Desmopressin testing in von Willebrand disease: Lowering the burden.

Background: Individuals with von Willebrand disease (VWD) require desmopressin testing because of interindividual response differences. However, testing is burdensome, while not all patients may need extensive testing. Objectives: To provide von Willebrand factor (VWF) cutoffs that predict desmopressin nonresponse and thereby identify individuals who do not need extensive testing in a retrospective cohort. We validated these cutoffs in a prospective cohort. Patients and Methods: We included 376 patients (Type 1 VWD with VWF activity [VWF:Act] <0.30 IU/ml: n = 112; with VWF:Act 0.30-0.50 IU/ml: n = 206; Type 2 VWD: n = 58; ages, 5-76 years) from January 2000 to July 2020. We collected VWF:Act and factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) at baseline and several time points after desmopressin (T1-T6). We defined response as VWF:Act and FVIII:C 0.50 IU/ml or greater at T1 and T4. We compared VWF:Act and FVIII:C distribution (historically lowest level, baseline, and T1) between responders and nonresponders and determined cutoffs discriminating between these groups. Results were validated in a group of 30 individuals. Results: All individuals with Type 1 VWD and Type 2 VWD, respectively, with baseline VWF:Act 0.34 IU/ml or greater or 0.28 IU/ml or greater were responders. In individuals with T1 VWF:Act ≥0.89 IU/ml (Type 1 VWD) or T1 VWF:Act 1.10 IU/ml or greater (Type 2 VWD), response remained at T4. Conclusion: Desmopressin testing is not needed when lowest historical VWF:Act is 0.30 IU/ml or greater. In patients with Type 1 VWD who require testing, measurements after T1 are often not needed. In patients with Type 2 VWD who require testing, we advise performing T1 and T4 measurements.

Quantification of the relationship between desmopressin concentration and Von Willebrand factor in Von Willebrand disease type 1: A pharmacodynamic study.

INTRODUCTION: Desmopressin can be used to prevent bleeding in von Willebrand disease (VWD), but the relationship between desmopressin and von Willebrand factor activity (VWF:Act) has yet to be quantified. AIM: To quantify the relationship between desmopressin dose, its plasma concentration and the VWF:Act response in type 1 VWD patients. METHODS: Forty-seven VWD patients (median age 25 years, IQR: 19-37; median body weight 71 kg, IQR: 59-86) received an IV desmopressin dose of .3 mcg/kg. In total, 177 blood samples were available for analysis. We developed an integrated population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model using nonlinear mixed effect modelling. Subsequently, we performed Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the efficacy of the current dosing regimen. RESULTS: A one-compartment PK model best described the time profile of the desmopressin concentrations. In the PD turnover model, the relationship between desmopressin plasma concentration and release of VWF:Act from the vascular endothelium was best described with an Emax model. Typically, VWF:Act increased 452% with an EC50 of .174 ng/ml. Simulations demonstrated that after .3 mcg/kg desmopressin intravenously, >90% patients with a VWF:Act baseline of ≥.20 IU/mL attain a VWF:Act >.5 IU/ml up to ≥4 h after administration. A capped dose of 30 mcg was sufficient in patients weighing over 100 kg. CONCLUSION: The relationship between desmopressin and VWF:Act was quantified in a PK-PD model. The simulations provide evidence that recently published international guidelines advising an intravenous desmopressin dose of .3 mcg/kg with a capped dose of 30 mcg > 100 kg gives a sufficient desmopressin response.

Is pharmacokinetic-guided dosing of desmopressin and von Willebrand factor-containing concentrates in individuals with von Willebrand disease or low von Willebrand factor reliable and feasible? A protocol for a multicentre, non-randomised, open label cohort trial, the OPTI-CLOT: to WiN study.

INTRODUCTION: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a bleeding disorder, caused by a deficiency or defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF). In case of medical procedures or bleeding, patients are treated with desmopressin and/or VWF-containing concentrates to increase plasma VWF and factor VIII (FVIII). However, in many cases these factor levels are outside the targeted range. Therefore, population pharmacokinetic (PK) models have been developed, which aim to quantify and explain intraindividual and interindividual differences in treatment response. These models enable calculation of individual PK parameters by Bayesian analysis, based on an individual desmopressin test or PK profile with a VWF-containing concentrate. Subsequently, the dose necessary for an individual to achieve coagulation factor target levels can be calculated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Primary aim of this study is to assess the predictive performance (the difference between predicted and measured von VWF activity and FVIII levels) of Bayesian forecasting using the developed population PK models in four different situations: (A) desmopressin testing (n≥30); (B) medical procedures (n=70; 30 receiving desmopressin, 30 receiving VWF-containing concentrate and 10 receiving a combination of both); (C) bleeding episodes (n=20; 10 receiving desmopressin and 10 receiving VWF-containing concentrate) and (D) prophylaxis with a VWF-containing concentrate (n=3 to 5). Individuals with all types of VWD and individuals with low VWF (VWF 0.30-0.60 IU/mL) will be included. Reliability and feasibility of PK-guided dosing will be tested by assessing predictive performance, treatment duration, haemostasis, patient satisfaction and physician satisfaction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The OPTI-CLOT:to WiN study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Results of the study will be communicated through publication in international scientific journals and presentation at (inter)national conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7212 (NTR7411); Pre-results, EudraCT 2018-001631-46.

Population pharmacokinetics of the von Willebrand factor-factor VIII interaction in patients with von Willebrand disease.

Recent studies have reported that patients with von Willebrand disease treated perioperatively with a von Willebrand factor (VWF)/factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate with a ratio of 2.4:1 (Humate P/Haemate P) often present with VWF and/or FVIII levels outside of prespecified target levels necessary to prevent bleeding. Pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing may resolve this problem. As clinical guidelines increasingly recommend aiming for certain target levels of both VWF and FVIII, application of an integrated population PK model describing both VWF activity (VWF:Act) and FVIII levels may improve dosing and quality of care. In total, 695 VWF:Act and 894 FVIII level measurements from 118 patients (174 surgeries) who were treated perioperatively with the VWF/FVIII concentrate were used to develop this population PK model using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. VWF:Act and FVIII levels were analyzed simultaneously using a turnover model. The protective effect of VWF:Act on FVIII clearance was described with an inhibitory maximum effect function. An average perioperative VWF:Act level of 1.23 IU/mL decreased FVIII clearance from 460 mL/h to 264 mL/h, and increased FVIII half-life from 6.6 to 11.4 hours. Clearly, in the presence of VWF, FVIII clearance decreased with a concomitant increase of FVIII half-life, clarifying the higher FVIII levels observed after repetitive dosing with this concentrate. VWF:Act and FVIII levels during perioperative treatment were described adequately by this newly developed integrated population PK model. Clinical application of this model may facilitate more accurate targeting of VWF:Act and FVIII levels during perioperative treatment with this specific VWF/FVIII concentrate (Humate P/Haemate P).

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of von Willebrand Factor Activity in von Willebrand Disease Patients after Desmopressin Administration.

OBJECTIVE: Most von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients can be treated with desmopressin during bleeding or surgery. Large interpatient variability is observed in von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity levels after desmopressin administration. The aim of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic (PK) model to describe, quantify, and explain this variability. METHODS: Patients with either VWD or low VWF, receiving an intravenous desmopressin test dose of 0.3 µg kg-1, were included. A PK model was derived on the basis of the individual time profiles of VWF activity. Since no VWF was administered, the VWF dose was arbitrarily set to unity. Interpatient variability in bioavailability (F), volume of distribution (V), and clearance (Cl) was estimated. RESULTS: The PK model was developed using 951 VWF activity level measurements from 207 patients diagnosed with a VWD type. Median age was 28 years (range: 5-76), median predose VWF activity was 0.37 IU/mL (range: 0.06-1.13), and median VWF activity response at peak level was 0.64 IU/mL (range: 0.04-4.04). The observed PK profiles were best described using a one-compartment model with allometric scaling. While F increased with age, Cl was dependent on VWD type and sex. Inclusion resulted in a drop in interpatient variability in F and Cl of 81.7 to 60.5% and 92.8 to 76.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A PK model was developed, describing VWF activity versus time profile after desmopressin administration in patients with VWD or low VWF. Interpatient variability in response was quantified and partially explained. This model is a starting point toward more accurate prediction of desmopressin dosing effects in VWD.

A Novel Quantitative Method for Analyzing Desmopressin in Human Plasma Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Desmopressin (D-amino D-arginine vasopressin: dDAVP) is used for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A and Von Willebrand disease. Studies on the rationale of dosing are scarce and mainly focus on the underlying causes of the vast differences in desmopressin response among individuals. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of desmopressin in human plasma for identifying its pharmacokinetics and its therapeutic effect relationship in patients with bleeding disorder. METHODS: The method entails solid-phase extraction with ion exchange for sample clean-up, followed by an LC-MS/MS run. The technique has been validated for analytical selectivity as well as specificity, process efficiency, linearity, accuracy, imprecision, and stability. RESULTS: This method showed good selectivity because no significant chromatographic matrix interferences were observed. The determination coefficient (R) of the calibration curves was ≥0.990. Analyte accuracy ranged from 89.2% to 111.8%, and the between- and within-run imprecision was less than 9.3% in a plasma concentration and range from 60 to 3200 pg/mL. Samples were stable during 3 freeze/thaw cycles with an additional 120 hours of storage at room temperature (21°C-24°C) and 96 hours in the autosampler (10°C). The total run time was approximately 5 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The LC-MS/MS method presented enables quantification of desmopressin in human plasma, and it is sensitive, specific, efficient, accurate, and precise. This analytical technique is a valuable and useful tool to study the interpatient variability of pharmacokinetics.

von Willebrand Factor and Factor VIII Clearance in Perioperative Hemophilia A Patients.

BACKGROUND: von Willebrand factor (VWF) is crucial for optimal dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate in hemophilia A patients as it protects FVIII from premature clearance. To date, it is unknown how VWF behaves and what its impact is on FVIII clearance in the perioperative setting. AIM: To investigate VWF kinetics (VWF antigen [VWF:Ag]), VWF glycoprotein Ib binding (VWF:GPIbM), and VWF propeptide (VWFpp) in severe and moderate perioperative hemophilia A patients included in the randomized controlled perioperative OPTI-CLOT trial. METHODS: Linear mixed effects modeling was applied to analyze VWF kinetics. One-way and two-way analyses of variance were used to investigate perioperative VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratios and associations with surgical bleeding. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients with median age of 48.8 years (interquartile range: 34.8-60.0) were included. VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIbM increased significantly postoperatively. Blood type non-O or medium risk surgery were associated with higher VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIbM levels compared with blood type O and low risk surgery. VWFpp/VWF:Ag was significantly higher immediately after surgery than 32 to 57 hours after surgery (p < 0.001). Lowest VWF:Ag quartile (0.43-0.92 IU/mL) was associated with an increase of FVIII concentrate clearance of 26 mL/h (95% confidence interval: 2-50 mL/h) compared with highest VWF antigen quartile (1.70-3.84 IU/mL). VWF levels were not associated with perioperative bleeding F(4,227) = 0.54, p = 0.710. CONCLUSION: VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIbM levels increase postoperatively, most significantly in patients with blood type non-O or medium risk surgery. Lower VWF antigen levels did not lead to clinically relevant higher FVIII clearance. VWF:Ag or VWF:GPIbM levels were not associated with perioperative hemorrhage.

A Novel, Enriched Population Pharmacokinetic Model for Recombinant Factor VIII-Fc Fusion Protein Concentrate in Hemophilia A Patients.

BACKGROUND: The currently published population pharmacokinetic (PK) models used for PK-guided dosing in hemophilia patients are based on clinical trial data and usually not externally validated in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to validate a published model for recombinant factor VIII-Fc fusion protein (rFVIII-Fc) concentrate and to develop an enriched model using independently collected clinical data if required. METHODS: Clinical data from hemophilia A patients treated with rFVIII-Fc concentrate (Elocta) participating in the United Kingdom Extended Half-Life Outcomes Registry were collected. The predictive performance of the published model was assessed using mean percentage error (bias) and mean absolute percentage error (inaccuracy). An extended population PK model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM). RESULTS: A total of 43 hemophilia A patients (FVIII ≤ 2 IU/dL), aged 5 to 70 years, were included. The prior model was able to predict the collected 244 rFVIII-Fc levels without significant bias (-1.0%, 95% CI: -9.4 to 7.3%) and with acceptable accuracy (12.9%). However, clearance and central distribution volume were under predicted in patients <12 years, which was expected as this age group was not represented in the previous model population. An enriched population PK model was constructed, which was able to successfully characterize PK profiles of younger children. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the existing rFVIII-Fc population PK model is valid for patients ≥ 12 years. However, it is not reliable in younger patients. Our alternative model, constructed from real world patient data including children, allows for better description of patients ≥5 years.

One piece of the puzzle: Population pharmacokinetics of FVIII during perioperative Haemate P® /Humate P® treatment in von Willebrand disease patients.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) are treated on demand with von Willebrand factor and factor VIII (FVIII) containing concentrates present with VWF and/or FVIII plasma levels outside set target levels. This carries a risk for bleeding and potentially for thrombosis. Development of a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model based on FVIII levels is a first step to more accurate on-demand perioperative dosing of this concentrate. METHODS: Patients with VWD undergoing surgery in Academic Haemophilia Treatment Centers in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2018 treated with a FVIII/VWF plasma-derived concentrate (Haemate® P/Humate P®) were included in this study. Population PK modeling was based on measured FVIII levels using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM). RESULTS: The population PK model was developed using 684 plasma FVIII measurements of 97 VWD patients undergoing 141 surgeries. Subsequently, the model was externally validated and reestimated with independent clinical data from 20 additional patients undergoing 31 surgeries and 208 plasma measurements of FVIII. The observed PK profiles were best described using a one-compartment model. Typical values for volume of distribution and clearance were 3.28 L/70 kg and 0.037 L/h/70 kg. Increased VWF activity, decreased physical status according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (ASA class >2), and increased duration of surgery were associated with decreased FVIII clearance. CONCLUSION: This population PK model derived from real world data adequately describes FVIII levels following perioperative administration of the FVIII/VWF plasma-derived concentrate (Haemate® P/Humate P® ) and will help to facilitate future dosing in VWD patients.

Current and Emerging Options for the Management of Inherited von Willebrand Disease.

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder with an estimated prevalence of ~1% and clinically relevant bleeding symptoms in approximately 1:10,000 individuals. VWD is caused by a deficiency and/or defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF). The most common symptoms are mucocutaneous bleeding, hematomas, and bleeding after trauma or surgery. For decades, treatment to prevent or treat bleeding has consisted of desmopressin in milder cases and of replacement therapy with plasma-derived concentrates containing VWF and Factor VIII (FVIII) in more severe cases. Both are usually combined with supportive therapy, e.g. antifibrinolytic agents, and maximal hemostatic measures. Several developments such as the first recombinant VWF concentrate, which has been recently licensed for VWD, will make a more "personalized" approach to VWD management possible. As research on new treatment strategies for established therapies, such as population pharmacokinetic-guided dosing of clotting factor concentrates, and novel treatment modalities such as aptamers and gene therapy are ongoing, it is likely that the horizon to tailor therapy to the individual patients' needs will be extended, thus, further improving the already high standard of care in VWD in most high-resource countries.