FS) group received Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprostheses (48 patients). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 76 months with a mean follow-up of 36.3 ± 25 months. RESULTS: Patients in both groups showed similar demographic characters regarding age (76.4 ± 8.1 vs 74.9 ± 7.2 years; P = 0.35), male gender (58 vs 60%; P = 0.57) and diabetes mellitus (42 vs 48%; P = 0.57). Smaller aortic bioprostheses were implanted in the NFS (23.3 ± 1.2 vs 25.4 ± 2.1; P < 0.001) with consequently higher postoperative mean gradients (14.1 ± 4.1 vs 11.9 ± 5.3 mmHg; P = 0.004). No significant differences were noted regarding postoperative neurological disorder (8 vs 12%; P = 0.73), deep sternal wound infection (3 vs 4%; P = 0.68), re-exploration (8 vs 8%; P = 0.91) and in-hospital mortality (6 vs 4%; P = 0.92). Mid-term follow-up showed higher prosthetic valve calcification and/or sclerosis in NFS group (25 vs 6%; P = 0.015), whereas no significant differences were noticed between the two groups regarding stroke (0 vs 8%; P = 0.13), endocarditis (0 vs 4%; P = 0.50), 36- and 72-month survival (51 ± 2%, 14 ± 4% vs 55 ± 2%, 19 ± 3%, respectively; P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic bioprostheses are a good option for haemodialysis patients requiring AVR, offering acceptable mid-term survival. The Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprostheses could allow the implantation of larger bioprostheses inferring consequently lower mean gradients, with a potentially higher resistance to calcification and sclerosis in haemodialysis patients.

Short term outcomes of total arterial coronary revascularization in patients above 65 years: a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the advantages of bilateral mammary coronary revascularization, many surgeons are still restricting this technique to the young patients. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the safety and potential advantages of bilateral mammary coronary revascularization in patients older than 65 years. METHODS: Group I included 415 patients older than 65 years with exclusively bilateral mammary revascularization. Using a propensity score we selected 389 patients (group II) in whom coronary bypass operations were performed using the left internal mammary artery and the great saphenous vein. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative stroke was higher in group II (1.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.0111). The amount of postoperative blood loss was higher in group I (908 +/- 757 ml vs. 800 +/- 713 ml, P = 0.0405). There were no other postoperative differences between both groups. CONCLUSION: Bilateral internal mammary artery revascularization can be safely performed in patients older than 65 years. T-graft configuration without aortic anastomosis is particularly beneficial in this age group since it avoids aortic manipulation, which is an important risk factor for postoperative stroke.

Concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass: the effect of valve type on the blood flow in bypass grafts.

OBJECTIVE: In cases of aortic valve replacement, the downstream flow profile and turbulence in the ascending aorta differ according to the prosthetic aortic valve implanted. The objective of this work is to study the influence of prosthetic valve type on the flow in the bypass grafts implanted to the ascending aorta in cases of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass. METHODS: The study is conducted on 456 patients receiving concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass vein grafts anastomosed to the ascending aorta. The patients included in the study received a total number of 725 vein grafts, 249 biological aortic valves and 207 mechanical aortic valves. Intraoperative transit time flow measurement was done for all bypass grafts and a multiple regression model was calculated for the factors influencing the flow in the bypass grafts. RESULTS: The mean flow in vein grafts in patients receiving biological valves was 49.79+/-26.88 ml/min, while in patients receiving mechanical valves it was 46.54+/-26.68 ml/min. The multiple regression model revealed that receiving a mechanical valve is an independent risk factor for lower flow in the vein grafts. CONCLUSIONS: The type of the aortic valve implanted and consequently the downstream flow profile in the ascending aorta do affect the flow in the vein grafts in cases of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass. Receiving a mechanical aortic valve is an independent risk factor for lower flow in the vein grafts.